[arvindfroi]

What

Follow-up to #1144, which named the scePsmlMfsr* stubs and left the 9 scePsmlMfsr2Unknown_* ones because the NID database has no names for them. The names were found by hashing candidate names built from the existing scePsmlMfsr* names, and each one is checked with both compute_nid in tools/nid_names.py and Nid::ComputeNid in core/libs/nid/src/NidCompute.cpp:

NID	Name
0GAw7SmkwII	scePsmlMfsr2ReleaseSharedResources
1ic5q-kdOsc	scePsmlMfsr2GetSharedResourcesInitRequirement
5z2gBlqxJ+0	scePsmlMfsr2GetContextInitRequirement
Kyy1baXgaVU	scePsmlMfsr2ReleaseContext
ZLL31lzzxr4	scePsmlMfsr2GetDispatchPacketsSizeInDwords
gMduXCLYrNg	scePsmlMfsr2CreateSharedResources
lrJwpLjKXRc	scePsmlMfsr2GetDispatchPackets
m9JLPc3wOQw	scePsmlMfsr2CreateContext
o+NM86gEwFE	scePsmlMfsr2Init

The stubs drop APS5_EXPORT and use these names, so the generated NIDs are unchanged and NotImplemented failures name the real function. Behaviour is unchanged. The TechnicalDebt entry now lists the names; the signatures are still unknown.

Check:

python3 -c "import sys; sys.path.insert(0,'tools'); from nid_names import compute_nid; print(compute_nid('scePsmlMfsr2Init'))"
o+NM86gEwFE

Tested

tools/nid_names.py no longer lists any libScePsml_debug NID. tools/check_conventions.py --base origin/main passes. clang++ -fsyntax-only on the file has no errors. No x86-64 toolchain on this machine (Apple Silicon), so the build is left to CI. No title tested.

Checklist

• Based on current main; no other open PR implements the same functions
• One topic per PR; follow-ups go in a new PR
• No comments in code except technical debt
• Unimplemented paths throw (NotImplemented_nid_no_patch); silent stubs are listed in TechnicalDebt
• No notes, investigation .md files or images added to the repository (attach them to this PR)
• New third-party code is a submodule built from source
• Generic behaviour, not specific to one title
• Depends on: none
• AI-assisted: yes (Claude Code, Claude Opus 5.5)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[github-actions]

Other open pull requests touch the same code. Merging one will break the other, or both implement the same thing. If this one builds on them, list them in Depends on.

Pull request	Conflicting files (lines on main)	Same exports	Same new files
#1498	core/libs/prx/libScePsml_debug/Export.cpp L98-101, L104-107, L110-113, L116-119, L122-125, L128-131, L134-137, L140-143, L146-149

[adriadam10]

Checked the nine names against compute_nid (tools/nid_names.py): all match their NIDs. Diff only renames the stubs and updates the TechnicalDebt line; behaviour unchanged. Local build + ctest on top of current main: 459/459 passed. Merging once CI is green.

Note: #1498 rewrites the same nine stubs, so it will need to rebase after this lands.