Skip to content

Attribute VILA Lab versioned claims; polish zh-TW harness-designs - #74

Open
alecchen wants to merge 3 commits into
walkinglabs:mainfrom
alecchen:fix/harness-designs-polish
Open

alecchen wants to merge 3 commits into
walkinglabs:mainfrom
alecchen:fix/harness-designs-polish

Conversation

@alecchen

@alecchen alecchen commented Sep 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What changed

1. Say where the versioned numbers come from

harness-designs/claude-code (EN and zh-TW) presents a few architectural details as settled fact. They aren't. They come from VILA Lab's reverse-engineering report, which analyzed Claude Code v2.1.88 specifically, and Claude Code has shipped a lot since then.

I attributed the five-layer compaction pipeline and the seven permission modes to that v2.1.88 analysis and moved both to past tense. The permission-mode section now also says what the current docs list: Manual (renamed from "default" in v2.1.200+), Plan, acceptEdits, Auto, and bypassPermissions.

References are split into official Anthropic documentation and independent research, with a line noting that the second group describes one historical version.

The "In One Sentence" while-loop summary is untouched. It holds up, and Anthropic's own engineering post says the same thing.

2. zh-TW: Simplified characters that survived translation

In claude-code, codex, deepseek, and pi.

3. zh-TW: prose cleanup

Em-dashes removed, padding verbs trimmed, matching the plain-punctuation convention used elsewhere in the repo.

Other locales still carry the same unqualified VILA Lab numbers. Say the word and I'll do those too.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

alecchen and others added 3 commits September 10, 2026 23:51
Co-Authored-By: Claude Code <noreply@anthropic.com>
…verbs

Co-Authored-By: Claude Code <noreply@anthropic.com>
Qualify five-layer compaction and seven permission modes as v2.1.88 findings, flag current permission mode names, split references by authority.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Code <noreply@anthropic.com>
@alecchen
alecchen marked this pull request as ready for review September 10, 2026 16:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant