-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
Remove Closure use, before it's introduced #92
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Remove the min parameter from makeFilter and hardcode the filter threshold inside the nested filter function. Update calls to makeFilter accordingly and remove the second filter instance and its usage. This change simplifies the function interface and test code, focusing on a single filter threshold for clarity.
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@ryan-gang has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 13 minutes and 16 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
WalkthroughThe function Changes
Estimated code review effort2 (~15 minutes) Poem
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
test_programs/f6/4.lox (1)
32-32: Inconsistent placeholder formats in expression.The expression
<<RANDOM_INTEGER_1>> + <<RANDOM_DIGIT>>mixes two different placeholder formats. For consistency and clarity:
<<RANDOM_INTEGER_1>>matches the format used in line 9<<RANDOM_DIGIT>>uses a different naming conventionConsider standardizing the placeholder format across the entire file.
Should all placeholders follow the same naming convention (e.g.,
<<RANDOM_INTEGER_1>>and<<RANDOM_INTEGER_2>>)?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test_programs/f6/4.lox(2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: test
🔇 Additional comments (3)
test_programs/f6/4.lox (3)
7-7: LGTM: Function signature simplified to remove closure parameter.This change successfully removes the
minparameter that would have been captured by the closure, aligning with the PR objective of removing closure use.
9-9: Verify placeholder replacement strategy.The hardcoded
<<RANDOM_INTEGER_1>>successfully removes closure variable access, but this placeholder needs clarification:
- Is this intended to remain as a template placeholder?
- Should it be replaced with an actual integer value?
- The placeholder syntax is not valid Lox code if executed as-is.
Ensure the placeholder replacement strategy aligns with the test program's intended usage.
29-29: LGTM: Function call updated consistently with signature change.The function call correctly removes the argument to match the updated
makeFilter()signature, maintaining consistency across the codebase.
|
Triggered a Github Actions job to update fixtures. |
Remove the min parameter from makeFilter and hardcode the filter value to 54. Update test cases to use the new makeFilter signature and remove redundant tests for different thresholds. This change simplifies the test fixture and focuses on a single filtering criterion, reducing test output and improving clarity.
|
Note: @ryan-gang to update stage descriptions after merging this in. |
Summary by CodeRabbit