chore(deps): bump @actions/github from 2.2.0 to 4.0.0

[dependabot-preview]

Bumps @actions/github from 2.2.0 to 4.0.0.

Changelog

Sourced from @actions/github's changelog.

4.0.0

• Add execution state information to context
• Update Octokit Dependencies with some api breaking changes
  • The full list of api changes are here
  • GitHub.plugin() no longer supports an array as first argument. Multiple args must be passed in instead.

3.0.0

• Swap to @octokit/core and use plugins to leverage lastest octokit apis
• Add comment field to payload context

Commits

• See full diff in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

---

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

• @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
• @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
• @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
• @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
• @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
• @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot badge me will comment on this PR with code to add a "Dependabot enabled" badge to your readme

Additionally, you can set the following in the .dependabot/config.yml file in this repo:

• Update frequency
• Out-of-range updates (receive only lockfile updates, if desired)
• Security updates (receive only security updates, if desired)

[tianhaoz95]

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in 8e39014

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

• Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 31 in 8e39014

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

• Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 37 in 8e39014

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

• Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 57 to 58 in 8e39014

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

• Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 59 in 8e39014

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

• Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 60 in 8e39014

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

• Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 60 to 61 in 8e39014

	is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is
	obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

• Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 62 in 8e39014

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

• Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 70 in 8e39014

This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,

• Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

readable-readme/CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in 8e39014

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

readable-readme/README.md

Line 9 in 8e39014

Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/README.md

Line 25 in 8e39014

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

• Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 8e39014

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 8e39014

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in 8e39014

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in 8e39014

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in 8e39014

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 22 in 8e39014

It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed)

• Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in 8e39014

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

• Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 11 in 8e39014

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 13 in 8e39014

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

• Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Lines 15 to 16 in 8e39014

	excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were
	stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

• Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 17 in 8e39014

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 23 in 8e39014

Hmmm... This is really bad.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 8e39014

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 8e39014

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 8e39014

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 8e39014

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 8e39014

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in 8e39014

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in 8e39014

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 8e39014

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 8e39014

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in 8e39014

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in 8e39014

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in 8e39014

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in 8e39014

Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time.

• Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 8e39014

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 8e39014

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 8e39014

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 8e39014

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 8e39014

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 8e39014

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in 8e39014

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in 8e39014

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 8e39014

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 8e39014

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 8e39014

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 8e39014

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 8e39014

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 8e39014

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 8e39014

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 8e39014

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 8e39014

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 8e39014

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 8e39014

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 8e39014

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 8e39014

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 8e39014

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 8e39014

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 12 in 8e39014

I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 8e39014

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 8e39014

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 8e39014

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 8e39014

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 8e39014

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 8e39014

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 8e39014

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 8e39014

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 8e39014

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 8e39014

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 8e39014

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 18 in 8e39014

2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

• Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟

  • # Not Respectful TextYou suck
  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • fuckin white boys get things right next time
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 8e39014

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 8e39014

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 8e39014

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 8e39014

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 8e39014

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in 8e39014

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in 8e39014

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 8e39014

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 8e39014

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in 8e39014

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in 8e39014

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in 8e39014

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

readable-readme/src/README.md

Line 3 in 8e39014

The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration.

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

[tianhaoz95]

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in c9e7963

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

• Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 31 in c9e7963

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

• Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 37 in c9e7963

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

• Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 57 to 58 in c9e7963

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

• Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 59 in c9e7963

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

• Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 60 in c9e7963

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

• Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 60 to 61 in c9e7963

	is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is
	obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

• Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 62 in c9e7963

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

• Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 70 in c9e7963

This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,

• Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

readable-readme/CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in c9e7963

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

readable-readme/README.md

Line 9 in c9e7963

Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/README.md

Line 25 in c9e7963

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

• Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in c9e7963

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in c9e7963

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in c9e7963

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in c9e7963

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in c9e7963

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 22 in c9e7963

It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed)

• Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in c9e7963

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

• Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 11 in c9e7963

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 13 in c9e7963

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

• Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Lines 15 to 16 in c9e7963

	excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were
	stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

• Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 17 in c9e7963

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 23 in c9e7963

Hmmm... This is really bad.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in c9e7963

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in c9e7963

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in c9e7963

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in c9e7963

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in c9e7963

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in c9e7963

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in c9e7963

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in c9e7963

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in c9e7963

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in c9e7963

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in c9e7963

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in c9e7963

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in c9e7963

Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time.

• Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in c9e7963

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in c9e7963

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in c9e7963

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in c9e7963

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in c9e7963

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in c9e7963

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in c9e7963

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in c9e7963

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in c9e7963

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in c9e7963

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in c9e7963

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in c9e7963

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in c9e7963

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in c9e7963

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in c9e7963

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in c9e7963

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in c9e7963

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in c9e7963

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in c9e7963

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in c9e7963

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in c9e7963

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in c9e7963

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in c9e7963

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 12 in c9e7963

I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in c9e7963

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in c9e7963

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in c9e7963

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in c9e7963

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in c9e7963

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in c9e7963

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in c9e7963

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in c9e7963

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in c9e7963

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in c9e7963

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in c9e7963

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 18 in c9e7963

2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

• Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟

  • # Not Respectful TextYou suck
  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • fuckin white boys get things right next time
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in c9e7963

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in c9e7963

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in c9e7963

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in c9e7963

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in c9e7963

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in c9e7963

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in c9e7963

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in c9e7963

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in c9e7963

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in c9e7963

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in c9e7963

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in c9e7963

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

readable-readme/src/README.md

Line 3 in c9e7963

The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration.

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

[tianhaoz95]

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in cbfb6a8

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

• Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 31 in cbfb6a8

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

• Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 37 in cbfb6a8

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

• Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 57 to 58 in cbfb6a8

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

• Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 59 in cbfb6a8

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

• Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 60 in cbfb6a8

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

• Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 60 to 61 in cbfb6a8

	is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is
	obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

• Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 62 in cbfb6a8

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

• Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 70 in cbfb6a8

This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,

• Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

readable-readme/CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in cbfb6a8

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

readable-readme/README.md

Line 9 in cbfb6a8

Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/README.md

Line 25 in cbfb6a8

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

• Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in cbfb6a8

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in cbfb6a8

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in cbfb6a8

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in cbfb6a8

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in cbfb6a8

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 22 in cbfb6a8

It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed)

• Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in cbfb6a8

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

• Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 11 in cbfb6a8

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 13 in cbfb6a8

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

• Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Lines 15 to 16 in cbfb6a8

	excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were
	stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

• Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 17 in cbfb6a8

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 23 in cbfb6a8

Hmmm... This is really bad.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in cbfb6a8

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in cbfb6a8

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in cbfb6a8

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in cbfb6a8

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in cbfb6a8

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in cbfb6a8

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in cbfb6a8

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in cbfb6a8

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in cbfb6a8

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in cbfb6a8

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in cbfb6a8

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in cbfb6a8

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in cbfb6a8

Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time.

• Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in cbfb6a8

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in cbfb6a8

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in cbfb6a8

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in cbfb6a8

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in cbfb6a8

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in cbfb6a8

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in cbfb6a8

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in cbfb6a8

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in cbfb6a8

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in cbfb6a8

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in cbfb6a8

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in cbfb6a8

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in cbfb6a8

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in cbfb6a8

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in cbfb6a8

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in cbfb6a8

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in cbfb6a8

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in cbfb6a8

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in cbfb6a8

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in cbfb6a8

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in cbfb6a8

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in cbfb6a8

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in cbfb6a8

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 12 in cbfb6a8

I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in cbfb6a8

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in cbfb6a8

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in cbfb6a8

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in cbfb6a8

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in cbfb6a8

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in cbfb6a8

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in cbfb6a8

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in cbfb6a8

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in cbfb6a8

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in cbfb6a8

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in cbfb6a8

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 18 in cbfb6a8

2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

• Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟

  • # Not Respectful TextYou suck
  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • fuckin white boys get things right next time
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in cbfb6a8

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in cbfb6a8

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in cbfb6a8

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in cbfb6a8

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in cbfb6a8

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in cbfb6a8

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in cbfb6a8

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in cbfb6a8

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in cbfb6a8

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in cbfb6a8

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in cbfb6a8

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in cbfb6a8

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

readable-readme/src/README.md

Line 3 in cbfb6a8

The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration.

