Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Modify the RAR signature to match RAR specification #144

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

gacelperfinian
Copy link

@gacelperfinian gacelperfinian commented May 28, 2021

This changes the RAR signature validation to correct deficiencies stated in #63 and to separate the signature used in RAR 4.x and RAR 5.0.

  • At least two implementers are interested (and none opposed):
  • Tests are written and can be reviewed and commented upon at:
  • Implementation bugs are filed:
    • Chrome: …
    • Firefox: …
    • Safari: …

(See WHATWG Working Mode: Changes for more details.)


Preview | Diff

This changes the RAR signature validation to correct deficiencies stated in whatwg#63 and to separate the signature used in RAR 4.x and RAR 5.0.
@annevk
Copy link
Member

annevk commented Sep 3, 2021

@gacelperfinian you'll need to sign https://participate.whatwg.org/agreement. It might also help to force push so the bots run again.

@GPHemsley Chrome only has one RAR signature right, but this PR adds multiple. It's not clear we have implementer agreement for such a change.

Copy link
Member

@GPHemsley GPHemsley left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@gacelperfinian The correction of the typo in the RAR 4.x signature is the desired change here. Please remove the addition of the RAR 5 signature, as that would warrant a separate discussion.

As stated in whatwg#144 (review):

> Please remove the addition of the RAR 5 signature, as that would warrant a separate discussion.
Copy link
Author

@gacelperfinian gacelperfinian left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@GPHemsley sorry for the delay due to personal circumstances. I've made the necessary change since as you pointed out, the popularity (or not) of RAR 5 files should warrant a separate review.

@annevk I've already submitted the contrib agreement but still awaiting WHATWG's verification.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants