-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
Issues: unicode-org/message-format-wg
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Author
Label
Projects
Milestones
Assignee
Sort
Issues list
Stability policy should cover option values
Agenda+
Requested for upcoming teleconference
LDML46.1
MF2.0 Draft Candidate
normative
specification
#928
opened Nov 8, 2024 by
aphillips
[FEEDBACK] Implementing Feedback gathered during the technical preview
u:dir
is a little bit tricky
Preview-Feedback
#918
opened Oct 27, 2024 by
eemeli
Default functions should manage their internal bidirectionality
LDML46.1
MF2.0 Draft Candidate
registry
#916
opened Oct 27, 2024 by
eemeli
[FEEDBACK] Simpler formulation of Pattern Selection
formatting
Preview-Feedback
Feedback gathered during the technical preview
#898
opened Oct 3, 2024 by
macchiati
Add optional normative guidance on bidi/whitespace serialization
Action-Item
Action item assigned by the WG
LDML46.1
MF2.0 Draft Candidate
syntax
Issues related with MF Syntax
#889
opened Sep 16, 2024 by
aphillips
CLDR semantic datetime skeleton spec is nearly ready and MF2 should use it
LDML46.1
MF2.0 Draft Candidate
registry
#866
opened Aug 22, 2024 by
sffc
TC39-TG2 would like to see completion of the TG5 study
Preview-Feedback
Feedback gathered during the technical preview
#865
opened Aug 22, 2024 by
sffc
Ask ICU-TC for feedback
Action-Item
Action item assigned by the WG
#864
opened Aug 22, 2024 by
echeran
Update CLDR test data
LDML46.1
MF2.0 Draft Candidate
organizational
Issues related with MF group organization and workflow
resolve-candidate
This issue appears to have been answered or resolved, and may be closed soon.
test-suite
#856
opened Aug 8, 2024 by
aphillips
Conformance with UAX #31 & UTS #55
Action-Item
Action item assigned by the WG
blocker-candidate
The submitter thinks this might be a block for the Technology Preview
normative
syntax
Issues related with MF Syntax
#847
opened Jul 30, 2024 by
eemeli
[FEEDBACK] What is the semantic difference between local declaration using itself, and an input declaration
Preview-Feedback
Feedback gathered during the technical preview
#819
opened Jul 9, 2024 by
lucacasonato
[FEEDBACK] The re-use of Feedback gathered during the technical preview
resolve-candidate
This issue appears to have been answered or resolved, and may be closed soon.
:function
between "annotation" and "output" positions can be a bit confusing
Preview-Feedback
#818
opened Jul 9, 2024 by
lucacasonato
Update WG documentation to reflect change in status of default registry format materials
Action-Item
Action item assigned by the WG
documentation
Improvements or additions to documentation
editorial
#817
opened Jul 9, 2024 by
aphillips
Ask W3C TAG for feedback
Action-Item
Action item assigned by the WG
LDML 47
LDML 47 Release (Stable)
#805
opened Jun 3, 2024 by
aphillips
Consider adding a token grammar
Future
Deferred for future standardization
specification
#729
opened Mar 14, 2024 by
catamorphism
[FEEDBACK] Message Format Unquoted Literals
Future
Deferred for future standardization
Preview-Feedback
Feedback gathered during the technical preview
resolve-candidate
This issue appears to have been answered or resolved, and may be closed soon.
syntax
Issues related with MF Syntax
#724
opened Mar 13, 2024 by
macchiati
[FEEDBACK] add Action item assigned by the WG
LDML46.1
MF2.0 Draft Candidate
Preview-Feedback
Feedback gathered during the technical preview
registry
:number
offset option
Action-Item
#701
opened Mar 3, 2024 by
macchiati
Other issues in the Registry section.
registry
resolve-candidate
This issue appears to have been answered or resolved, and may be closed soon.
Stale
#677
opened Feb 21, 2024 by
macchiati
Review non-integral exact number selection algorithm
blocker-candidate
The submitter thinks this might be a block for the Technology Preview
formatting
Seek-Feedback-in-Preview
Issue should be something we seek feedback on in the tech preview period
#675
opened Feb 21, 2024 by
eemeli
Provide structure in the registry for distinguishing types of options
normative
registry
resolve-candidate
This issue appears to have been answered or resolved, and may be closed soon.
specification
#663
opened Feb 18, 2024 by
macchiati
We should not require LDML 47 Release (Stable)
registry
Seek-Feedback-in-Preview
Issue should be something we seek feedback on in the tech preview period
syntax
Issues related with MF Syntax
*
if the variant keys exhaust all possibilities
formatting
LDML 47
#603
opened Jan 15, 2024 by
eemeli
Should we really be using LDML 47 Release (Stable)
question
Further information is requested
Seek-Feedback-in-Preview
Issue should be something we seek feedback on in the tech preview period
syntax
Issues related with MF Syntax
{{pattern}}
and |literal|
delimiters?
LDML 47
#602
opened Jan 15, 2024 by
eemeli
Previous Next
ProTip!
Type g i on any issue or pull request to go back to the issue listing page.