Fix property descriptions in the quick reference #194
Conversation
|
Looks reasonable to me (well, we could bikeshed scheme/protocol, path/pathname and hash/fragment, but it probably doesn't matter in this context). Unfortunately I seem to not have been granted permission to review PRs since this was moved into whatwg. @domenic do you know what's required for that? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM unless we have bikeshedding.
@jeremyroman should have the permission to review (because I have the permission), maybe a setting mistake happened while the transfer?
|
#195 might be relevant here. Yes, both of you have the same permissions; Jeremy please try again? |
|
I was able to approve, but I'm still not authorized to merge PRs due to branch protection. |
|
I found a setting that seemed different between this and other standards. Give it a shot now? |
No description provided.