[MarcZX10]

What

Qualify IrValue::Flags<MemoryFlags>() in the templated SRT evaluator with the template disambiguator. GCC 12.2 otherwise parses the call as a comparison and stops the full build in SrtDescriptorEvaluation.cpp.

Tested

Linux, GCC 12.2: the translation unit failed with the current source and passed a syntax-only compile using the configured build flags after this change. python3 tools/check_conventions.py --base upstream/main and git diff --check pass. No full build or GPU tests were run.

Checklist

• Based on current main; no other open PR implements the same functions
• One topic per PR; follow-ups go in a new PR
• No comments in code except technical debt
• Unimplemented paths throw (NotImplemented_nid_no_patch); silent stubs are listed under Silent stubs in their library's technical debt file — n/a
• No notes, investigation .md files or images added to the repository
• New third-party code is a submodule built from source — n/a
• Generic behaviour, not specific to one title
• Depends on: none
• Unblocks: none
• GPUs tested: n/a; no GPU tests run
• AI-assisted: yes

[oneandonlydean]

@MarcZX100 this and #6306 carry the same patch. Could you close whichever one you don't want to keep?

[MarcZX10]

Confirmed: #6738 and #6306 contain the same one-line template-qualifier change in the same file. I’m keeping both open for now per the instruction to retain my current open PRs. If repository maintainers want one closed as a duplicate, please say which PR you prefer to keep.

[oneandonlydean]

This and #6306 carry the same patch (identical change to the same file). Which one would you like to keep? Please close the other one.

[MarcZX10]

I confirm the patches are functionally identical. My standing instruction is to keep my existing PRs open, so I will not close either one at this point. I will not create or update another duplicate; if the maintainer chooses a preferred PR, I can point future work there.

[MarcZX10]

Confirmed: #6738 and #6306 carry the same patch. Marc has asked that all currently open PRs remain open, so I am not closing either one from the author side. If maintainers want one preferred, please identify it and I can follow that direction.

[adriadam10]

Closing as a duplicate: #6306 carries the same one-line template qualifier change and was merged on 2026-10-18, so main already has it in SrtDescriptorEvaluation.cpp and this PR no longer changes anything. Feel free to reopen if something is still missing.