Conversation
- Updated `.env` file for better clarity and organization, including renaming project and stack names. - Added new tests for user email and full name updates, including validation for email format and length constraints. - Improved error handling in the frontend for user updates, providing clearer feedback for duplicate emails and validation errors. - Enhanced user settings tests to cover edge cases for updating user information.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This pull request introduces a comprehensive user profile management feature (001-user-profile-management) that enables users to view and update their basic profile fields (email and full_name). Despite the PR description mentioning command specifications for requirements analysis, the actual changes implement a complete feature including specification documents, implementation enhancements, and test coverage.
Changes:
- Complete feature specification suite in
specs/001-user-profile-management/including spec.md, plan.md, tasks.md, research.md, data-model.md, quickstart.md, contracts/, and checklists - Frontend enhancements to UserInformation component with improved validation (255 char limit for full_name) and error handling
- Backend test coverage for partial updates, validation errors, and edge cases
- Extensive template and tooling infrastructure including PowerShell scripts, command specifications, and project constitution
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 34 out of 34 changed files in this pull request and generated 7 comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| specs/001-user-profile-management/*.md | Complete feature specification suite documenting requirements, implementation plan, tasks, research, data model, and integration scenarios |
| frontend/src/components/UserSettings/UserInformation.tsx | Enhanced error handling for duplicate emails and fixed form reset on cancel |
| frontend/tests/user-settings.spec.ts | Added E2E tests for 255-char validation, partial updates, and duplicate email handling |
| backend/tests/api/routes/test_users.py | Added comprehensive backend tests for validation, partial updates, and edge cases |
| .cursor/commands/*.md | Command specifications for specification workflow (specify, plan, tasks, implement, analyze, checklist, etc.) |
| .specify/templates/*.md | Templates for spec, plan, tasks, and checklist generation |
| .specify/scripts/powershell/*.ps1 | PowerShell automation scripts for feature management and agent context updates |
| .specify/memory/constitution.md | Project constitution defining development principles and guidelines |
| .env | Configuration changes (unrelated to feature - should be removed) |
| .cursor/rules/specify-rules.mdc | Agent context file with technology stack information |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
| @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ | |||
| # full-stack-fastapi-template Development Guidelines | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The .cursor/rules/specify-rules.mdc file also has a BOM (Byte Order Mark) character at the beginning of line 1. This character can cause issues with some parsers and tools. The file should use UTF-8 encoding without BOM.
| # full-stack-fastapi-template Development Guidelines | |
| # full-stack-fastapi-template Development Guidelines |
| test("Partial update - email only", async ({ page }) => { | ||
| const newEmail = randomEmail() | ||
| // Get original full_name before edit | ||
| const originalNameElement = page | ||
| .locator("form") | ||
| .getByText(/N\/A|.*/, { exact: false }) | ||
| .filter({ hasText: /^(?!Email)/ }) | ||
| .first() | ||
| const originalName = (await originalNameElement.textContent()) || "" | ||
|
|
||
| await page.getByRole("button", { name: "Edit" }).click() | ||
| await page.getByLabel("Email").fill(newEmail) | ||
| await page.getByRole("button", { name: "Save" }).click() | ||
|
|
||
| await expect(page.getByText("User updated successfully")).toBeVisible() | ||
| await expect( | ||
| page.locator("form").getByText(newEmail, { exact: true }), | ||
| ).toBeVisible() | ||
| // Full name should remain unchanged (check in view mode) | ||
| if (originalName && originalName !== "N/A") { | ||
| await expect( | ||
| page.locator("form").getByText(originalName.trim(), { exact: false }), | ||
| ).toBeVisible() | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The test "Partial update - email only" has fragile element selection logic. Lines 95-99 use complex regex patterns and filters to find the full_name element, which could easily break with UI changes. The test retrieves the original name value but only verifies it hasn't changed if it's not "N/A" (line 111), making the verification conditional and potentially skipping important assertions. A more robust approach would be to directly query for the full_name value before and after the update.
| def test_update_user_me_partial_update_email_only( | ||
| client: TestClient, normal_user_token_headers: dict[str, str], db: Session | ||
| ) -> None: | ||
| new_email = random_email() | ||
| data = {"email": new_email} | ||
| r = client.patch( | ||
| f"{settings.API_V1_STR}/users/me", | ||
| headers=normal_user_token_headers, | ||
| json=data, | ||
| ) | ||
| assert r.status_code == 200 | ||
| updated_user = r.json() | ||
| assert updated_user["email"] == new_email | ||
| # Verify full_name was not changed (should remain as it was) | ||
| user_query = select(User).where(User.email == new_email) | ||
| user_db = db.exec(user_query).first() | ||
| assert user_db | ||
| assert user_db.email == new_email |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The test test_update_user_me_partial_update_email_only does not verify that the full_name was actually preserved. The comment on line 343 states "Verify full_name was not changed" but the test only verifies the email was updated (line 347). It should also check that user_db.full_name matches the original value before the update.
| $AGENTS_FILE = Join-Path $REPO_ROOT 'AGENTS.md' | ||
| $WINDSURF_FILE = Join-Path $REPO_ROOT '.windsurf/rules/specify-rules.md' | ||
| $KILOCODE_FILE = Join-Path $REPO_ROOT '.kilocode/rules/specify-rules.md' | ||
| $AUGGIE_FILE = Join-Path $REPO_ROOT '.augment/rules/specify-rules.md' | ||
| $ROO_FILE = Join-Path $REPO_ROOT '.roo/rules/specify-rules.md' | ||
| $CODEBUDDY_FILE = Join-Path $REPO_ROOT 'CODEBUDDY.md' | ||
| $QODER_FILE = Join-Path $REPO_ROOT 'QODER.md' | ||
| $AMP_FILE = Join-Path $REPO_ROOT 'AGENTS.md' | ||
| $SHAI_FILE = Join-Path $REPO_ROOT 'SHAI.md' | ||
| $Q_FILE = Join-Path $REPO_ROOT 'AGENTS.md' | ||
| $BOB_FILE = Join-Path $REPO_ROOT 'AGENTS.md' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Multiple agent file variables are assigned to the same path AGENTS.md: $AGENTS_FILE, $AMP_FILE, $Q_FILE, and $BOB_FILE (lines 52, 59, 61, 62). This appears to be intentional for agents that share a common file, but it creates confusion and potential issues when updating these agents separately. If they truly should share the same file, this should be documented with a comment explaining the design decision.
| @@ -0,0 +1,184 @@ | |||
| --- | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The PR title and description describe adding command specifications to .cursor/commands directory (specifically speckit.analyze.md and speckit.checklist.md), but the actual changes in this PR are for a user profile management feature (001-user-profile-management). The PR description does not match the actual code changes being made. This appears to be a copy-paste error where the wrong PR description was used.
| UsersService.updateUserMe({ requestBody: data }), | ||
| onSuccess: () => { | ||
| showSuccessToast("User updated successfully") | ||
| queryClient.invalidateQueries() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There is a redundant call to queryClient.invalidateQueries() in the mutation configuration. The method is called both in onSuccess (line 56) and in onSettled (line 72). Since onSettled runs after both onSuccess and onError, the invalidation in onSuccess is unnecessary and results in duplicate invalidation calls on successful updates.
| queryClient.invalidateQueries() |
| PROJECT_NAME=Full Stack FastAPI Template | ||
| POSTGRES_SERVER=db | ||
| POSTGRES_PORT=5432 | ||
| POSTGRES_USER=postgres | ||
| POSTGRES_PASSWORD=changethis | ||
| POSTGRES_DB=app | ||
| SECRET_KEY=changethis | ||
| FIRST_SUPERUSER=admin@example.com | ||
| FIRST_SUPERUSER_PASSWORD=changethis | ||
|
|
||
| # Emails | ||
| ENVIRONMENT=local | ||
| DOMAIN=localhost | ||
| STACK_NAME=full-stack-fastapi-template | ||
| DOCKER_IMAGE_BACKEND=full-stack-fastapi-template-backend | ||
| DOCKER_IMAGE_FRONTEND=full-stack-fastapi-template-frontend | ||
| TAG=latest | ||
| FRONTEND_HOST=http://localhost:5173 | ||
| BACKEND_CORS_ORIGINS= | ||
| SMTP_HOST= | ||
| SMTP_USER= | ||
| SMTP_PASSWORD= | ||
| EMAILS_FROM_EMAIL=info@example.com | ||
| SMTP_TLS=True | ||
| SMTP_SSL=False | ||
| SMTP_PORT=587 | ||
|
|
||
| # Postgres | ||
| POSTGRES_SERVER=localhost | ||
| POSTGRES_PORT=5432 | ||
| POSTGRES_DB=app | ||
| POSTGRES_USER=postgres | ||
| POSTGRES_PASSWORD=changethis | ||
|
|
||
| EMAILS_FROM_EMAIL= | ||
| SENTRY_DSN= |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The .env file changes appear to be unrelated to the user profile management feature. The changes include modifications to default values, removal of comments and documentation, and reordering of variables. This seems like an accidental inclusion of unrelated configuration changes that should not be part of this PR. Additionally, the BOM (Byte Order Mark) character has been introduced at line 1, which can cause issues with some tools and parsers.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 34 out of 34 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
|
|
||
| # Backend | ||
| BACKEND_CORS_ORIGINS="http://localhost,http://localhost:5173,https://localhost,https://localhost:5173,http://localhost.tiangolo.com" | ||
| PROJECT_NAME=Full Stack FastAPI Template |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The .env file starts with a UTF-8 BOM (Byte Order Mark) character . This can cause issues with some parsers and tools. The BOM should be removed to ensure compatibility.
| PROJECT_NAME=Full Stack FastAPI Template | |
| PROJECT_NAME=Full Stack FastAPI Template |
| @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ | |||
| # full-stack-fastapi-template Development Guidelines | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The .cursor/rules/specify-rules.mdc file also starts with a UTF-8 BOM character . This should be removed for consistency and to avoid potential parsing issues.
| # full-stack-fastapi-template Development Guidelines | |
| # full-stack-fastapi-template Development Guidelines |
| @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@ | |||
| # Feature Specification: User Profile Management | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical discrepancy between PR title/description and actual changes
The PR title is "001 user profile management" and the description claims to add two command specifications (speckit.analyze.md and speckit.checklist.md) to improve requirements quality.
However, the actual changes in this PR include:
- A complete user profile management feature implementation (spec, plan, tasks, research, contracts, tests, code changes)
- Multiple .specify template files (tasks, spec, plan, checklist, agent-file)
- Multiple PowerShell scripts (update-agent-context.ps1, setup-plan.ps1, create-new-feature.ps1, common.ps1, check-prerequisites.ps1)
- Multiple .cursor command files (speckit.taskstoissues, speckit.tasks, speckit.specify, speckit.plan, speckit.implement, speckit.constitution, speckit.clarify, speckit.checklist, speckit.analyze)
- Constitution.md file
- .env file changes
- Cursor rules file
The PR description does not accurately describe what is being changed. Either:
- The PR title and description are incorrect and should describe the full scope of changes
- The PR contains unrelated changes that should be in separate PRs
This makes it very difficult to review the PR and understand its true purpose and scope.
1 participant
This pull request introduces two new command specifications to the
.cursor/commandsdirectory, each designed to improve requirements quality and cross-artifact consistency in feature development. The additions provide structured, repeatable processes for analyzing the quality of requirements and generating high-quality checklists that act as "unit tests" for English-language specifications.New command specifications:
Requirements Quality & Consistency Analysis
.cursor/commands/speckit.analyze.md, a comprehensive command for cross-artifact analysis. It detects inconsistencies, duplications, ambiguities, underspecification, and constitution alignment issues acrossspec.md,plan.md, andtasks.md, producing a structured markdown report with severity ratings and actionable next steps.Checklist Generation for Requirements Quality
.cursor/commands/speckit.checklist.md, a command specification for generating checklists that validate the quality of written requirements (not implementation). The checklist ensures requirements are complete, clear, consistent, measurable, and well-covered, grouping items by quality dimension and referencing relevant sections or gaps.These additions formalize and automate best practices for requirements validation and cross-document consistency, helping teams catch issues early and improve the overall quality of feature specifications.