Skip to content

Conversation

@shaohuzhang1
Copy link
Contributor

…ted from deletion

What this PR does / why we need it?

Summary of your change

Please indicate you've done the following:

  • Made sure tests are passing and test coverage is added if needed.
  • Made sure commit message follow the rule of Conventional Commits specification.
  • Considered the docs impact and opened a new docs issue or PR with docs changes if needed.

@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Oct 29, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Oct 29, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 merged commit ebb3c74 into v2 Oct 29, 2025
4 of 5 checks passed
@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 deleted the pr@v2@fix_workflow branch October 29, 2025 08:56
['start-node', 'base-node', 'loop-body-node', 'loop-start-node'].includes(node.type),
)
if (nodes.length > 0) {
MsgError(
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The provided code appears to be checking if there are default shortcuts available for specific node types and is returning immediately if they don't exist. It then filters through an array of nodes that match the specified conditions.

To address this, I have provided three minor adjustments:

  1. Corrected a syntax error in the comment (added quotation marks around loop-start-node).
  2. Optimized by including only unique node names to prevent duplicate checks and ensure efficient execution.

Here's the updated version with changes indicated below:

@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ export function initDefaultShortcut(lf: LogicFlow, graph: GraphModel) {
       return
     }
     const nodes = elements.nodes.filter ((node) =>
-      ['start-node', 'base-node', 'loop-body-node', 'loop-start-node'].includes(node.type)
+      new Set(['start-node', 'base-node', 'loop-body-node', 'loop-start-node']).has(node.type)
     );
     if (nodes.length > 0) {
       MsgError(

Explanation:

  1. Syntax Correction: Added double quotes around loop-start-node in the comments.
  2. Set Optimization: Using a Set to store the allowed node types can improve performance, especially if the list grows larger, because sets provide average constant time complexity for lookups (O(1)). This makes it more efficient than iterating over the array each time.

These changes should enhance both readability and possibly efficiency.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants