Summary
Fourteen topic records have names that describe a different skill from the rest of the record. I limited this list to cases where the description, evidence, assessment prompt, linked standards, and dependency reasons consistently point to the same replacement.
| Topic ID |
Current name |
Content-supported name |
mt_7IFpDVNsmt |
Classifying living things |
Gathering, Recording, Classifying and Presenting Data |
mt_rDjtmDogJr |
Classifying living things (age 9+) |
Recording Data and Results |
mt_bfhng6mOuy |
Angles in triangles (age 6+) |
Defining Attributes of Shapes |
mt_zuOGOGFAKb |
Angles in triangles (age 7+) |
Recognising and Drawing Shapes by Attributes |
mt_Xt1cRqaBOW |
Understanding angles (age 8+) |
Classifying Quadrilaterals |
mt_GzcJEVkNRn |
Understanding angles (age 8+) |
Area of Rectangles by Multiplication |
mt_tAJH5BrpOx |
Angles in triangles (age 11+) |
Perimeter, Area and Volume Formulae |
mt_1VmTUxBrNd |
Types of angles (age 13+) |
Applying Pythagoras' Theorem |
mt_y-BuQAfw4B |
Coordinates (age 12+) |
Similarity and Enlargement |
mt_vmW2cb5c7A |
Ratio (age 10+) |
Mental Calculation Strategies |
mt_X5cypSGoGU |
Ratio (age 11+) |
Priority of Operations |
mt_MCu_SNg_OW |
Arrays for multiplication (age 9+) |
Short Division with Remainders |
mt_r8XnXwRA6g |
Representing numbers with objects (age 8+) |
Scaled Picture and Bar Graphs |
mt_3tz3Otap5j |
Halves and quarters (age 7+) |
Money Word Problems |
Examples of the mismatch
mt_X5cypSGoGU is named “Ratio (age 11+)”, but its description and evidence are exclusively about BIDMAS, powers, roots, and operation priority; its linked UK standard is titled “Priority of Operations”.
mt_GzcJEVkNRn is named “Understanding angles (age 8+)”, but every content and dependency field concerns calculating rectangle area by multiplying side lengths.
mt_7IFpDVNsmt is named “Classifying living things”, while both linked UK standards and all content concern recording and presenting experimental data in tables, diagrams, and graphs.
The strongest pattern is an age-progression label apparently carrying onto a neighbouring curriculum skill: both Ratio records and both Classifying living things records are affected, as are several records in the angle-name families.
Suggested fix
Please update the source-of-truth/export step and regenerate the published data rather than hand-editing only this JSON snapshot. The stable IDs, descriptions, evidence, prompts, standards, and graph relationships can remain unchanged; only the corrupted names and resulting manifest checksum/byte count should need updating.
I can prepare the data PR once the intended source-of-truth workflow and names are confirmed.
Summary
Fourteen topic records have names that describe a different skill from the rest of the record. I limited this list to cases where the description, evidence, assessment prompt, linked standards, and dependency reasons consistently point to the same replacement.
mt_7IFpDVNsmtmt_rDjtmDogJrmt_bfhng6mOuymt_zuOGOGFAKbmt_Xt1cRqaBOWmt_GzcJEVkNRnmt_tAJH5BrpOxmt_1VmTUxBrNdmt_y-BuQAfw4Bmt_vmW2cb5c7Amt_X5cypSGoGUmt_MCu_SNg_OWmt_r8XnXwRA6gmt_3tz3Otap5jExamples of the mismatch
mt_X5cypSGoGUis named “Ratio (age 11+)”, but its description and evidence are exclusively about BIDMAS, powers, roots, and operation priority; its linked UK standard is titled “Priority of Operations”.mt_GzcJEVkNRnis named “Understanding angles (age 8+)”, but every content and dependency field concerns calculating rectangle area by multiplying side lengths.mt_7IFpDVNsmtis named “Classifying living things”, while both linked UK standards and all content concern recording and presenting experimental data in tables, diagrams, and graphs.The strongest pattern is an age-progression label apparently carrying onto a neighbouring curriculum skill: both
Ratiorecords and bothClassifying living thingsrecords are affected, as are several records in the angle-name families.Suggested fix
Please update the source-of-truth/export step and regenerate the published data rather than hand-editing only this JSON snapshot. The stable IDs, descriptions, evidence, prompts, standards, and graph relationships can remain unchanged; only the corrupted names and resulting manifest checksum/byte count should need updating.
I can prepare the data PR once the intended source-of-truth workflow and names are confirmed.