Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump nextest (miri) timeout: 360s -> 600s #1399

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 19, 2025
Merged

Conversation

Robbepop
Copy link
Member

@Robbepop Robbepop commented Mar 19, 2025

The miri CI jobs are very flaky since they often hit the timeout threshold.

This new timeout threshold that this PR nearly doubles should give us a bit of room.

The miri CI jobs are very flaky. This new timeout threshold that this PR nearly doubles should give us a bit of room.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 19, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 70.50%. Comparing base (c2f1ae9) to head (4b9a261).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1399      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   70.50%   70.50%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         156      156              
  Lines       14397    14397              
==========================================
- Hits        10151    10150       -1     
- Misses       4246     4247       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@Robbepop Robbepop merged commit a0d8b46 into main Mar 19, 2025
18 of 19 checks passed
@Robbepop Robbepop deleted the rf-bump-miri-ci-job-timeout branch March 19, 2025 10:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant