[hwasan] Add hwasan-all-globals option #149621
Conversation
|
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project! This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified. If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this page. If this is not working for you, it is probably because you do not have write permissions for the repository. In which case you can instead tag reviewers by name in a comment by using If you have received no comments on your PR for a week, you can request a review by "ping"ing the PR by adding a comment “Ping”. The common courtesy "ping" rate is once a week. Please remember that you are asking for valuable time from other developers. If you have further questions, they may be answered by the LLVM GitHub User Guide. You can also ask questions in a comment on this PR, on the LLVM Discord or on the forums. |
|
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms @llvm/pr-subscribers-compiler-rt-sanitizer Author: None (shuffle2) Changeshwasan-globals does not instrument globals with custom sections, because existing code may use Introduce new hwasan-all-globals option, which instruments all user-defined globals (but not those globals which are generated by the hwasan instrumentation itself), including those with custom sections. fixes #142442 Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149621.diff 1 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/HWAddressSanitizer.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/HWAddressSanitizer.cpp
index 2c34bf2157cdd..33c2860152214 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/HWAddressSanitizer.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/HWAddressSanitizer.cpp
@@ -160,6 +160,11 @@ static cl::opt<bool> ClGenerateTagsWithCalls(
static cl::opt<bool> ClGlobals("hwasan-globals", cl::desc("Instrument globals"),
cl::Hidden, cl::init(false));
+static cl::opt<bool> ClAllGlobals(
+ "hwasan-all-globals",
+ cl::desc("Instrument globals, even those within user-defined sections"),
+ cl::Hidden, cl::init(false));
+
static cl::opt<int> ClMatchAllTag(
"hwasan-match-all-tag",
cl::desc("don't report bad accesses via pointers with this tag"),
@@ -452,6 +457,7 @@ class HWAddressSanitizer {
bool InstrumentWithCalls;
bool InstrumentStack;
bool InstrumentGlobals;
+ bool InstrumentAllGlobals;
bool DetectUseAfterScope;
bool UsePageAliases;
bool UseMatchAllCallback;
@@ -679,6 +685,7 @@ void HWAddressSanitizer::initializeModule() {
InstrumentGlobals =
!CompileKernel && !UsePageAliases && optOr(ClGlobals, NewRuntime);
+ InstrumentAllGlobals = InstrumentGlobals && ClAllGlobals;
if (!CompileKernel) {
createHwasanCtorComdat();
@@ -1780,11 +1787,21 @@ void HWAddressSanitizer::instrumentGlobals() {
if (GV.hasCommonLinkage())
continue;
- // Globals with custom sections may be used in __start_/__stop_ enumeration,
- // which would be broken both by adding tags and potentially by the extra
- // padding/alignment that we insert.
- if (GV.hasSection())
- continue;
+ if (InstrumentAllGlobals) {
+ // Avoid adding metadata emitted for the hwasan instrumentation itself.
+ // Code which makes assumptions about memory layout of globals between
+ // __start_<section>/__end_<section> linker-generated symbols may need
+ // manual adaptation.
+ auto section = GV.getSection();
+ if (section == "hwasan_globals" || section == ".note.hwasan.globals")
+ continue;
+ } else {
+ // Globals with custom sections may be used in __start_/__stop_
+ // enumeration, which would be broken both by adding tags and potentially
+ // by the extra padding/alignment that we insert.
+ if (GV.hasSection())
+ continue;
+ }
Globals.push_back(&GV);
}
|
|
What do you need this for? This seems like a very easy to misuse flag. From AsmPrinter.cpp: |
|
Please remove @pcc from the commit message. Otherwise, in case this gets merged, he will be notified whenever this gets merged into some fork, see also: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/forbidding-username-in-commits/86997 |
|
If you only need this for specific sections, maybe we should add a flag to enumerate the specific allowed sections? |
|
The intent of this change is to allow hwasan globals instrumentation to be effective on embedded targets which tend to extensively use custom sections to have fine grained control of data allocation, and mainly/exclusively use global storage instead of dynamically allocated memory. I don't think listing all sections you want to instrument would be a good solution. A normal user would then need to duplicate all expected section names in some build scripts. Also, some large codebases which this is intended for auto-create section names in ways which would be annoying to manually upkeep in related build scripts (e.g. generated based on |
sure, do you intend me to pick those changes into this PR? |
I'll submit it as soon as CI passes. You can base your test changes (an extra RUN line with your flag) on that. |
Here's what I came up with based on those changes, does it look OK? --- a/llvm/test/Instrumentation/HWAddressSanitizer/globals.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Instrumentation/HWAddressSanitizer/globals.ll
@@ -1,10 +1,12 @@
; RUN: opt < %s -S -passes=hwasan -mtriple=aarch64--linux-android29 | FileCheck --check-prefixes=CHECK,CHECK29 %s
; RUN: opt < %s -S -passes=hwasan -mtriple=aarch64--linux-android30 | FileCheck --check-prefixes=CHECK,CHECK30 %s
+; RUN: opt < %s -S -passes=hwasan -mtriple=riscv64-unknown-elf -hwasan-globals=1 -hwasan-all-globals=1 | FileCheck --check-prefixes=CHECKALLGLOBALS %s
; CHECK29: @four = global
; CHECK: @specialcaselisted = global i16 2, no_sanitize_hwaddress
-
+; CHECK: @insection = global i16 2, section "custom"
+; CHECKALLGLOBALS: @insection.hwasan = private global { i16, [14 x i8] } { i16 2, [14 x i8] c"\00\00\00\00\00\00\00\00\00\00\00\00\00\AF" }, section "custom", align 16
; CHECK: @__start_hwasan_globals = external hidden constant [0 x i8]
; CHECK: @__stop_hwasan_globals = external hidden constant [0 x i8]
@@ -37,3 +39,4 @@ source_filename = "foo"
@sixteen = global [16 x i8] zeroinitializer
@huge = global [16777232 x i8] zeroinitializer
@specialcaselisted = global i16 2, no_sanitize_hwaddress
+@insection = global i16 2, section "custom" |
|
You also want to check |
|
Thanks for your patch! I will wait to see if @pcc has any thoughts, and if not, go ahead and merge this later this week. |
|
CI failed: |
hwasan-globals does not instrument globals with custom sections, because existing code may use __start_/__stop_ symbols to iterate over globals in such a way which will cause hwasan assertions. Introduce new hwasan-all-globals option, which instruments all user-defined globals (but not those globals which are generated by the hwasan instrumentation itself), including those with custom sections.
hwasan-globals does not instrument globals with custom sections, because existing code may use
__start_/__stop_symbols to iterate over globals in such a way which will cause hwasan assertions.Introduce new hwasan-all-globals option, which instruments all user-defined globals (but not those globals which are generated by the hwasan instrumentation itself), including those with custom sections.
fixes #142442