Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: ✨ WellbeingPromptEntity and DailyPromptRecordEntity #23

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Nov 12, 2024

Conversation

zhumeisongsong
Copy link
Owner

@zhumeisongsong zhumeisongsong commented Nov 12, 2024

related #22

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Introduced DailyPromptRecordEntity and WellbeingPromptEntity interfaces for structured data representation.
    • Added README files for both daily-prompt-record-entity and wellbeing-prompt-entity libraries, providing usage instructions.
  • Configuration Changes

    • New ESLint, Jest, and TypeScript configuration files for both libraries to improve code quality and testing processes.
  • Documentation

    • Enhanced documentation with new README files for better developer guidance.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved type safety and validation in the DailyPromptRecordEntity and WellbeingPromptEntity test suites.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 12, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@zhumeisongsong has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 12 minutes and 46 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a55ad8b and b90e583.

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces new components and configurations for two libraries: daily-prompt-record-entity and wellbeing-prompt-entity. Each library now includes a README file, ESLint configuration, Jest configuration, TypeScript configurations, and project metadata. Additionally, the daily-prompt-record-entity library features a new interface and test suite, while the wellbeing-prompt-entity library introduces a new type and interface. Path mappings for both libraries have also been added to the base TypeScript configuration to facilitate module resolution.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
libs/prompt/domain/daily-prompt-record-entity/README.md New README file created.
libs/prompt/domain/daily-prompt-record-entity/eslint.config.js New ESLint configuration file added.
libs/prompt/domain/daily-prompt-record-entity/jest.config.ts New Jest configuration file added.
libs/prompt/domain/daily-prompt-record-entity/project.json New project configuration file added.
libs/prompt/domain/daily-prompt-record-entity/src/index.ts Exported all entities from ./lib/daily-prompt-record-entity.
libs/prompt/domain/daily-prompt-record-entity/src/lib/daily-prompt-record-entity.spec.ts New test suite for DailyPromptRecordEntity created.
libs/prompt/domain/daily-prompt-record-entity/src/lib/daily-prompt-record-entity.ts New interface DailyPromptRecordEntity defined.
libs/prompt/domain/daily-prompt-record-entity/tsconfig.json New TypeScript configuration file added.
libs/prompt/domain/daily-prompt-record-entity/tsconfig.lib.json New TypeScript library configuration file added.
libs/prompt/domain/daily-prompt-record-entity/tsconfig.spec.json New TypeScript specification configuration file added.
libs/prompt/domain/wellbeing-prompt-entity/README.md New README file created.
libs/prompt/domain/wellbeing-prompt-entity/eslint.config.js New ESLint configuration file added.
libs/prompt/domain/wellbeing-prompt-entity/jest.config.ts New Jest configuration file added.
libs/prompt/domain/wellbeing-prompt-entity/project.json New project configuration file added.
libs/prompt/domain/wellbeing-prompt-entity/src/index.ts Exported all entities from ./lib/wellbeing-prompt-entity.
libs/prompt/domain/wellbeing-prompt-entity/src/lib/wellbeing-prompt-entity.spec.ts New test suite for WellbeingPromptEntity created.
libs/prompt/domain/wellbeing-prompt-entity/src/lib/wellbeing-prompt-entity.ts New type WellbeingCategory and interface WellbeingPromptEntity defined.
libs/prompt/domain/wellbeing-prompt-entity/tsconfig.json New TypeScript configuration file added.
libs/prompt/domain/wellbeing-prompt-entity/tsconfig.lib.json New TypeScript library configuration file added.
libs/prompt/domain/wellbeing-prompt-entity/tsconfig.spec.json New TypeScript specification configuration file added.
tsconfig.base.json Path mappings for @prompt/daily-prompt-record-entity and @prompt/wellbeing-prompt-entity added.

Possibly related PRs

  • feat: ✨ add applicaiton config #7: The changes in this PR include the addition of a new application configuration, which is relevant as it may define settings that affect the daily-prompt-record-entity library's behavior or integration within the overall application.
  • feat: ✨ Initial graphql federation: users application #14: This PR introduces the initial setup for GraphQL federation, which could relate to how the daily-prompt-record-entity library interacts with other services in a federated architecture, potentially impacting its usage or configuration.

🐰 In the garden where prompts bloom,
New files sprout, dispelling gloom.
With tests and types, we hop with glee,
Daily and wellbeing, come see, come see!
Configuration set, paths align,
In our code, all will be fine! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
libs/prompt/domain/daily-prompt-record-entity/src/lib/daily-prompt-record-entity.ts (1)

1-7: Add JSDoc documentation for better maintainability

Please add documentation to explain the purpose of this entity and its properties. This will help other developers understand how to use this interface correctly.

+/**
+ * Represents a daily prompt record for a user.
+ */
 export interface DailyPromptRecordEntity {
+  /** Unique identifier for the prompt record */
   id: string;
+  /** Reference to the associated prompt */
   promptId: string;
+  /** Reference to the user who received this prompt */
   userId: string;
+  /** Timestamp when the prompt record was created */
   createdAt: Date;
+  /** Timestamp when the user completed the prompt */
   completedAt?: Date;
 }
libs/prompt/domain/wellbeing-prompt-entity/src/lib/wellbeing-prompt-entity.ts (2)

1-10: Export and organize WellbeingCategory type

The type definition looks good, but consider these improvements:

  1. Add export statement to make it reusable
  2. Consider organizing categories alphabetically for better maintenance
-type WellbeingCategory = 
+export type WellbeingCategory = 
-  | 'physical'  
-  | 'mental'    
-  | 'social'    
-  | 'emotional' 
-  | 'mindfulness' 
-  | 'productivity' 
-  | 'self-care' 
-  | 'gratitude' 
-  | 'creativity'; 
+  | 'creativity'
+  | 'emotional'
+  | 'gratitude'
+  | 'mental'
+  | 'mindfulness'
+  | 'physical'
+  | 'productivity'
+  | 'self-care'
+  | 'social';

12-17: Add documentation and consider validation constraints

The interface structure is good, but could benefit from:

  1. JSDoc documentation explaining the entity's purpose and properties
  2. Consider adding validation constraints using decorators if you're using class-validator
+/**
+ * Represents a wellbeing prompt entity that contains content and categorization
+ * for various aspects of personal wellbeing.
+ */
 export interface WellbeingPromptEntity {
+  /** Unique identifier for the prompt */
   id: string;
+  /** The actual prompt text content */
   content: string;
+  /** Category classifying the type of wellbeing this prompt addresses */
   category: WellbeingCategory;
+  /** Timestamp when this prompt was created */
   createdAt: Date;
 }

If you're using class-validator, consider implementing this as a class with validation:

import { IsDate, IsEnum, IsString, IsUUID, MinLength } from 'class-validator';

export class WellbeingPromptEntity {
  @IsUUID()
  id: string;

  @IsString()
  @MinLength(1)
  content: string;

  @IsEnum(WellbeingCategory)
  category: WellbeingCategory;

  @IsDate()
  createdAt: Date;
}
libs/prompt/domain/wellbeing-prompt-entity/src/lib/wellbeing-prompt-entity.spec.ts (1)

1-1: Consider using type import for WellbeingPromptEntity

Since WellbeingPromptEntity appears to be a type/interface, consider using a type import for better clarity and tree-shaking.

-import { WellbeingPromptEntity } from './wellbeing-prompt-entity';
+import type { WellbeingPromptEntity } from './wellbeing-prompt-entity';
libs/prompt/domain/daily-prompt-record-entity/src/lib/daily-prompt-record-entity.spec.ts (2)

4-18: Consider enhancing property validation tests.

While the basic property checks are good, consider these improvements:

  1. Add validation for required vs optional properties
  2. Extract test data to reduce duplication
  3. Use more efficient property validation

Consider this refactor:

+const createTestRecord = () => ({
+  id: '1',
+  promptId: 'prompt1',
+  userId: 'user1',
+  createdAt: new Date(),
+  completedAt: new Date(),
+});

 it('should have all required properties', () => {
-  const record: DailyPromptRecordEntity = {
-    id: '1',
-    promptId: 'prompt1',
-    userId: 'user1',
-    createdAt: new Date(),
-    completedAt: new Date(),
-  };
+  const record = createTestRecord();
+  const requiredProps = ['id', 'promptId', 'userId', 'createdAt', 'completedAt'];
 
-  expect(record).toHaveProperty('id');
-  expect(record).toHaveProperty('promptId');
-  expect(record).toHaveProperty('userId');
-  expect(record).toHaveProperty('createdAt');
-  expect(record).toHaveProperty('completedAt');
+  requiredProps.forEach(prop => {
+    expect(record).toHaveProperty(prop);
+    expect(record[prop]).not.toBeNull();
+    expect(record[prop]).not.toBeUndefined();
+  });
 });

20-34: Enhance type validation with edge cases and format checks.

The type checks are good, but consider adding:

  1. Edge case testing (null, undefined)
  2. Format validation for IDs (e.g., UUID)
  3. Date range constraints

Consider this enhancement:

 it('should have correct types for properties', () => {
-  const record: DailyPromptRecordEntity = {
-    id: '1',
-    promptId: 'prompt1',
-    userId: 'user1',
-    createdAt: new Date(),
-    completedAt: new Date(),
-  };
+  const record = createTestRecord();
 
   expect(typeof record.id).toBe('string');
+  expect(record.id).toMatch(/^[0-9a-f-]+$/); // UUID format
   expect(typeof record.promptId).toBe('string');
   expect(typeof record.userId).toBe('string');
   expect(record.createdAt).toBeInstanceOf(Date);
   expect(record.completedAt).toBeInstanceOf(Date);
+  expect(record.completedAt.getTime()).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(record.createdAt.getTime());
 });

+it('should validate date constraints', () => {
+  const record = createTestRecord();
+  const futureDate = new Date();
+  futureDate.setFullYear(futureDate.getFullYear() + 1);
+
+  expect(() => ({
+    ...record,
+    completedAt: futureDate
+  })).toThrow(); // Assuming there's validation in the entity
+});
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0c3348e and a55ad8b.

📒 Files selected for processing (21)
  • libs/prompt/domain/daily-prompt-record-entity/README.md (1 hunks)
  • libs/prompt/domain/daily-prompt-record-entity/eslint.config.js (1 hunks)
  • libs/prompt/domain/daily-prompt-record-entity/jest.config.ts (1 hunks)
  • libs/prompt/domain/daily-prompt-record-entity/project.json (1 hunks)
  • libs/prompt/domain/daily-prompt-record-entity/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • libs/prompt/domain/daily-prompt-record-entity/src/lib/daily-prompt-record-entity.spec.ts (1 hunks)
  • libs/prompt/domain/daily-prompt-record-entity/src/lib/daily-prompt-record-entity.ts (1 hunks)
  • libs/prompt/domain/daily-prompt-record-entity/tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
  • libs/prompt/domain/daily-prompt-record-entity/tsconfig.lib.json (1 hunks)
  • libs/prompt/domain/daily-prompt-record-entity/tsconfig.spec.json (1 hunks)
  • libs/prompt/domain/wellbeing-prompt-entity/README.md (1 hunks)
  • libs/prompt/domain/wellbeing-prompt-entity/eslint.config.js (1 hunks)
  • libs/prompt/domain/wellbeing-prompt-entity/jest.config.ts (1 hunks)
  • libs/prompt/domain/wellbeing-prompt-entity/project.json (1 hunks)
  • libs/prompt/domain/wellbeing-prompt-entity/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • libs/prompt/domain/wellbeing-prompt-entity/src/lib/wellbeing-prompt-entity.spec.ts (1 hunks)
  • libs/prompt/domain/wellbeing-prompt-entity/src/lib/wellbeing-prompt-entity.ts (1 hunks)
  • libs/prompt/domain/wellbeing-prompt-entity/tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
  • libs/prompt/domain/wellbeing-prompt-entity/tsconfig.lib.json (1 hunks)
  • libs/prompt/domain/wellbeing-prompt-entity/tsconfig.spec.json (1 hunks)
  • tsconfig.base.json (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (16)
  • libs/prompt/domain/daily-prompt-record-entity/README.md
  • libs/prompt/domain/daily-prompt-record-entity/eslint.config.js
  • libs/prompt/domain/daily-prompt-record-entity/jest.config.ts
  • libs/prompt/domain/daily-prompt-record-entity/project.json
  • libs/prompt/domain/daily-prompt-record-entity/src/index.ts
  • libs/prompt/domain/daily-prompt-record-entity/tsconfig.json
  • libs/prompt/domain/daily-prompt-record-entity/tsconfig.lib.json
  • libs/prompt/domain/daily-prompt-record-entity/tsconfig.spec.json
  • libs/prompt/domain/wellbeing-prompt-entity/README.md
  • libs/prompt/domain/wellbeing-prompt-entity/eslint.config.js
  • libs/prompt/domain/wellbeing-prompt-entity/jest.config.ts
  • libs/prompt/domain/wellbeing-prompt-entity/project.json
  • libs/prompt/domain/wellbeing-prompt-entity/src/index.ts
  • libs/prompt/domain/wellbeing-prompt-entity/tsconfig.json
  • libs/prompt/domain/wellbeing-prompt-entity/tsconfig.lib.json
  • libs/prompt/domain/wellbeing-prompt-entity/tsconfig.spec.json
🔇 Additional comments (6)
libs/prompt/domain/wellbeing-prompt-entity/src/lib/wellbeing-prompt-entity.ts (1)

1-17: Verify consistency with other domain entities

Let's ensure this implementation follows the same patterns as other domain entities in the codebase.

✅ Verification successful

Implementation is consistent with domain patterns

The WellbeingPromptEntity follows the same patterns as other domain entities in the codebase:

  • Uses interface-based entity definition like DailyPromptRecordEntity
  • Follows consistent naming convention with -entity suffix
  • Has similar basic properties structure including id and timestamps
  • Neither entity uses class-validator decorators, maintaining consistency
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check patterns used in other domain entities

# Find all domain entity files
echo "Looking for other domain entities..."
fd -e ts -p "domain/.+entity\.ts$"

# Check for validation patterns
echo -e "\nChecking validation patterns..."
rg -l "class-validator" "libs/*/domain"

# Check documentation patterns
echo -e "\nChecking documentation patterns..."
rg "export (interface|class|type)" -A 3 "libs/*/domain"

Length of output: 651


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the daily prompt record entity and compare patterns
cat libs/prompt/domain/daily-prompt-record-entity/src/lib/daily-prompt-record-entity.ts

# Also check for any other interfaces/types in the domain
rg "export (interface|class|type)" -A 3 "libs/prompt/domain/"

# Look for any validation decorators or patterns
rg "class-validator" "libs/prompt/domain/"

Length of output: 1179

tsconfig.base.json (2)

21-25: LGTM! Path mappings follow consistent structure.

The new path mappings for prompt entities follow the established pattern and are well-organized under the prompt domain.


21-25: Verify the existence of referenced paths and index files.

Let's ensure the new module paths and their index files are properly set up.

✅ Verification successful

All paths and index files are properly set up

The verification confirms:

  • Both directories exist: daily-prompt-record-entity and wellbeing-prompt-entity
  • Both index files exist and properly export their respective entities
  • The exports follow the expected pattern of exporting from their lib directories
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of new module paths and their index files

# Check if the directories exist
echo "Checking directories..."
for dir in "libs/prompt/domain/daily-prompt-record-entity" "libs/prompt/domain/wellbeing-prompt-entity"; do
  if [ -d "$dir" ]; then
    echo "✓ Directory exists: $dir"
  else
    echo "✗ Missing directory: $dir"
  fi
done

# Check if the index files exist and export entities
echo -e "\nChecking index files..."
for file in "libs/prompt/domain/daily-prompt-record-entity/src/index.ts" "libs/prompt/domain/wellbeing-prompt-entity/src/index.ts"; do
  if [ -f "$file" ]; then
    echo "✓ Index file exists: $file"
    echo "Contents of $file:"
    cat "$file"
  else
    echo "✗ Missing index file: $file"
  fi
done

Length of output: 1985

libs/prompt/domain/wellbeing-prompt-entity/src/lib/wellbeing-prompt-entity.spec.ts (1)

19-30: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix critical issues in error testing

The current error test has several issues:

  1. Creating an invalid object with type assertion doesn't trigger runtime validation
  2. The function doesn't actually throw an error
  3. The test doesn't verify specific error type or message

Here's a suggested fix:

it('should throw an error if category is invalid', () => {
  expect(() => {
    // Assuming there's a constructor or factory method
    new WellbeingPromptEntity({
      id: '2',
      content: 'Meditate for 10 minutes.',
      category: 'invalid-category',
      createdAt: new Date(),
    });
  }).toThrow('Invalid category. Expected one of: [list of valid categories]');
});

Let's verify if there's a validation mechanism in the entity:

libs/prompt/domain/daily-prompt-record-entity/src/lib/daily-prompt-record-entity.spec.ts (2)

1-3: LGTM! Clean import and well-structured test suite.

The import statement correctly uses the type keyword for TypeScript, and the test suite follows Jest naming conventions.


1-35: Consider adding test cases for error scenarios and business rules.

The test suite would benefit from additional test cases:

  1. Error scenarios (invalid data)
  2. Business rule validations (if any)
  3. Integration with related entities (if applicable)

Let's check for any business rules in the implementation:

Consider organizing tests into logical groups using describe blocks for different aspects (validation, business rules, error cases).

@zhumeisongsong zhumeisongsong merged commit 53ff0e7 into main Nov 12, 2024
5 checks passed
@zhumeisongsong zhumeisongsong deleted the feature/domain-prompt branch November 12, 2024 09:28
@zhumeisongsong zhumeisongsong changed the title ✨ WellbeingPromptEntity and DailyPromptRecordEntity feat: ✨ WellbeingPromptEntity and DailyPromptRecordEntity Nov 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant