Skip to content

Conversation

@MBaesken
Copy link
Member

@MBaesken MBaesken commented Dec 10, 2025

test\jdk\java\foreign\sharedclosejvmti\libSharedCloseAgent.cpp fails with VS2019 and some versions of VS2022 compilers as follows

========================8<------------------------
* For target support_test_jdk_jtreg_native_support_libSharedCloseAgent_libSharedCloseAgent.obj:
libSharedCloseAgent.cpp
z:\BuildAgent\work\23f345c5c4b56004\test\jdk\java\foreign\sharedclosejvmti\libSharedCloseAgent.cpp(105): fatal error C1001: Internal compiler error.
(compiler file 'msc1.cpp', line 1603)

Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8371871: libSharedCloseAgent.cpp crashes VS2019 and older VS2022 compiler (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28739/head:pull/28739
$ git checkout pull/28739

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/28739
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28739/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 28739

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 28739

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28739.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 10, 2025

👋 Welcome back mbaesken! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 10, 2025

@MBaesken This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8371871: libSharedCloseAgent.cpp crashes VS2019 and older VS2022 compiler

Reviewed-by: jvernee, mdoerr

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 3 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 655e9cd: 8373335: Serial: Clean up SerialHeap members by access specifies
  • b58e3b6: 8373227: Test java/net/httpclient/http2/StreamFlowControlTest.java failed: should sleep time be raised?
  • 8eaeb69: 8372589: VM crashes on init when NonNMethodCodeHeapSize is set too small and UseTransparentHugePages is enabled

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title JDK-8371871: libSharedCloseAgent.cpp crashes VS2019 and older VS2022 compiler 8371871: libSharedCloseAgent.cpp crashes VS2019 and older VS2022 compiler Dec 10, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 10, 2025

@MBaesken The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Dec 10, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 10, 2025

Webrevs

Comment on lines +105 to +106
jvmtiCapabilities capabilities;
memset(&capabilities, 0, sizeof(jvmtiCapabilities));
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I used {} to zero initialize all the fields of this struct. I see other use cases are also using memset to zero out the struct.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Dec 10, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@TheRealMDoerr TheRealMDoerr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@MBaesken
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for the reviews !

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 11, 2025

Going to push as commit b46aef8.
Since your change was applied there have been 9 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Dec 11, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Dec 11, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Dec 11, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 11, 2025

@MBaesken Pushed as commit b46aef8.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

core-libs [email protected] integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants