Skip to content

word iter#8262

Closed
onursatici wants to merge 1 commit into
os/mask-iterfrom
os/mask-iter-word
Closed

word iter#8262
onursatici wants to merge 1 commit into
os/mask-iterfrom
os/mask-iter-word

Conversation

@onursatici

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Closes: #000

Testing

Signed-off-by: Onur Satici <onur@spiraldb.com>
@codspeed-hq

codspeed-hq Bot commented Jun 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merging this PR will improve performance by 20.52%

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

⚡ 6 improved benchmarks
✅ 1501 untouched benchmarks

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
Simulation chunked_bool_canonical_into[(1000, 10)] 45 µs 30.3 µs +48.68%
Simulation chunked_varbinview_canonical_into[(1000, 10)] 196.7 µs 160.8 µs +22.31%
Simulation chunked_varbinview_into_canonical[(1000, 10)] 211.4 µs 175.6 µs +20.38%
Simulation chunked_varbinview_canonical_into[(100, 100)] 305.3 µs 270.1 µs +13.02%
Simulation bitwise_not_vortex_buffer_mut[128] 275.3 ns 246.1 ns +11.85%
Simulation chunked_varbinview_into_canonical[(100, 100)] 354.8 µs 320.4 µs +10.74%

Tip

Curious why this is faster? Comment @codspeedbot explain why this is faster on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.


Comparing os/mask-iter-word (19f0923) with os/mask-iter (44cd55a)

Open in CodSpeed

@onursatici onursatici mentioned this pull request Jun 5, 2026
@onursatici onursatici closed this Jun 5, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant