-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
Run DIGSY/transport scenarios for 2025-W36 #415
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
khaeru
wants to merge
70
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
transport/2025-w36-digsy
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Replace usage of "RAIL", "ROAD" that was ambiguous with e.g. "P RAIL". - Update .transport.other. - Update input data files.
Data extracted from the FinalModifiers_Transport_v8 file received from Charlie These include the now extended list of scenarios (C= conservative, S = Strectch)
-C = Cautious
swap usual SSP2 values for DIGSY-BEST-S scenario values
These are pretty extreme
Here the minimum value is fixed at 1.1
Increasing the VDT per year for R12_WEU to see if it affects LDV CAP_NEW & Stock over time
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #415 +/- ##
=======================================
- Coverage 77.1% 75.9% -1.3%
=======================================
Files 250 250
Lines 20198 20200 +2
=======================================
- Hits 15589 15346 -243
- Misses 4609 4854 +245
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
make the pdt numbers integers and not floats
keep pt per mode values as integers
LDV pdt-cap values come from PASTA, other modes are from our SSP2
7 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR/branch:
How to review
N/A
PR checklist
Continuous integration checks all ✅Will not be merged.Add or expand tests; coverage checks both ✅Add, expand, or update documentation.Update doc/whatsnew.