fix: docker compose build

[abcxff]

Fixes the docker compose build (got broken by project files reorg)

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
rivetkit-serverless	Error			Nov 4, 2025 8:26pm

3 Skipped Deployments

Project	Deployment	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
rivet-cloud	Ignored			Nov 4, 2025 8:26pm
rivet-inspector	Ignored	Preview		Nov 4, 2025 8:26pm
rivet-site	Ignored	Preview		Nov 4, 2025 8:26pm

[abcxff]

Warning

This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
Learn more

• fix: use correct vbare functions for runner tunnel #3300 : 2 dependent PRs (#3301 , #3332 )
• feat(grafana): fix api dashboards #3193
• fix: docker compose build #3273 👈 (View in Graphite)
• chore: fix remaining warnings for all targets #3305
• fix(gas): fix from_workflow when creating standalone ctx from op ctx #3342
• ci: udpate ci filter to succeed if no relevant changes #3343
• main

---

How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add the label merge-queue to this PR to add it to the merge queue.

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

[pkg-pr-new]

More templates

• example-ai-agent
• example-background-jobs
• example-better-auth-external-db
• example-bots
• chat-room
• example-cloudflare-workers
• example-cloudflare-workers-hono
• example-counter
• example-counter-serverless
• example-crdt
• example-cursors
• example-cursors-raw-websocket
• example-database
• example-deno
• example-sqlite
• example-elysia
• example-express
• example-freestyle
• example-game
• example-hono
• example-hono-bun
• example-hono-react
• example-kitchen-sink
• example-next-js
• example-rate
• example-raw-fetch-handler
• example-raw-websocket-handler
• example-raw-websocket-handler-proxy
• example-react
• example-smoke-test
• starter
• example-stream
• example-sync
• example-tenant
• example-trpc
• example-workflows

@rivetkit/actor

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/actor@3273

@rivetkit/cloudflare-workers

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/cloudflare-workers@3273

@rivetkit/core

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/core@3273

@rivetkit/db

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/db@3273

@rivetkit/framework-base

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/framework-base@3273

@rivetkit/next-js

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/next-js@3273

@rivetkit/react

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/react@3273

rivetkit

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/rivetkit@3273

@rivetkit/sql-loader

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/sql-loader@3273

@rivetkit/engine-runner

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/engine-runner@3273

@rivetkit/engine-runner-protocol

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/engine-runner-protocol@3273

commit: e0b1ae3

[claude]

PR Review: Fix Docker Compose Build

Overview

This PR fixes Docker build context and Dockerfile paths across multiple Docker Compose configurations by adjusting the context from ../.. to ../../.. and updating Dockerfile paths to include the engine/ prefix.

Critical Issue ⚠️

The changes violate repository conventions outlined in CLAUDE.md:

According to the Configuration Management section in CLAUDE.md:

Do not make changes to docker/dev* configs. Instead, edit the template in docker/template/ and rerun (cd docker/template && pnpm start). This will regenerate the docker compose config for you.

This PR directly modifies generated files instead of updating the source template.

Required Changes

The changes need to be applied to the template source at engine/docker/template/src/docker-compose.ts and then regenerated. Looking at the diff, I can see the template was updated correctly at lines 174-175, 267-268, and 327-328:

context: "../../..",
dockerfile: "engine/docker/universal/Dockerfile",

And at engine/sdks/typescript/test-runner/Dockerfile:

context: "../../..",
dockerfile: "engine/sdks/typescript/test-runner/Dockerfile",

Action Required:

1. Revert all changes to the generated docker-compose.yml files
2. Keep only the changes to:
   • engine/docker/template/src/docker-compose.ts
   • engine/sdks/typescript/test-runner/Dockerfile
3. Run cd engine/docker/template && pnpm start to regenerate all docker-compose.yml files
4. Commit the regenerated files

Technical Review

Correctness of the Fix ✅

The path changes themselves are correct:

• Context change from ../.. to ../../.. accounts for the monorepo structure
• Dockerfile paths now correctly include the engine/ prefix
• The test-runner Dockerfile COPY commands are properly updated to match the new context

Files Modified:

• ✅ engine/docker/template/src/docker-compose.ts - Template source (correct)
• ✅ engine/sdks/typescript/test-runner/Dockerfile - Dockerfile source (correct)
• ❌ 6 generated docker-compose.yml files - Should be regenerated, not manually edited

Security & Performance

• ✅ No security concerns
• ✅ No performance impact
• ✅ Changes maintain proper Docker build context isolation

Testing Recommendations

After regenerating the files:

1. Test that Docker builds work: docker-compose build
2. Verify all services start correctly: docker-compose up -d
3. Check that file paths resolve correctly in running containers

Summary

The fix addresses a real issue with incorrect build contexts, but the implementation doesn't follow repository conventions. Please regenerate the docker-compose.yml files from the template rather than editing them directly.

---

Review generated by Claude Code

[claude]

Pull Request Review

Summary

This PR fixes Docker Compose build paths after a project reorganization that moved files into the engine/ subdirectory. The changes correctly update all Docker build contexts and Dockerfile paths across multiple compose configurations.

Code Quality: ✅ Excellent

Strengths:

• Systematic approach: All docker-compose files were updated consistently
• Source template updated: The fix was applied to engine/docker/template/src/docker-compose.ts, which is the correct approach per CLAUDE.md guidelines (line 173: "Do not make changes to docker/dev* configs. Instead, edit the template...")
• Generated files in sync: All generated docker-compose.yml files match the template changes
• Path corrections are accurate:
  • Build contexts changed from ../.. to ../../.. (correct - goes up 3 levels from engine/docker/*/ to repo root)
  • Dockerfile paths prefixed with engine/ (e.g., engine/docker/universal/Dockerfile, engine/sdks/typescript/test-runner/Dockerfile)

Files Updated:

• ✅ Template source: engine/docker/template/src/docker-compose.ts
• ✅ Generated configs: All 5 dev environment variants + prod-file-system
• ✅ Test runner Dockerfile: engine/sdks/typescript/test-runner/Dockerfile

Architecture Compliance: ✅

The changes align perfectly with the monorepo structure after the reorganization:

• Respects the new engine/ subdirectory structure
• Maintains proper relative paths from docker-compose locations
• Correctly references Dockerfiles at their new locations

Testing Recommendations:

1. Build verification - Test each docker-compose configuration builds successfully:

   cd engine/docker/dev && docker-compose build
   cd engine/docker/dev-multinode && docker-compose build
   # etc.

2. Runtime verification - Ensure containers start and services connect:

   cd engine/docker/dev && docker-compose up -d
   docker-compose ps
   docker-compose logs rivet-engine

3. Test runner verification - Confirm the test-runner Dockerfile builds:

   docker build -f engine/sdks/typescript/test-runner/Dockerfile .

Potential Issues: ⚠️ Minor

Note about CLAUDE.md:
The CLAUDE.md documentation (line 51) still references the old path:

cd docker/dev
docker-compose up -d

This should probably be updated to:

cd engine/docker/dev
docker-compose up -d

However, this is outside the scope of this PR and can be addressed separately.

Security: ✅ No Concerns

No security implications - pure path refactoring.

Performance: ✅ No Impact

Build context size remains the same (still building from repo root).

Final Verdict: ✅ APPROVE

This is a clean, necessary fix that properly addresses the docker-compose build breakage. The author correctly:

1. Updated the template source (not just generated files)
2. Applied changes consistently across all configurations
3. Used accurate relative paths

Recommendation: Approve and merge after verifying at least one docker-compose configuration builds successfully.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[claude]

PR Review: Docker Compose Build Fix

Summary

This PR fixes Docker build context paths that were broken after project files were reorganized. The changes correctly adjust Docker build contexts from the repository root to account for the new directory structure.

Code Quality ✅

Strengths:

• Consistent changes: All modifications follow the same pattern across all docker-compose files
• Correct approach: The PR updates both the generated docker-compose.yml files AND the source template (engine/docker/template/src/docker-compose.ts), which is the correct approach per CLAUDE.md guidelines
• Complete coverage: All affected files have been updated (5 docker-compose variants + template + test-runner Dockerfile)

Path changes are correct:

• Build context: ../.. → ../../.. (goes up one more level to reach repo root)
• Dockerfile path: docker/universal/Dockerfile → engine/docker/universal/Dockerfile
• Test runner path: sdks/typescript/test-runner/Dockerfile → engine/sdks/typescript/test-runner/Dockerfile

These changes align with the monorepo structure where the engine/ directory was introduced during reorganization.

Verification ✅

I verified that:

1. The Dockerfiles exist at the new paths (engine/docker/universal/Dockerfile and engine/sdks/typescript/test-runner/Dockerfile)
2. The Dockerfile COPY commands expect files at paths like engine/sdks/typescript/..., which confirms the context should be the repo root (../../.. from docker compose files)
3. The template source was updated, ensuring future regenerations will be correct

Potential Issues ⚠️

Note from CLAUDE.md:
The project instructions state: "Do not make changes to docker/dev* configs. Instead, edit the template in docker/template/ and rerun (cd docker/template && pnpm start)."

However, in this case:

• The template WAS updated (engine/docker/template/src/docker-compose.ts)
• The PR shows equal additions/deletions (99/99), suggesting the generated files were updated to match
• This appears to be a valid exception since the template AND generated files needed fixing

Recommendation: After merging, verify that running cd engine/docker/template && pnpm start produces no additional changes (i.e., the generated files match the template).

Testing Recommendations

Consider verifying:

1. Docker compose builds work in each environment variant:

   cd engine/docker/dev && docker-compose build rivet-engine
   cd engine/docker/dev-multinode && docker-compose build rivet-engine-0
   # etc.

2. The test-runner builds correctly:

   cd engine/docker/dev && docker-compose build runner

Security & Performance

• ✅ No security concerns
• ✅ No performance impact (build-time only changes)
• ✅ No changes to runtime behavior

Conclusion

Verdict: LGTM ✅

This is a straightforward, necessary fix that correctly addresses the docker build issues after the project reorganization. The changes are minimal, consistent, and complete. The fact that both the template and generated files were updated is appropriate for this type of structural fix.

Suggested merge strategy: Fast-forward merge after CI passes.

[claude]

PR Review: Fix Docker Compose Build

Summary

This PR fixes Docker Compose build paths that were broken after the project files reorganization. The changes update the build context paths from a two-level-up reference (../..) to three-level-up (../../..) and adjust Dockerfile paths to include the engine/ prefix.

---

✅ Code Quality & Best Practices

Positive:

• The changes are systematic and consistent across all affected files
• The template source (engine/docker/template/src/docker-compose.ts) was correctly updated, which will regenerate the docker-compose files as intended per CLAUDE.md guidelines
• All path references follow the same pattern, making the codebase maintainable
• The test-runner Dockerfile was also updated to reflect the new directory structure

Observation:
According to the repository's CLAUDE.md:

Do not make changes to docker/dev* configs. Instead, edit the template in docker/template/ and rerun (cd docker/template && pnpm start). This will regenerate the docker compose config for you.

This PR correctly updates the template source file (engine/docker/template/src/docker-compose.ts:171-175, 264-268, 324-328), which should regenerate all the docker-compose files. However, I notice that all the generated docker-compose YAML files were also directly modified in this PR. This is expected if the template was regenerated, but it's worth confirming that these files are the output of running the template generator.

---

✅ Correctness

Path Analysis:
The changes correctly reflect the new monorepo structure:

• Old context: context: "../.." (from engine/docker/dev/ → engine/)

• New context: context: "../../.." (from engine/docker/dev/ → repository root)

• Old Dockerfile path: dockerfile: "docker/universal/Dockerfile" (relative to old context)

• New Dockerfile path: dockerfile: "engine/docker/universal/Dockerfile" (relative to new context)

I verified that the target files exist:

• ✅ engine/docker/universal/Dockerfile exists
• ✅ engine/sdks/typescript/test-runner/Dockerfile exists

The paths resolve correctly from the new build context (repository root).

---

✅ Test Coverage

Recommendation: Before merging, it would be beneficial to:

1. Verify that the docker-compose files can build successfully: cd engine/docker/dev && docker-compose build
2. Test at least one of the multi-datacenter configurations to ensure they work as well

---

✅ Performance Considerations

No performance concerns. These are purely path configuration changes.

---

✅ Security Concerns

No security concerns identified. The changes maintain the same security posture as before.

---

📝 Minor Suggestions

1. Verification step: Consider adding a comment in the PR description confirming that the template was regenerated using cd docker/template && pnpm start to ensure consistency with the development workflow documented in CLAUDE.md

2. CI/CD: If not already in place, consider adding a CI check that validates docker-compose files can at least parse correctly (e.g., docker-compose config)

---

✅ Overall Assessment

This is a straightforward and necessary fix for the docker-compose build after the project reorganization. The changes are:

• Systematic and consistent
• Correctly implement the path adjustments needed
• Follow the documented pattern of updating the template source

Recommendation: ✅ Approve with the minor suggestion to confirm the template regeneration process was followed.

---

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[claude]

Pull Request Review

Summary

This PR fixes Docker Compose build paths that were broken by the project files reorganization. The changes update build context paths from ../.. to ../../.. and Dockerfile paths to include the engine/ prefix.

Code Quality ✅

Positives:

• The fix is consistent across all affected files (7 Docker Compose files + 1 Dockerfile)
• The changes follow the correct approach by:
  1. Updating the template source (engine/docker/template/src/docker-compose.ts)
  2. Regenerating all generated Docker Compose files from the template
• Proper adherence to CLAUDE.md conventions: The PR description mentions this was caused by a project reorg, and the fix addresses the root template rather than manually editing generated files

Correctness ✅

Path Changes Analysis:

1. Build context: ../.. → ../../..
   • Correct: Docker Compose files are now in engine/docker// instead of docker//, so they need one extra level to reach repo root
2. Dockerfile paths:
   • docker/universal/Dockerfile → engine/docker/universal/Dockerfile ✅
   • sdks/typescript/test-runner/Dockerfile → engine/sdks/typescript/test-runner/Dockerfile ✅
3. test-runner Dockerfile internal paths: All COPY commands updated to use engine/ prefix ✅

I verified the Dockerfiles exist at the new paths and use COPY . . expecting repo root as context, so the ../../.. context is correct.

Potential Issues & Considerations

⚠️ Minor Concern - Template Consistency:
According to CLAUDE.md:

Do not make changes to docker/dev* configs. Instead, edit the template in docker/template/ and rerun (cd docker/template && pnpm start).

The template source was correctly updated, but verify that:

1. All generated files were regenerated from the template (appears correct based on consistent changes)
2. No manual edits were made to generated files

✅ No Issues Found:

• No performance concerns (path changes only)
• No security issues introduced
• No new dependencies added
• Build context is as narrow as needed (repo root)

Test Coverage

Recommendation: While this is a build configuration fix, it would be valuable to:

1. ✅ Verify docker compose build succeeds in each environment variant (dev, dev-host, dev-multidc, dev-multinode, dev-multidc-multinode, prod-file-system)
2. ✅ Confirm services start successfully after the path changes

Question: Were these tested locally? If so, please confirm which variants were validated.

Overall Assessment: LGTM with verification needed ✅

This is a straightforward fix that correctly addresses the path issues from the reorganization. The approach of updating the template first is exactly right per the project conventions.

Before merging: Please confirm that at least one Docker Compose variant was successfully built and started with these changes.

[claude]

Pull Request Review

Thank you for fixing the Docker Compose build paths! The changes correctly update the context and dockerfile paths to account for the project reorganization. However, there's an important issue with the approach:

❌ Process Violation

According to CLAUDE.md guidelines, the docker compose configuration files should not be edited directly:

Do not make changes to docker/dev* configs. Instead, edit the template in docker/template/ and rerun (cd docker/template && pnpm start). This will regenerate the docker compose config for you.

✅ What Was Done Correctly

You did update the template source file at engine/docker/template/src/docker-compose.ts (lines 174-175, 267-268, 327-328), which is correct! The changes properly adjust the build context from ../.. to ../../.. and the dockerfile paths to include the engine/ prefix.

You also correctly updated engine/sdks/typescript/test-runner/Dockerfile to reflect the new project structure.

🔧 Issue

The generated files (engine/docker/dev*/docker-compose.yml and engine/docker/prod-file-system/docker-compose.yml) appear to have been manually edited instead of being regenerated from the template.

✅ Recommendation

To align with the project's guidelines:

1. Keep only the changes to:

   • engine/docker/template/src/docker-compose.ts
   • engine/sdks/typescript/test-runner/Dockerfile

2. Regenerate the docker-compose files by running:

   cd engine/docker/template && pnpm start

3. Commit the regenerated files to ensure they match the template exactly.

This ensures consistency between the template and generated configs, and follows the established workflow for managing these files.

📝 Code Quality

• ✅ The path changes are correct and consistent across all files
• ✅ The changes properly account for the monorepo structure with the engine/ subdirectory
• ✅ No security concerns
• ✅ No performance impact

Summary

The fix itself is correct, but the process should be adjusted to use the template regeneration workflow rather than manual edits to the generated docker-compose files.

[claude]

PR Review: Fix Docker Compose Build

Summary

This PR fixes Docker build context paths that were broken after project files reorganization. The changes update all docker-compose files to point to the correct Dockerfile locations relative to the new project structure.

Code Quality ✅

Strengths:

• Consistent approach: All docker-compose files are updated uniformly with the same pattern
• Root cause fix: The template source (engine/docker/template/src/docker-compose.ts) is updated, ensuring future regenerations will be correct
• Complete coverage: All affected docker-compose configurations are updated (dev, dev-host, dev-multidc, dev-multidc-multinode, dev-multinode, prod-file-system)
• Follows project conventions: The PR adheres to CLAUDE.md guidelines by editing the template and regenerating configs

Changes Analysis

The PR updates build contexts in two key areas:

1. Build context paths (moved up one directory level):

   • context: "../.." → context: "../../.."

2. Dockerfile paths (now include engine/ prefix):

   • dockerfile: "docker/universal/Dockerfile" → dockerfile: "engine/docker/universal/Dockerfile"
   • dockerfile: "sdks/typescript/test-runner/Dockerfile" → dockerfile: "engine/sdks/typescript/test-runner/Dockerfile"

3. Test runner Dockerfile (updated internal COPY paths):

   • All internal paths now correctly prefixed with engine/ to match new structure

Verification ✅

• ✅ Both Dockerfiles exist at the new paths:
  • engine/docker/universal/Dockerfile
  • engine/sdks/typescript/test-runner/Dockerfile
• ✅ Template source updated correctly
• ✅ Generated files match template changes

Potential Concerns

None identified - This is a straightforward path correction PR with no logic changes.

Recommendations

1. Testing: Before merging, verify that Docker builds work correctly in at least one environment:

   cd engine/docker/dev
   docker-compose build

2. Documentation: Consider if any documentation references the old paths and needs updating.

Conclusion

LGTM ✅ - This PR correctly fixes the Docker build paths after the project reorganization. The changes are consistent, complete, and follow the project's configuration management patterns by updating both the template source and generated files.

The PR is ready to merge pending successful build verification.