-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
[v0.26.0] Upgrade GPU and NPU backends #186
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
jiangkuaixue123
wants to merge
11
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
update/v0.26.0
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
cb0a40a
feat(gpu): support vLLM 0.26 DeepSeek remote experts
jiaran-king ff6ebd4
Merge pull request #182 from vllm-project/codex/experts-boundary-v026
jiangkuaixue123 e6e4941
feat(npu): support vLLM 0.26
jiangkuaixue123 30dd270
Merge pull request #183 from jiangkuaixue123/update_npu
jiangkuaixue123 37013a3
refactor(npu): remove PCP support from model runner v1
jiangkuaixue123 f269bc6
Merge pull request #184 from jiangkuaixue123/update_npu
jiangkuaixue123 f585ecc
fix(npu): restore DBO compatibility for vLLM 0.26
jiangkuaixue123 2a61187
Merge pull request #185 from jiangkuaixue123/update_npu
jiangkuaixue123 02345c0
Fix NPU force load balance formatting
jiangkuaixue123 8adb00f
Refresh v0.26 documentation
jiangkuaixue123 f86afa3
fix(npu): upgrade CAM async for vLLM 0.26
jiangkuaixue123 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
[minor] The unified add_request_async now calls self._ensure_output_queue_task() unconditionally (line 358), while the previous AFD async-DP path (deleted lines ~329-341) explicitly omitted it. Confirm whether this behavioral change is intentional or if the AFD path should still skip the output queue task.
Evidence: Read async_dp_engine.py: the old code had two separate branches; the AFD branch (after
# PATCH START) omitted_ensure_output_queue_task(). The new unified code calls it unconditionally at line 358.