Add terms extension specification#1986
Open
CameronWhiteside wants to merge 1 commit intox402-foundation:mainfrom
Open
Add terms extension specification#1986CameronWhiteside wants to merge 1 commit intox402-foundation:mainfrom
CameronWhiteside wants to merge 1 commit intox402-foundation:mainfrom
Conversation
|
@CameronWhiteside is attempting to deploy a commit to the Coinbase Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Adds the
termsextension, providing a channel for servers to communicate usage rights, obligations, and settlement terms alongside thePaymentRequiredresponse.exact,batch-settlement, or any future schemeuri,markdown,plaintext,jsonversionfield for change detectionSplit from #1145 for separate review per discussion with @CarsonRoscoe.
A note on scope
This extension defines how terms are communicated — not how they are consented to. The spec takes the implicit approach: terms are presented, and proceeding with payment implies awareness. Whether a network requires explicit consent (e.g., tying terms acceptance to a signed SIWX message) is a per-network or future-extension concern. The priority is establishing a standard channel for terms to be discoverable and machine-readable.
What's Included
specs/extensions/terms.mdTests
None — spec-only, no SDK implementation.
Checklist