Skip to content

Conversation

@vickgoodman
Copy link
Contributor

Implemented LICENSE.APPROVED - #45

  • Added check
  • Added fix
  • Added tests

Copy link
Member

@neatudarius neatudarius left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall LGTM, but we have some details to figure out which may change the implementation for LICENSE.APPROVED, LICENSE.APACHE_LLVM and LICENSE.CRITERIA.

Copy link
Member

@neatudarius neatudarius left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Setting proper status for this PR. We have a lead approve plan for LICENSE.* (https://github.com/bemanproject/infra/pull/135#discussion_r2210507761). We'll continue in that direction.

@vickgoodman vickgoodman marked this pull request as draft July 17, 2025 08:45
Copy link
Member

@neatudarius neatudarius left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

here is a chunk of comments for tests

Copy link
Member

@neatudarius neatudarius left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

here is my request related to the actual check implementation

[beman-tidy] Prettier regex with textwrap
Copy link
Member

@neatudarius neatudarius left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

@neatudarius neatudarius marked this pull request as ready for review July 18, 2025 08:51
@vickgoodman vickgoodman merged commit 79d4922 into bemanproject:main Jul 18, 2025
4 checks passed
wusatosi pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2025
….APPROVED

[beman-tidy] Implement LICENSE.APPROVED
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants