Skip to content

Conversation

@ryan-gang
Copy link
Contributor

@ryan-gang ryan-gang commented Jul 21, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Simplified filter creation by removing the parameter from the filter function.
    • Reduced multiple filter usages to a single filter and updated related function calls.

Remove the min parameter from makeFilter and hardcode the filter
threshold inside the nested filter function. Update calls to
makeFilter accordingly and remove the second filter instance and its
usage. This change simplifies the function interface and test code,
focusing on a single filter threshold for clarity.
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 21, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@ryan-gang has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 13 minutes and 16 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 66a4d4c and 9704c6f.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • internal/test_helpers/fixtures/pass_functions (3 hunks)
  • internal/test_helpers/fixtures/pass_functions_final (3 hunks)

Walkthrough

The function makeFilter in test_programs/f6/4.lox was modified to remove its parameter, and its internal logic now uses a fixed constant for comparison. Corresponding test fixtures were updated to reflect this change, simplifying calls from two filters to one and reducing expected output lines. Clock test outputs were also refreshed.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
test_programs/f6/4.lox Refactored makeFilter to take no parameters; updated internal comparison; removed duplicate filter, print, and function calls; adjusted logic to use a single filter and updated count.
internal/test_helpers/fixtures/pass_functions Updated clock output timestamps; modified makeFilter test case to match new no-parameter signature and fixed filtering; reduced output lines from 14 to 7.
internal/test_helpers/fixtures/pass_functions_final Updated clock output timestamps; changed makeFilter test case to no-parameter version with fixed filter constant; removed second filter call; reduced expected output lines.

Estimated code review effort

2 (~15 minutes)

Poem

A filter once took values, but now it stands alone,
No arguments to ponder, just a constant on its throne.
Two filters merged to one, the clutter swept away—
Simpler code for rabbits to hop through and play!
🐇✨


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
test_programs/f6/4.lox (1)

32-32: Inconsistent placeholder formats in expression.

The expression <<RANDOM_INTEGER_1>> + <<RANDOM_DIGIT>> mixes two different placeholder formats. For consistency and clarity:

  • <<RANDOM_INTEGER_1>> matches the format used in line 9
  • <<RANDOM_DIGIT>> uses a different naming convention

Consider standardizing the placeholder format across the entire file.

Should all placeholders follow the same naming convention (e.g., <<RANDOM_INTEGER_1>> and <<RANDOM_INTEGER_2>>)?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 05a6fbc and 9f058fc.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • test_programs/f6/4.lox (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: test
🔇 Additional comments (3)
test_programs/f6/4.lox (3)

7-7: LGTM: Function signature simplified to remove closure parameter.

This change successfully removes the min parameter that would have been captured by the closure, aligning with the PR objective of removing closure use.


9-9: Verify placeholder replacement strategy.

The hardcoded <<RANDOM_INTEGER_1>> successfully removes closure variable access, but this placeholder needs clarification:

  • Is this intended to remain as a template placeholder?
  • Should it be replaced with an actual integer value?
  • The placeholder syntax is not valid Lox code if executed as-is.

Ensure the placeholder replacement strategy aligns with the test program's intended usage.


29-29: LGTM: Function call updated consistently with signature change.

The function call correctly removes the argument to match the updated makeFilter() signature, maintaining consistency across the codebase.

@ryan-gang ryan-gang self-assigned this Jul 21, 2025
@ryan-gang ryan-gang added the regenerate-fixtures Trigger a Cl job to regenerate fixtures label Jul 21, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

Triggered a Github Actions job to update fixtures.

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the regenerate-fixtures Trigger a Cl job to regenerate fixtures label Jul 21, 2025
Remove the min parameter from makeFilter and hardcode the filter value to 54.
Update test cases to use the new makeFilter signature and remove redundant tests
for different thresholds. This change simplifies the test fixture and focuses on
a single filtering criterion, reducing test output and improving clarity.
@ryan-gang
Copy link
Contributor Author

Note: @ryan-gang to update stage descriptions after merging this in.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants