Skip to content

mcux: kw45 Soc and Board Support #502

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sumitbatra-nxp
Copy link
Contributor

HAL support for KW45 SoC Family and KW45B41Z-EVK Board.

Copy link
Member

@dleach02 dleach02 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@sumitbatra-nxp we recently merged the SDK-NG PR update to the HAL. You need to rework this PR appropriately. I suspect the only thing needed in the HAL now for KW45 support is the pinctrl files.

@sumitbatra-nxp sumitbatra-nxp force-pushed the kw45-hal-nxp-upstream2 branch from d519d21 to 73b72c7 Compare May 11, 2025 04:56
In middleware included the support for multicore manager, connectivity framework
and adjusted the pinmux mask.

In the driver included clock and romapi support

Signed-off-by: Sumit Batra <[email protected]>
@sumitbatra-nxp sumitbatra-nxp force-pushed the kw45-hal-nxp-upstream2 branch from 73b72c7 to 05ac124 Compare May 11, 2025 05:03
@sumitbatra-nxp
Copy link
Contributor Author

sumitbatra-nxp commented May 11, 2025

@dleach02 .. Apologies for the delay.. Incorporated the changes..

@sumitbatra-nxp sumitbatra-nxp requested a review from dleach02 May 11, 2025 05:04
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this file contributed to upstream sdk repo?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this file contributed to upstream sdk repo?

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
#define KINETIS_MUX(port, pin, mux) \
(((((port) - 'A') & 0xF) << 28) | \
(((pin) & 0x3F) << 22) | \
(((mux) & 0x7) << 8))
(((mux) & 0xF) << 8))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Explain this change?

@decsny
Copy link
Member

decsny commented Jun 16, 2025

@sumitbatra-nxp is this still planned? the zephyr PR hasnt got any activity in 6 months

@sumitbatra-nxp
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sumitbatra-nxp is this still planned? the zephyr PR hasnt got any activity in 6 months

Yes.. this is planned.. Will update it tomorrow

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants