-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 129
fix(rivetkit): explicitly handle errors in _onStop #3325
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(rivetkit): explicitly handle errors in _onStop #3325
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
3 Skipped Deployments
|
Code Review: PR #3325 - Explicitly handle errors in _onStopSummaryThis PR adds error handling around the Positive Aspects✅ Critical bug fix: This addresses a real issue where errors thrown during ✅ Consistent with patterns in the codebase: The error handling approach using try-catch with ✅ Good defensive programming: The error message clearly indicates the error is being logged but the cleanup will proceed, which is the correct behavior for a cleanup handler. ✅ Matches the ActorInstance implementation: Looking at Suggestions for Improvement1. Consider logging the actorId for better debuggingThe error log should include the logger().error({
msg: "error in _onStop, proceeding with removing actor",
actorId, // Add this for context
err: stringifyError(err),
});2. Alignment with instance.ts patternsIn 3. Minor: Variable naming consistencyThe catch block uses Testing Considerations
Security & Performance✅ No security concerns identified ConclusionThis is a solid bug fix that prevents errors in user-defined cleanup handlers from breaking the actor lifecycle management. The implementation is clean and follows existing patterns. Recommendation: Approve with the minor suggestion to add Code Quality: ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (4/5) |
c919694 to
2d6a1e2
Compare
0bb481c to
158182f
Compare
Pull Request ReviewSummaryThis PR adds error handling to the Code Quality ✅Strengths:
Style Compliance:
Potential Issues & Considerations1. Error Logging Field Name this.#rLog.error({
msg: "error in onStop",
error: stringifyError(error),
});Recommendation: Consider changing to 2. Actor State Inconsistency Risk 🤔
While this PR correctly proceeds with cleanup, there's a risk that resources associated with the actor aren't properly released. However, this is likely acceptable given the alternative is worse (actor never gets cleaned up). 3. Missing Test Coverage
Performance Considerations ✅No performance concerns. The try-catch adds negligible overhead and only executes during actor shutdown. Security Considerations ✅No security issues identified. The use of Architecture & Design 👍Positive:
Question: RecommendationsHigh Priority:
Medium Priority: Low Priority: Verdict: ✅ Approve with Minor SuggestionsThis is a solid defensive programming fix that improves system reliability. The core change is correct and valuable. The suggestions above are primarily about consistency, observability, and test coverage rather than correctness issues. The change prevents a failure scenario where actors could get stuck in the driver if their cleanup logic throws, which could lead to memory leaks or other issues. Well done on identifying and fixing this edge case! |
PR Review: fix(rivetkit): explicitly handle errors in _onStopSummaryThis PR adds error handling around the Code Quality & Best Practices ✅Strengths:
Consistency with Codebase:
Potential Issues & Recommendations1. Inconsistent Error Handling Across Drivers
|
2d6a1e2 to
91b3d4f
Compare
158182f to
0f23c20
Compare
|
Deployment failed with the following error: Learn More: https://vercel.com/docs/limits#rate-limits |
Code Review - PR #3325SummaryThis PR adds error handling to the Positive Aspects ✅
Architecture Considerations 🏗️Lifecycle Flow Context:
Why This Fix Is Important: Suggestions for Consideration 💭1. Error ContextConsider adding the logger().error({
msg: "error in _onStop, proceeding with removing actor",
actorId,
err: stringifyError(err),
});2. Test CoverageNo test files currently cover
3. Metrics/ObservabilityConsider adding a metric or counter for Code Quality ✅
Security & Performance 🔒⚡
Verdict ✅LGTM with minor suggestions. This is a solid defensive programming fix that prevents potential memory leaks and ensures proper cleanup. The implementation is consistent with existing error handling patterns in the codebase. The suggestions above are optional improvements and should not block merging this PR. Review generated with attention to the repository's CLAUDE.md conventions |
0f23c20 to
becb4b8
Compare
Code Review: PR #3325 - Explicitly Handle Errors in _onStopSummaryThis PR adds defensive error handling around the ✅ Positive Aspects
🔧 Recommendations for Improvement1. Add
|
Merge activity
|
becb4b8 to
96c8a07
Compare
PR Review: fix(rivetkit): explicitly handle errors in _onStopSummaryThis PR adds defensive error handling around the Analysis✅ Strengths
🔍 Observations \u0026 Suggestions1. Minor: Include actorId in error log for debugging Current code logs the error but not which actor failed: logger().error({
msg: "error in _onStop, proceeding with removing actor",
err: stringifyError(err),
});Consider adding logger().error({
msg: "error in _onStop, proceeding with removing actor",
actorId,
err: stringifyError(err),
});2. Field naming: The code uses this.#rLog.error({
msg: "error in onStop",
error: stringifyError(error),
});Minor inconsistency - either is acceptable, but consider standardizing for easier log querying. 3. Similar pattern missing in file-system driver The file-system driver at await actor.actor._onStop();Consider applying the same defensive pattern there in a follow-up PR for consistency. 4. Test coverage gap No tests found for the scenario where
🔒 Security \u0026 Performance
Verdict: ✅ APPROVEThis is a well-implemented fix for a real reliability issue. The core change is correct and follows codebase conventions. The suggestions above are minor improvements for observability and consistency, not blockers. Recommendation: Merge as-is, optionally address the Impact: High (prevents memory leaks and cleanup failures) |

No description provided.