Improve request object clean up logic to avoid unnecessary delete requests

[sadilchamishka]

Proposed changes in this pull request

The request object tables get entries added for the authorization request object flow only. For the normal authorization flows, try to delete from request object tables is a cost.

• Improved authorization code revocation logics to pass the authz code and authz code-id which help to detect the flow is request object flow which help to avoid unnecessary operations.

When internal token clean up is disabled, tryin to delete the request objects from the relevant tables are unnecessary. Internal token clean ups are disabled to improve the performance at the runtime, but clean the tables as back office task.

• Call the request object handling for token-ids when internal token clean up is enabled.

The request object table has foreign key constraints with authz-code and access-token tables with on delete cascade approach except for the mssql database. Hence there is no need to delete the records via an event listener. Only for the MSSQL server databases, we can consider of invoking the listener. But ideally we could have improved it to delete via a trigger.

• Call the request object handling for token-ids only for mssql database type.

Related Issues

• DELETE FROM IDN_OIDC_REQ_OBJECT_REFERENCE ... queries wso2/product-is#21598

[jenkins-is-staging]

PR builder started
Link: https://github.com/wso2/product-is/actions/runs/11771052364

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 25.00000% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 55.95%. Comparing base (bc0033a) to head (f4b2b22).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...carbon/identity/oauth2/dao/AccessTokenDAOImpl.java	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
.../handlers/grant/AuthorizationCodeGrantHandler.java	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
...java/org/wso2/carbon/identity/oauth/OAuthUtil.java	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
.../identity/oauth2/dao/AuthorizationCodeDAOImpl.java	66.66%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #2623      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     55.96%   55.95%   -0.01%     
+ Complexity     8173     8169       -4     
============================================
  Files           632      632              
  Lines         46949    46949              
  Branches       7816     7816              
============================================
- Hits          26275    26272       -3     
- Misses        16893    16897       +4     
+ Partials       3781     3780       -1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit	38.62% <25.00%> (-0.06%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[jenkins-is-staging]

PR builder completed
Link: https://github.com/wso2/product-is/actions/runs/11771052364
Status: cancelled

[jenkins-is-staging]

PR builder started
Link: https://github.com/wso2/product-is/actions/runs/11772816968

[jenkins-is-staging]

PR builder completed
Link: https://github.com/wso2/product-is/actions/runs/11772816968
Status: success

[jenkins-is-staging]

Approving the pull request based on the successful pr build https://github.com/wso2/product-is/actions/runs/11772816968