Skip to content

Conversation

NathanFlurry
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 25, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
rivetkit-serverless Error Error Sep 26, 2025 0:14am

Copy link

claude bot commented Sep 25, 2025

Claude finished @NathanFlurry's task —— View job


PR Review: Chat Example Updates

Todo List:

  • Review repository guidelines and conventions
  • Analyze package.json changes
  • Review README updates
  • Examine source code changes
  • Check deleted files and their impact
  • Review configuration changes
  • Assess overall code quality and best practices
  • Provide final recommendations

Review Summary

✅ Positive Changes

  • README structure: Follows the required template format perfectly with proper headings and links
  • Dependency organization: Moving React/Vite deps to devDependencies is correct since they're build-time deps
  • Port consistency: Backend and frontend consistently use port 6420 for RivetKit server
  • CORS configuration: Proper CORS setup in server.ts with credentials support
  • Test coverage: Comprehensive test suite exists covering core functionality
  • Turbo configuration: Correct turbo.json setup per guidelines

⚠️ Issues to Address

1. Critical Runtime Error 🔴

// packages/cloudflare-workers/src/actor-handler-do.ts:195-200
function configureInspectorAccessToken(config: any, managerDriver: ManagerDriver,) {
  throw new Error("Function not implemented.");
}

This function is called during actor initialization (line 127) and will cause runtime failures. This needs to be implemented or the call removed.

2. Package Naming Convention ⚠️

// examples/chat-room/package.json:2
"name": "chat-room"

Per CLAUDE.md guidelines, should be "example-chat-room" for examples.

3. Port Documentation Mismatch ⚠️

// README.md:32
Open your browser to `http://localhost:3000`

Should be http://localhost:5173 to match vite.config.ts port setting.

4. Missing Educational Value 📚

The deleted connect.ts script was valuable for learning:

  • Basic RivetKit client connection patterns
  • Simple API usage examples
  • Event handling demonstrations

Consider adding a simpler connection example back or expanding the README with basic usage examples.

🔒 Security & Performance

  • Security: CORS properly configured, no sensitive data exposure
  • Performance: Efficient React patterns, proper cleanup in CLI script
  • Code Quality: Follows TypeScript best practices, good error handling

🧪 Test Coverage

Excellent test coverage with comprehensive scenarios:

  • Message sending and history retrieval
  • Sequential timestamp validation
  • Multi-user support
  • Edge cases (empty messages)

Recommendations

High Priority:

  1. Fix the configureInspectorAccessToken runtime error
  2. Correct the README port documentation
  3. Update package name to follow conventions

Medium Priority:
4. Consider re-adding a simple connection example for educational purposes
5. Add installation command example using pnpm instead of npm to match project conventions

Overall Assessment: Good modernization of the chat example with proper structure and comprehensive testing. The main concerns are the runtime error and minor documentation inconsistencies.


Copy link
Member Author

NathanFlurry commented Sep 25, 2025

Warning

This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
Learn more


How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:

  • merge queue - adds this PR to the back of the merge queue
  • hotfix - for urgent hot fixes, skip the queue and merge this PR next

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Sep 25, 2025

More templates

@rivetkit/actor

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivetkit/@rivetkit/actor@1301

@rivetkit/cloudflare-workers

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivetkit/@rivetkit/cloudflare-workers@1301

@rivetkit/core

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivetkit/@rivetkit/core@1301

@rivetkit/db

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivetkit/@rivetkit/db@1301

@rivetkit/framework-base

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivetkit/@rivetkit/framework-base@1301

@rivetkit/next-js

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivetkit/@rivetkit/next-js@1301

@rivetkit/react

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivetkit/@rivetkit/react@1301

rivetkit

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivetkit@1301

@rivetkit/sql-loader

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivetkit/@rivetkit/sql-loader@1301

commit: b18a5c6

@NathanFlurry NathanFlurry force-pushed the 09-25-chore_example_update_chat_example branch from fe74a9f to ac99015 Compare September 25, 2025 07:45
@NathanFlurry NathanFlurry force-pushed the 09-25-fix_core_fix_passing_incorrect_actor_input_to_create branch from e234811 to 89a9d24 Compare September 25, 2025 07:45
Copy link

claude bot commented Sep 25, 2025

Claude finished @NathanFlurry's task —— View job


PR Review: Chat Example Updates

Todo List:

  • Review repository guidelines and conventions
  • Analyze package.json changes
  • Review README updates
  • Examine source code changes
  • Check deleted files and their impact
  • Review configuration changes
  • Assess overall code quality and best practices
  • Provide final recommendations

Review Summary

✅ Positive Changes

  • README structure: Follows the required template format perfectly with proper headings and links
  • Dependency organization: Moving React/Vite deps to devDependencies is correct since they're build-time deps
  • Port consistency: Backend and frontend consistently use port 6420 for RivetKit server
  • CORS configuration: Proper CORS setup in server.ts with credentials support
  • Test coverage: Comprehensive test suite exists covering core functionality
  • Turbo configuration: Correct turbo.json setup per guidelines

⚠️ Issues to Address

1. Critical Runtime Error 🔴

// packages/cloudflare-workers/src/actor-handler-do.ts:195-200
function configureInspectorAccessToken(config: any, managerDriver: ManagerDriver,) {
  throw new Error("Function not implemented.");
}

This function is called during actor initialization (line 127) and will cause runtime failures. This needs to be implemented or the call removed.

2. Package Naming Convention ⚠️

// examples/chat-room/package.json:2
"name": "chat-room"

Per CLAUDE.md guidelines, should be "example-chat-room" for examples.

3. Port Documentation Mismatch ⚠️

// README.md:32
Open your browser to `http://localhost:3000`

Should be http://localhost:5173 to match vite.config.ts port setting.

4. Missing Educational Value 📚

The deleted connect.ts script was valuable for learning:

  • Basic RivetKit client connection patterns
  • Simple API usage examples
  • Event handling demonstrations

Consider adding a simpler connection example back or expanding the README with basic usage examples.

🔒 Security & Performance

  • Security: CORS properly configured, no sensitive data exposure
  • Performance: Efficient React patterns, proper cleanup in CLI script
  • Code Quality: Follows TypeScript best practices, good error handling

🧪 Test Coverage

Excellent test coverage with comprehensive scenarios:

  • Message sending and history retrieval
  • Sequential timestamp validation
  • Multi-user support
  • Edge cases (empty messages)

Recommendations

High Priority:

  1. Fix the configureInspectorAccessToken runtime error
  2. Correct the README port documentation
  3. Update package name to follow conventions

Medium Priority:
4. Consider re-adding a simple connection example for educational purposes
5. Add installation command example using pnpm instead of npm to match project conventions

Overall Assessment: Good modernization of the chat example with proper structure and comprehensive testing. The main concerns are the runtime error and minor documentation inconsistencies.


Copy link

claude bot commented Sep 25, 2025

Claude finished @NathanFlurry's task —— View job


PR Review: Chat Example Updates

Todo List:

  • Review repository guidelines and conventions
  • Analyze package.json changes
  • Review README updates
  • Examine source code changes
  • Check deleted files and their impact
  • Review configuration changes
  • Assess overall code quality and best practices
  • Provide final recommendations

Review Summary

✅ Positive Changes

  • README structure: Follows the required template format perfectly with proper headings and links
  • Dependency organization: Moving React/Vite deps to devDependencies is correct since they're build-time deps
  • Port consistency: Backend and frontend consistently use port 6420 for RivetKit server
  • CORS configuration: Proper CORS setup in server.ts with credentials support
  • Test coverage: Comprehensive test suite exists covering core functionality
  • Turbo configuration: Correct turbo.json setup per guidelines

⚠️ Issues to Address

1. Critical Runtime Error 🔴

// packages/cloudflare-workers/src/actor-handler-do.ts:195-200
function configureInspectorAccessToken(config: any, managerDriver: ManagerDriver,) {
  throw new Error("Function not implemented.");
}

This function is called during actor initialization (line 127) and will cause runtime failures. This needs to be implemented or the call removed.

2. Package Naming Convention ⚠️

// examples/chat-room/package.json:2
"name": "chat-room"

Per CLAUDE.md guidelines, should be "example-chat-room" for examples.

3. Port Documentation Mismatch ⚠️

// README.md:32
Open your browser to `http://localhost:3000`

Should be http://localhost:5173 to match vite.config.ts port setting.

4. Missing Educational Value 📚

The deleted connect.ts script was valuable for learning:

  • Basic RivetKit client connection patterns
  • Simple API usage examples
  • Event handling demonstrations

Consider adding a simpler connection example back or expanding the README with basic usage examples.

🔒 Security & Performance

  • Security: CORS properly configured, no sensitive data exposure
  • Performance: Efficient React patterns, proper cleanup in CLI script
  • Code Quality: Follows TypeScript best practices, good error handling

🧪 Test Coverage

Excellent test coverage with comprehensive scenarios:

  • Message sending and history retrieval
  • Sequential timestamp validation
  • Multi-user support
  • Edge cases (empty messages)

Recommendations

High Priority:

  1. Fix the configureInspectorAccessToken runtime error
  2. Correct the README port documentation
  3. Update package name to follow conventions

Medium Priority:
4. Consider re-adding a simple connection example for educational purposes
5. Add installation command example using pnpm instead of npm to match project conventions

Overall Assessment: Good modernization of the chat example with proper structure and comprehensive testing. The main concerns are the runtime error and minor documentation inconsistencies.


Copy link

claude bot commented Sep 25, 2025

Claude finished @NathanFlurry's task —— View job


PR Review: Chat Example Updates

✅ Positive Changes

  • README structure: Follows the required template format perfectly with proper headings and links
  • Dependency organization: Moving React/Vite deps to devDependencies is correct since they're build-time deps
  • Port consistency: Backend and frontend consistently use port 6420 for RivetKit server
  • CORS configuration: Proper CORS setup in server.ts with credentials support
  • Test coverage: Comprehensive test suite exists covering core functionality
  • Turbo configuration: Correct turbo.json setup per guidelines

⚠️ Issues to Address

1. Critical Runtime Error 🔴

// packages/cloudflare-workers/src/actor-handler-do.ts:194-199
function configureInspectorAccessToken(config: any, managerDriver: ManagerDriver,) {
  throw new Error("Function not implemented.");
}

This function is called during actor initialization (line 126) and will cause runtime failures. This needs to be implemented or the call removed.

2. Package Naming Convention ⚠️

// examples/chat-room/package.json:2
"name": "chat-room"

Per CLAUDE.md guidelines, should be "example-chat-room" for examples.

3. Port Documentation Mismatch ⚠️

// README.md:32
Open your browser to `http://localhost:3000`

Should be http://localhost:5173 to match vite.config.ts port setting.

4. Missing Educational Value 📚

The deleted connect.ts script was valuable for learning:

  • Basic RivetKit client connection patterns
  • Simple API usage examples
  • Event handling demonstrations

Consider adding a simpler connection example back or expanding the README with basic usage examples.

🔒 Security & Performance

  • Security: CORS properly configured, no sensitive data exposure
  • Performance: Efficient React patterns, proper cleanup in CLI script
  • Code Quality: Follows TypeScript best practices, good error handling

🧪 Test Coverage

Excellent test coverage with comprehensive scenarios:

  • Message sending and history retrieval
  • Sequential timestamp validation
  • Multi-user support
  • Edge cases (empty messages)

Recommendations

High Priority:

  1. Fix the configureInspectorAccessToken runtime error
  2. Correct the README port documentation
  3. Update package name to follow conventions

Medium Priority:
4. Consider re-adding a simple connection example for educational purposes
5. Add installation command example using pnpm instead of npm to match project conventions

Overall Assessment: Good modernization of the chat example with proper structure and comprehensive testing. The main concerns are the runtime error and minor documentation inconsistencies.


Copy link

claude bot commented Sep 25, 2025

Claude finished @NathanFlurry's task —— View job


PR Review: Chat Example Updates

Todo List:

  • Review repository guidelines and conventions
  • Analyze package.json changes
  • Review README updates
  • Examine source code changes
  • Check deleted files and their impact
  • Review configuration changes
  • Assess overall code quality and best practices
  • Provide final recommendations

Review Summary

✅ Positive Changes

  • README structure: Follows the required template format perfectly with proper headings and links
  • Dependency organization: Moving React/Vite deps to devDependencies is correct since they're build-time deps
  • Port consistency: Backend and frontend consistently use port 6420 for RivetKit server
  • CORS configuration: Proper CORS setup in server.ts with credentials support
  • Test coverage: Comprehensive test suite exists covering core functionality
  • Turbo configuration: Correct turbo.json setup per guidelines

⚠️ Issues to Address

1. Critical Runtime Error 🔴

// packages/cloudflare-workers/src/actor-handler-do.ts:195-200
function configureInspectorAccessToken(config: any, managerDriver: ManagerDriver,) {
  throw new Error("Function not implemented.");
}

This function is called during actor initialization (line 126) and will cause runtime failures. This needs to be implemented or the call removed.

2. Package Naming Convention ⚠️

// examples/chat-room/package.json:2
"name": "chat-room"

Per CLAUDE.md guidelines, should be "example-chat-room" for examples.

3. Port Documentation Mismatch ⚠️

// README.md:32
Open your browser to `http://localhost:3000`

Should be http://localhost:5173 to match vite.config.ts port setting.

4. Missing Educational Value 📚

The deleted connect.ts script was valuable for learning:

  • Basic RivetKit client connection patterns
  • Simple API usage examples
  • Event handling demonstrations

Consider adding a simpler connection example back or expanding the README with basic usage examples.

🔒 Security & Performance

  • Security: CORS properly configured, no sensitive data exposure
  • Performance: Efficient React patterns, proper cleanup in CLI script
  • Code Quality: Follows TypeScript best practices, good error handling

🧪 Test Coverage

Excellent test coverage with comprehensive scenarios:

  • Message sending and history retrieval
  • Sequential timestamp validation
  • Multi-user support
  • Edge cases (empty messages)

Recommendations

High Priority:

  1. Fix the configureInspectorAccessToken runtime error
  2. Correct the README port documentation
  3. Update package name to follow conventions

Medium Priority:
4. Consider re-adding a simple connection example for educational purposes
5. Add installation command example using pnpm instead of npm to match project conventions

Overall Assessment: Good modernization of the chat example with proper structure and comprehensive testing. The main concerns are the runtime error and minor documentation inconsistencies.


Copy link

claude bot commented Sep 25, 2025

Claude finished @NathanFlurry's task —— View job


PR Review: Chat Example Updates

Todo List:

  • Review repository guidelines and conventions
  • Analyze package.json changes
  • Review README updates
  • Examine source code changes
  • Check deleted files and their impact
  • Review configuration changes
  • Assess overall code quality and best practices
  • Provide final recommendations

Review Summary

✅ Positive Changes

  • README structure: Follows the required template format perfectly with proper headings and links
  • Dependency organization: Moving React/Vite deps to devDependencies is correct since they're build-time deps
  • Port consistency: Backend and frontend consistently use port 6420 for RivetKit server
  • CORS configuration: Proper CORS setup in server.ts with credentials support
  • Test coverage: Comprehensive test suite exists covering core functionality
  • Turbo configuration: Correct turbo.json setup per guidelines

⚠️ Issues to Address

1. Critical Runtime Error 🔴

// packages/cloudflare-workers/src/actor-handler-do.ts:194-199
function configureInspectorAccessToken(config: any, managerDriver: ManagerDriver,) {
  throw new Error("Function not implemented.");
}

This function is called during actor initialization (line 126) and will cause runtime failures. This needs to be implemented or the call removed.

