feat: Add GitHub two new Secret Scanning API endpoints

[Not-Dhananjay-Mishra]

This PR adds support for two new Secret Scanning API endpoints that are currently missing from the go-github library

Implement

POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/secret-scanning/push-protection-bypasses
GET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/secret-scanning/scan-history

Changes

• Add CreatePushProtectionBypass method
• Add GetScanHistory method
• Made two new struct for PushProtectionBypasses method - PushProtectionBypassRequest and PushProtectionBypass
• Made three new struct for ScanHistory method - Scan, CustomPatternScan and SecretScanningResponse

Issue - #3686

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 91.10%. Comparing base (3a062d1) to head (c7213dc).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3687      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   91.08%   91.10%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         187      187              
  Lines       16581    16607      +26     
==========================================
+ Hits        15103    15129      +26     
  Misses       1293     1293              
  Partials      185      185              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[Not-Dhananjay-Mishra]

@alexandear Thanks for the suggestions. I have changed the method names. Please let me know if you have any other suggestions.

[gmlewis]

Thank you, @Not-Dhananjay-Mishra.
This is a good start. Please address the findings and then we should be ready for a second LGTM+Approval from any other contributor to this repo before merging.

[Not-Dhananjay-Mishra]

Thanks @gmlewis for the feedback! I have fixed all the findings. Sorry for the extra back and forth code review.

[gmlewis]

Thank you, @Not-Dhananjay-Mishra!
LGTM.
Awaiting second LGTM+Approval from any other contributor to this repo before merging.

[alexandear]

Suggested change

	var reponsePushProtectionBypass *PushProtectionBypass
	var responsePushProtectionBypass *PushProtectionBypass

[Not-Dhananjay-Mishra]

Thanks @alexandear for spotting that! That was an accidental typo. I've fixed it.

[gmlewis]

Just FYI - suddenly I have lost write access to this repo, like in #3689... so I can no longer approve the workflows and need to find out what is going on... this may take some time to resolve... I apologize for the inconvenience.