-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.6k
[clang][deps] Properly capture the global module and '\n' for all module directives #148685
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
naveen-seth
merged 6 commits into
llvm:main
from
naveen-seth:dep-directive-scanner-global-module
Jul 19, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7a75927
[clang][deps] Recognize 'module;' in dependency directive scanner
naveen-seth 25553f7
Add newline after 'module;' to be valid C++
naveen-seth 586b438
[clang][deps] Properly capture the global module and '\n' for all mod…
naveen-seth e9a6b45
Address akyrtzi's review feedback
naveen-seth e755d18
For review only: additional `TryConsumeToken(tok::eod)`
naveen-seth 0bc7245
Update Parser and Preprocessor to handle the added tok::eod
naveen-seth File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is this check removed?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
From P1857R3:
While this paper addresses C++, I've consulted with @Bigcheese on whether Objective-C modules should follow the same rules.
In the same spirit, a line-splice was added to this test:
llvm-project/clang/unittests/Lex/DependencyDirectivesScannerTest.cpp
Lines 645 to 647 in 586b438
This patch currently fails CI due to some
clang-scan-deps
test failures caused by these changes. I'll fix those issues now. Apologies for missing this earlier.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you keep the check but update what the result of the scanner for this input should be?