Aquapointer blog post

[Misty-W]

Adds a blog post re-introducing Aquapointer and outlining the latest updates.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
unitary-fund	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Oct 18, 2024 1:14am
unitary-fund-prel	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview		Oct 18, 2024 1:14am

[nathanshammah]

Thanks @Misty-W. This is great. Potentially, I have some change requests and suggestions, but I want to check with you how much time sensitive this is. We could merge as it is this now and then improve the text even when is live (without yet publicizing it). Or we could do all at once later as in usual PR review.

About the feedback: The text is great and crisp, but it goes down to the very technical part very quickly, especially given the high interdisciplinary type of the work. I'd make more specific suggestions about this first part, including for visuals.

[Misty-W]

Thanks @nathanshammah! Definitely welcome your comments. There's not a big rush but targeting to wrap up the "Phase 1" items of the project this month.

[nathanshammah]

@Misty-W I added more detailed comments and suggestions.

[nathanshammah]

@Misty-W thanks for the edits. When you can, there are some comments to address, on the first part of the blog post: a more gentle introduction and explanation (QUBO, the high level rationale, etc.), as well as an image (or more) such as those used by Mauro.

[nathanshammah]

@Misty-W here is the blog post by QP. Please consider adding reference to the paper just published – with a format from references, see, e.g., the collisions post markdown. It would be great to post it soon as we have also other posts in the pipeline but it's good to keep it FIFO as much as possible.

[Misty-W]

To do: add references 2 and 3, image(s), markdown formatting.

[Misty-W]

@nathanshammah thanks for the suggestions! I think I addressed all of your comments. Let me know if there's any other changes needed.

[nathanshammah]

Looks much better now, great intro! Some comments:

• Please double check with authors of the images for eventual credits.
• Reference image one and whether the second panel is the actual 3DRISM image
• Regarding the second image, it needs more explanation. It does not explain the meaning of crosses, circles, or the equation. You can consider removing part of the image if it is too cumbersome to explain, but right now it is a bit too much left to the reader to figure out.
• "3D Reference Interactive Site Model (3D-RISM)" what about making it a reference as the other ones, instead of a direct link, since it's a paper?

[nathanshammah]

Hi @Misty-W, checking for any updates here.

[Misty-W]

hi @nathanshammah, I reached out to Mauro and Daniele for the image permissions / credit and am awaiting their response. I believe everything else is addressed.

[nathanshammah]

Many thanks, great. Approved modulo the credits, feel free to merge once they're in.