2. Package Naming Convention ⚠️

// examples/chat-room/package.json:2
"name": "chat-room"

Per CLAUDE.md guidelines, should be "example-chat-room" for examples.

3. Port Documentation Mismatch ⚠️

// README.md:32
Open your browser to `http://localhost:3000`

Should be http://localhost:5173 to match vite.config.ts port setting.

4. Missing Educational Value 📚

The deleted connect.ts script was valuable for learning:

  • Basic RivetKit client connection patterns
  • Simple API usage examples
  • Event handling demonstrations

Consider adding a simpler connection example back or expanding the README with basic usage examples.

🔒 Security & Performance

  • Security: CORS properly configured, no sensitive data exposure
  • Performance: Efficient React patterns, proper cleanup in CLI script
  • Code Quality: Follows TypeScript best practices, good error handling

🧪 Test Coverage

Excellent test coverage with comprehensive scenarios:

  • Message sending and history retrieval
  • Sequential timestamp validation
  • Multi-user support
  • Edge cases (empty messages)

Recommendations

High Priority:

  1. Fix the configureInspectorAccessToken runtime error
  2. Correct the README port documentation
  3. Update package name to follow conventions

Medium Priority:
4. Consider re-adding a simple connection example for educational purposes
5. Add installation command example using pnpm instead of npm to match project conventions

Overall Assessment: Good modernization of the chat example with proper structure and comprehensive testing. The main concerns are the runtime error and minor documentation inconsistencies.


@NathanFlurry NathanFlurry force-pushed the 09-25-chore_example_update_chat_example branch from d96e775 to b18a5c6 Compare September 25, 2025 23:28
@NathanFlurry NathanFlurry force-pushed the 09-25-fix_core_fix_passing_incorrect_actor_input_to_create branch from 90d2263 to 9a11e38 Compare September 25, 2025 23:28
Copy link

claude bot commented Sep 25, 2025

Claude finished @NathanFlurry's task —— View job


PR Review: Chat Example Updates

Todo List:

  • Review repository guidelines and conventions
  • Analyze package.json changes
  • Review README updates
  • Examine source code changes
  • Check deleted files and their impact
  • Review configuration changes
  • Assess overall code quality and best practices
  • Provide final recommendations

Review Summary

✅ Positive Changes

  • README structure: Follows the required template format perfectly with proper headings and links
  • Dependency organization: Moving React/Vite deps to devDependencies is correct since they're build-time deps
  • Port consistency: Backend and frontend consistently use port 6420 for RivetKit server
  • CORS configuration: Proper CORS setup in server.ts with credentials support
  • Test coverage: Comprehensive test suite exists covering core functionality
  • Turbo configuration: Correct turbo.json setup per guidelines

⚠️ Issues to Address

1. Critical Runtime Error 🔴

// packages/cloudflare-workers/src/actor-handler-do.ts:194-199
function configureInspectorAccessToken(config: any, managerDriver: ManagerDriver,) {
  throw new Error("Function not implemented.");
}

This function is called during actor initialization (line 126) and will cause runtime failures. This needs to be implemented or the call removed.

2. Package Naming Convention ⚠️

// examples/chat-room/package.json:2
"name": "chat-room"

Per CLAUDE.md guidelines, should be "example-chat-room" for examples.

3. Port Documentation Mismatch ⚠️

// README.md:32
Open your browser to `http://localhost:3000`

Should be http://localhost:5173 to match vite.config.ts port setting.

4. Missing Educational Value 📚

The deleted connect.ts script was valuable for learning:

  • Basic RivetKit client connection patterns
  • Simple API usage examples
  • Event handling demonstrations

Consider adding a simpler connection example back or expanding the README with basic usage examples.

🔒 Security & Performance

  • Security: CORS properly configured, no sensitive data exposure
  • Performance: Efficient React patterns, proper cleanup in CLI script
  • Code Quality: Follows TypeScript best practices, good error handling

🧪 Test Coverage

Excellent test coverage with comprehensive scenarios:

  • Message sending and history retrieval
  • Sequential timestamp validation
  • Multi-user support
  • Edge cases (empty messages)

Recommendations

High Priority:

  1. Fix the configureInspectorAccessToken runtime error
  2. Correct the README port documentation
  3. Update package name to follow conventions

Medium Priority:
4. Consider re-adding a simple connection example for educational purposes
5. Add installation command example using pnpm instead of npm to match project conventions

Overall Assessment: Good modernization of the chat example with proper structure and comprehensive testing. The main concerns are the runtime error and minor documentation inconsistencies.


Copy link

claude bot commented Sep 25, 2025

Claude finished @NathanFlurry's task —— View job


PR Review: Chat Example Updates

Todo List:

  • Review repository guidelines and conventions
  • Analyze package.json changes
  • Review README updates
  • Examine source code changes
  • Check deleted files and their impact
  • Review configuration changes
  • Assess overall code quality and best practices
  • Provide final recommendations

Review Summary

✅ Positive Changes

  • README structure: Follows the required template format perfectly with proper headings and links
  • Dependency organization: Moving React/Vite deps to devDependencies is correct since they're build-time deps
  • Port consistency: Backend and frontend consistently use port 6420 for RivetKit server
  • CORS configuration: Proper CORS setup in server.ts with credentials support
  • Test coverage: Comprehensive test suite exists covering core functionality
  • Turbo configuration: Correct turbo.json setup per guidelines

⚠️ Issues to Address

1. Critical Runtime Error 🔴

// packages/cloudflare-workers/src/actor-handler-do.ts:194-199
function configureInspectorAccessToken(config: any, managerDriver: ManagerDriver,) {
  throw new Error("Function not implemented.");
}

This function is called during actor initialization (line 126) and will cause runtime failures. This needs to be implemented or the call removed.

2. Package Naming Convention ⚠️

// examples/chat-room/package.json:2
"name": "chat-room"

Per CLAUDE.md guidelines, should be "example-chat-room" for examples.

3. Port Documentation Mismatch ⚠️

// README.md:32
Open your browser to `http://localhost:3000`

Should be http://localhost:5173 to match vite.config.ts port setting.

4. Missing Educational Value 📚

The deleted connect.ts script was valuable for learning:

  • Basic RivetKit client connection patterns
  • Simple API usage examples
  • Event handling demonstrations

Consider adding a simpler connection example back or expanding the README with basic usage examples.

🔒 Security & Performance

  • Security: CORS properly configured, no sensitive data exposure
  • Performance: Efficient React patterns, proper cleanup in CLI script
  • Code Quality: Follows TypeScript best practices, good error handling

🧪 Test Coverage

Excellent test coverage with comprehensive scenarios:

  • Message sending and history retrieval
  • Sequential timestamp validation
  • Multi-user support
  • Edge cases (empty messages)

Recommendations

High Priority:

  1. Fix the configureInspectorAccessToken runtime error
  2. Correct the README port documentation
  3. Update package name to follow conventions

Medium Priority:
4. Consider re-adding a simple connection example for educational purposes
5. Add installation command example using pnpm instead of npm to match project conventions

Overall Assessment: Good modernization of the chat example with proper structure and comprehensive testing. The main concerns are the runtime error and minor documentation inconsistencies.


Copy link

graphite-app bot commented Sep 25, 2025

Merge activity

  • Sep 25, 11:36 PM UTC: NathanFlurry added this pull request to the Graphite merge queue.
  • Sep 25, 11:36 PM UTC: CI is running for this pull request on a draft pull request (#1307) due to your merge queue CI optimization settings.
  • Sep 25, 11:37 PM UTC: Merged by the Graphite merge queue via draft PR: #1307.

graphite-app bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2025
@graphite-app graphite-app bot closed this Sep 25, 2025
@graphite-app graphite-app bot deleted the 09-25-chore_example_update_chat_example branch September 25, 2025 23:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant