Optimize buffer ops#8322
Performance Regression: -12.18%
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
⚡ 19 improved benchmarks
❌ 108 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1401 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 10 skipped benchmarks1
Warning
Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | Simulation | chunked_bool_canonical_into[(1000, 10)] |
20.7 µs | 35.5 µs | -41.8% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compare[48] |
213 µs | 300.5 µs | -29.11% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compare[50] |
227.7 µs | 319 µs | -28.63% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compare[49] |
228.2 µs | 317.1 µs | -28.04% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compare[44] |
207.5 µs | 287.6 µs | -27.87% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compare[47] |
223.5 µs | 309.1 µs | -27.68% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compare[46] |
218.5 µs | 302.1 µs | -27.67% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compare[40] |
190.7 µs | 263.4 µs | -27.61% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compare[44] |
212.1 µs | 292.2 µs | -27.4% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compare[45] |
218.9 µs | 300.8 µs | -27.23% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compare[43] |
209.2 µs | 287.5 µs | -27.21% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compare[42] |
204.5 µs | 281 µs | -27.21% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compare[40] |
195.6 µs | 268.1 µs | -27.04% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compare[43] |
214.2 µs | 292.4 µs | -26.74% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compare[41] |
204.5 µs | 279.1 µs | -26.73% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compare[42] |
209.4 µs | 284.9 µs | -26.5% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compare[41] |
209.3 µs | 283.8 µs | -26.23% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compare[31] |
157.7 µs | 213.6 µs | -26.18% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compare[39] |
199.9 µs | 270.7 µs | -26.16% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compare[38] |
195.5 µs | 264.2 µs | -26.01% |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.
Tip
Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing adamg/buffer-slice-fast (11bb86c) with develop (f67b594)
Footnotes
-
10 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