-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.5k
[clang][CodeGen] Set dead_on_return
when passing arguments indirectly
#148159
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
antoniofrighetto
merged 1 commit into
llvm:main
from
antoniofrighetto:feature/clang-dead-on-return
Jul 18, 2025
+887
−873
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please use:
We do destroy parameters in the callee in several situations. The most important example is the MSVC C++ ABI, but I believe that coincidentally never uses indirect argument passing, so it wouldn't be testable. The testable example would be something like this in Objective-C++:
__weak
helpfully forces the struct to be passed indirectly, but you could also just use a__strong id ref;
in a struct that's big enough to be passed indirectly on the target.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for clarifying this, updated it. Tests updated too (it indeed looks like from the tests that some MSVC callee-destroyed objects, which are passed indirectly, should be dead_on_return. So is the case for Obj-C++ structs, as mentioned, with __weak and __strong references, as per
objc-struct-cxx-abi.mm
andptrauth-struct-cxx-abi.mm
tests).