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

[tianhaoz95]

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in acfe932

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

• Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 31 in acfe932

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

• Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 37 in acfe932

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

• Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 57 to 58 in acfe932

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

• Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 59 in acfe932

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

• Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 60 in acfe932

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

• Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 60 to 61 in acfe932

	is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is
	obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

• Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 62 in acfe932

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

• Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 70 in acfe932

This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,

• Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

readable-readme/CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in acfe932

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

readable-readme/README.md

Line 9 in acfe932

Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/README.md

Line 25 in acfe932

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

• Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in acfe932

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in acfe932

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in acfe932

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in acfe932

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in acfe932

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 22 in acfe932

It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed)

• Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in acfe932

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

• Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 11 in acfe932

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 13 in acfe932

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

• Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Lines 15 to 16 in acfe932

	excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were
	stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

• Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 17 in acfe932

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 23 in acfe932

Hmmm... This is really bad.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in acfe932

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in acfe932

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in acfe932

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in acfe932

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in acfe932

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in acfe932

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in acfe932

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in acfe932

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in acfe932

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in acfe932

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in acfe932

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in acfe932

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in acfe932

Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time.

• Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in acfe932

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in acfe932

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in acfe932

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in acfe932

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in acfe932

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in acfe932

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in acfe932

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in acfe932

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in acfe932

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in acfe932

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in acfe932

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in acfe932

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in acfe932

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in acfe932

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in acfe932

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in acfe932

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in acfe932

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in acfe932

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in acfe932

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in acfe932

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in acfe932

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in acfe932

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in acfe932

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 12 in acfe932

I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in acfe932

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in acfe932

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in acfe932

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in acfe932

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in acfe932

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in acfe932

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in acfe932

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in acfe932

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in acfe932

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in acfe932

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in acfe932

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 18 in acfe932

2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

• Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟

  • # Not Respectful TextYou suck
  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • fuckin white boys get things right next time
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in acfe932

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in acfe932

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in acfe932

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in acfe932

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in acfe932

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in acfe932

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in acfe932

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in acfe932

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in acfe932

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in acfe932

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in acfe932

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in acfe932

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

readable-readme/src/README.md

Line 3 in acfe932

The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration.

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

[tianhaoz95]

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in 38ccffa

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

• Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 31 in 38ccffa

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

• Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 37 in 38ccffa

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

• Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 57 to 58 in 38ccffa

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

• Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 59 in 38ccffa

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

• Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 60 in 38ccffa

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

• Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 60 to 61 in 38ccffa

	is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is
	obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

• Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 62 in 38ccffa

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

• Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 70 in 38ccffa

This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,

• Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

readable-readme/CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in 38ccffa

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

readable-readme/README.md

Line 9 in 38ccffa

Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/README.md

Line 25 in 38ccffa

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

• Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 38ccffa

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 38ccffa

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in 38ccffa

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in 38ccffa

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in 38ccffa

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 22 in 38ccffa

It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed)

• Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in 38ccffa

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

• Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 11 in 38ccffa

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 13 in 38ccffa

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

• Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Lines 15 to 16 in 38ccffa

	excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were
	stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

• Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 17 in 38ccffa

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 23 in 38ccffa

Hmmm... This is really bad.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 38ccffa

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 38ccffa

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 38ccffa

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 38ccffa

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 38ccffa

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in 38ccffa

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in 38ccffa

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 38ccffa

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 38ccffa

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in 38ccffa

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in 38ccffa

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in 38ccffa

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in 38ccffa

Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time.

• Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 38ccffa

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 38ccffa

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 38ccffa

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 38ccffa

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 38ccffa

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 38ccffa

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in 38ccffa

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in 38ccffa

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 38ccffa

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 38ccffa

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 38ccffa

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 38ccffa

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 38ccffa

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 38ccffa

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 38ccffa

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 38ccffa

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 38ccffa

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 38ccffa

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 38ccffa

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 38ccffa

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 38ccffa

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 38ccffa

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 38ccffa

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 12 in 38ccffa

I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 38ccffa

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 38ccffa

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 38ccffa

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 38ccffa

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 38ccffa

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 38ccffa

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 38ccffa

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 38ccffa

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 38ccffa

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 38ccffa

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 38ccffa

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 18 in 38ccffa

2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

• Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟

  • # Not Respectful TextYou suck
  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • fuckin white boys get things right next time
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 38ccffa

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 38ccffa

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 38ccffa

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 38ccffa

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 38ccffa

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in 38ccffa

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in 38ccffa

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 38ccffa

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 38ccffa

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in 38ccffa

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in 38ccffa

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in 38ccffa

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

readable-readme/src/README.md

Line 3 in 38ccffa

The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration.

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

[tianhaoz95]

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in 6159626

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

• Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 31 in 6159626

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

• Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 37 in 6159626

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

• Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 57 to 58 in 6159626

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

• Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 59 in 6159626

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

• Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 60 in 6159626

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

• Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 60 to 61 in 6159626

	is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is
	obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

• Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 62 in 6159626

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

• Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 70 in 6159626

This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,

• Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

readable-readme/CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in 6159626

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

readable-readme/README.md

Line 9 in 6159626

Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/README.md

Line 25 in 6159626

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

• Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 6159626

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 6159626

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in 6159626

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in 6159626

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in 6159626

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 22 in 6159626

It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed)

• Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in 6159626

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

• Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 11 in 6159626

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 13 in 6159626

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

• Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Lines 15 to 16 in 6159626

	excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were
	stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

• Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 17 in 6159626

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 23 in 6159626

Hmmm... This is really bad.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 6159626

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 6159626

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 6159626

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 6159626

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 6159626

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in 6159626

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in 6159626

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 6159626

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 6159626

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in 6159626

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in 6159626

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in 6159626

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in 6159626

Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time.

• Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 6159626

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 6159626

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 6159626

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 6159626

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 6159626

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 6159626

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in 6159626

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in 6159626

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 6159626

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 6159626

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 6159626

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 6159626

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 6159626

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 6159626

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 6159626

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 6159626

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 6159626

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 6159626

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 6159626

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 6159626

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 6159626

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 6159626

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 6159626

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 12 in 6159626

I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 6159626

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 6159626

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 6159626

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 6159626

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 6159626

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 6159626

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 6159626

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 6159626

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 6159626

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 6159626

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 6159626

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 18 in 6159626

2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

• Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟

  • # Not Respectful TextYou suck
  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • fuckin white boys get things right next time
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 6159626

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 6159626

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 6159626

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 6159626

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 6159626

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in 6159626

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in 6159626

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 6159626

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 6159626

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in 6159626

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in 6159626

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in 6159626

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

readable-readme/src/README.md

Line 3 in 6159626

The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration.

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

[tianhaoz95]

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in 1954472

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

• Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 31 in 1954472

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

• Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 37 in 1954472

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

• Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 57 to 58 in 1954472

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

• Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 59 in 1954472

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

• Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 60 in 1954472

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

• Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 60 to 61 in 1954472

	is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is
	obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

• Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 62 in 1954472

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

• Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 70 in 1954472

This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,

• Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

readable-readme/CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in 1954472

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

readable-readme/README.md

Line 9 in 1954472

Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/README.md

Line 25 in 1954472

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

• Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 1954472

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 1954472

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in 1954472

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in 1954472

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in 1954472

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 22 in 1954472

It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed)

• Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in 1954472

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

• Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 11 in 1954472

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 13 in 1954472

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

• Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Lines 15 to 16 in 1954472

	excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were
	stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

• Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 17 in 1954472

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 23 in 1954472

Hmmm... This is really bad.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 1954472

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 1954472

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 1954472

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 1954472

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 1954472

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in 1954472

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in 1954472

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 1954472

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 1954472

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in 1954472

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in 1954472

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in 1954472

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in 1954472

Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time.

• Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 1954472

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 1954472

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 1954472

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 1954472

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 1954472

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 1954472

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in 1954472

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in 1954472

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 1954472

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 1954472

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 1954472

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 1954472

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 1954472

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 1954472

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 1954472

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 1954472

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 1954472

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 1954472

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 1954472

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 1954472

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 1954472

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 1954472

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 1954472

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 12 in 1954472

I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 1954472

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 1954472

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 1954472

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 1954472

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 1954472

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 1954472

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 1954472

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 1954472

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 1954472

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 1954472

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 1954472

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 18 in 1954472

2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

• Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟

  • # Not Respectful TextYou suck
  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • fuckin white boys get things right next time
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 1954472

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 1954472

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 1954472

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 1954472

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 1954472

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in 1954472

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in 1954472

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 1954472

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 1954472

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in 1954472

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in 1954472

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in 1954472

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

readable-readme/src/README.md

Line 3 in 1954472

The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration.

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

[tianhaoz95]

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in b32deef

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

• Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 31 in b32deef

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

• Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 37 in b32deef

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

• Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 57 to 58 in b32deef

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

• Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 59 in b32deef

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

• Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 60 in b32deef

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

• Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 60 to 61 in b32deef

	is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is
	obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

• Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 62 in b32deef

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

• Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 70 in b32deef

This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,

• Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

readable-readme/CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in b32deef

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

readable-readme/README.md

Line 9 in b32deef

Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/README.md

Line 25 in b32deef

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

• Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in b32deef

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in b32deef

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in b32deef

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in b32deef

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in b32deef

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 22 in b32deef

It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed)

• Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in b32deef

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

• Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 11 in b32deef

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 13 in b32deef

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

• Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Lines 15 to 16 in b32deef

	excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were
	stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

• Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 17 in b32deef

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 23 in b32deef

Hmmm... This is really bad.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in b32deef

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in b32deef

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in b32deef

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in b32deef

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in b32deef

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in b32deef

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in b32deef

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in b32deef

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in b32deef

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in b32deef

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in b32deef

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in b32deef

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in b32deef

Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time.

• Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in b32deef

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in b32deef

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in b32deef

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in b32deef

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in b32deef

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in b32deef

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in b32deef

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in b32deef

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in b32deef

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in b32deef

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in b32deef

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in b32deef

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in b32deef

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in b32deef

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in b32deef

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in b32deef

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in b32deef

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in b32deef

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in b32deef

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in b32deef

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in b32deef

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in b32deef

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in b32deef

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 12 in b32deef

I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in b32deef

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in b32deef

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in b32deef

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in b32deef

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in b32deef

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in b32deef

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in b32deef

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in b32deef

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in b32deef

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in b32deef

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in b32deef

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 18 in b32deef

2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

• Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟

  • # Not Respectful TextYou suck
  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • fuckin white boys get things right next time
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in b32deef

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in b32deef

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in b32deef

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in b32deef

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in b32deef

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in b32deef

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in b32deef

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in b32deef

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in b32deef

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in b32deef

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in b32deef

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in b32deef

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

readable-readme/src/README.md

Line 3 in b32deef

The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration.

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

[tianhaoz95]

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in f73af28

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

• Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 31 in f73af28

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

• Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 37 in f73af28

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

• Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 57 to 58 in f73af28

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

• Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 59 in f73af28

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

• Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 60 in f73af28

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

• Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 60 to 61 in f73af28

	is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is
	obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

• Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 62 in f73af28

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

• Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 70 in f73af28

This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,

• Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

readable-readme/CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in f73af28

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

readable-readme/README.md

Line 9 in f73af28

Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/README.md

Line 25 in f73af28

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

• Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in f73af28

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in f73af28

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in f73af28

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in f73af28

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in f73af28

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 22 in f73af28

It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed)

• Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in f73af28

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

• Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 11 in f73af28

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 13 in f73af28

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

• Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Lines 15 to 16 in f73af28

	excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were
	stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

• Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 17 in f73af28

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 23 in f73af28

Hmmm... This is really bad.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in f73af28

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in f73af28

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in f73af28

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in f73af28

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in f73af28

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in f73af28

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in f73af28

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in f73af28

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in f73af28

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in f73af28

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in f73af28

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in f73af28

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in f73af28

Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time.

• Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in f73af28

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in f73af28

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in f73af28

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in f73af28

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in f73af28

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in f73af28

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in f73af28

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in f73af28

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in f73af28

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in f73af28

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in f73af28

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in f73af28

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in f73af28

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in f73af28

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in f73af28

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in f73af28

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in f73af28

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in f73af28

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in f73af28

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in f73af28

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in f73af28

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in f73af28

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in f73af28

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 12 in f73af28

I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in f73af28

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in f73af28

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in f73af28

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in f73af28

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in f73af28

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in f73af28

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in f73af28

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in f73af28

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in f73af28

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in f73af28

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in f73af28

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 18 in f73af28

2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

• Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟

  • # Not Respectful TextYou suck
  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • fuckin white boys get things right next time
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in f73af28

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in f73af28

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in f73af28

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in f73af28

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in f73af28

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in f73af28

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in f73af28

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in f73af28

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in f73af28

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in f73af28

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in f73af28

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in f73af28

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

readable-readme/src/README.md

Line 3 in f73af28

The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration.

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

[tianhaoz95]

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in 5e4cd8e

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

• Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 31 in 5e4cd8e

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

• Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 37 in 5e4cd8e

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

• Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 57 to 58 in 5e4cd8e

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

• Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 59 in 5e4cd8e

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

• Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 60 in 5e4cd8e

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

• Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 60 to 61 in 5e4cd8e

	is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is
	obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

• Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 62 in 5e4cd8e

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

• Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 70 in 5e4cd8e

This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,

• Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

readable-readme/CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in 5e4cd8e

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

readable-readme/README.md

Line 9 in 5e4cd8e

Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/README.md

Line 25 in 5e4cd8e

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

• Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 5e4cd8e

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 5e4cd8e

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in 5e4cd8e

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in 5e4cd8e

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in 5e4cd8e

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 22 in 5e4cd8e

It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed)

• Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in 5e4cd8e

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

• Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 11 in 5e4cd8e

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 13 in 5e4cd8e

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

• Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Lines 15 to 16 in 5e4cd8e

	excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were
	stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

• Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 17 in 5e4cd8e

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 23 in 5e4cd8e

Hmmm... This is really bad.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 5e4cd8e

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 5e4cd8e

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 5e4cd8e

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 5e4cd8e

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 5e4cd8e

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in 5e4cd8e

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in 5e4cd8e

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 5e4cd8e

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 5e4cd8e

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in 5e4cd8e

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in 5e4cd8e

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in 5e4cd8e

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in 5e4cd8e

Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time.

• Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 5e4cd8e

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 5e4cd8e

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 5e4cd8e

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 5e4cd8e

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 5e4cd8e

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 5e4cd8e

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in 5e4cd8e

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in 5e4cd8e

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 5e4cd8e

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 5e4cd8e

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 5e4cd8e

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 5e4cd8e

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 5e4cd8e

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 5e4cd8e

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 5e4cd8e

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 5e4cd8e

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 5e4cd8e

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 5e4cd8e

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 5e4cd8e

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 5e4cd8e

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 5e4cd8e

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 5e4cd8e

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 5e4cd8e

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 12 in 5e4cd8e

I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 5e4cd8e

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 5e4cd8e

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 5e4cd8e

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 5e4cd8e

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 5e4cd8e

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 5e4cd8e

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 5e4cd8e

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 5e4cd8e

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 5e4cd8e

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 5e4cd8e

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 5e4cd8e

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 18 in 5e4cd8e

2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

• Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟

  • # Not Respectful TextYou suck
  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • fuckin white boys get things right next time
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 5e4cd8e

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 5e4cd8e

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 5e4cd8e

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 5e4cd8e

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 5e4cd8e

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in 5e4cd8e

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in 5e4cd8e

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 5e4cd8e

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 5e4cd8e

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in 5e4cd8e

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in 5e4cd8e

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in 5e4cd8e

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

readable-readme/src/README.md

Line 3 in 5e4cd8e

The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration.

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

[tianhaoz95]

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in 0d7e0ef

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

• Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 31 in 0d7e0ef

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

• Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 37 in 0d7e0ef

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

• Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 57 to 58 in 0d7e0ef

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

• Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 59 in 0d7e0ef

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

• Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 60 in 0d7e0ef

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

• Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 60 to 61 in 0d7e0ef

	is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is
	obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

• Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 62 in 0d7e0ef

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

• Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 70 in 0d7e0ef

This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,

• Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

readable-readme/CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in 0d7e0ef

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

readable-readme/README.md

Line 9 in 0d7e0ef

Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/README.md

Line 25 in 0d7e0ef

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

• Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 0d7e0ef

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 0d7e0ef

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in 0d7e0ef

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in 0d7e0ef

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in 0d7e0ef

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 22 in 0d7e0ef

It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed)

• Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in 0d7e0ef

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

• Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 11 in 0d7e0ef

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 13 in 0d7e0ef

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

• Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Lines 15 to 16 in 0d7e0ef

	excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were
	stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

• Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 17 in 0d7e0ef

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 23 in 0d7e0ef

Hmmm... This is really bad.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 0d7e0ef

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 0d7e0ef

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 0d7e0ef

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 0d7e0ef

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 0d7e0ef

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in 0d7e0ef

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in 0d7e0ef

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 0d7e0ef

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 0d7e0ef

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in 0d7e0ef

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in 0d7e0ef

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in 0d7e0ef

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in 0d7e0ef

Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time.

• Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 0d7e0ef

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 0d7e0ef

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 0d7e0ef

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 0d7e0ef

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 0d7e0ef

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 0d7e0ef

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in 0d7e0ef

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in 0d7e0ef

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 0d7e0ef

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 0d7e0ef

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 0d7e0ef

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 0d7e0ef

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 0d7e0ef

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 0d7e0ef

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 0d7e0ef

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 0d7e0ef

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 0d7e0ef

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 0d7e0ef

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 0d7e0ef

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 0d7e0ef

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 0d7e0ef

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 0d7e0ef

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 0d7e0ef

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 12 in 0d7e0ef

I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 0d7e0ef

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 0d7e0ef

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 0d7e0ef

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 0d7e0ef

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 0d7e0ef

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 0d7e0ef

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 0d7e0ef

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 0d7e0ef

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 0d7e0ef

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 0d7e0ef

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 0d7e0ef

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 18 in 0d7e0ef

2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

• Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟

  • # Not Respectful TextYou suck
  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • fuckin white boys get things right next time
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 0d7e0ef

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 0d7e0ef

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 0d7e0ef

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 0d7e0ef

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 0d7e0ef

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in 0d7e0ef

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in 0d7e0ef

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 0d7e0ef

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 0d7e0ef

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in 0d7e0ef

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in 0d7e0ef

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in 0d7e0ef

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

readable-readme/src/README.md

Line 3 in 0d7e0ef

The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration.

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

[tianhaoz95]

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in 926106c

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

• Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 31 in 926106c

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

• Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 37 in 926106c

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

• Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 57 to 58 in 926106c

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

• Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 59 in 926106c

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

• Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 60 in 926106c

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

• Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 60 to 61 in 926106c

	is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is
	obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

• Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 62 in 926106c

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

• Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 70 in 926106c

This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,

• Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

readable-readme/CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in 926106c

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

readable-readme/README.md

Line 9 in 926106c

Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/README.md

Line 25 in 926106c

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

• Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 926106c

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 926106c

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in 926106c

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in 926106c

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in 926106c

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 22 in 926106c

It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed)

• Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in 926106c

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

• Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 11 in 926106c

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 13 in 926106c

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

• Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Lines 15 to 16 in 926106c

	excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were
	stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

• Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 17 in 926106c

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 23 in 926106c

Hmmm... This is really bad.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 926106c

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 926106c

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 926106c

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 926106c

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 926106c

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in 926106c

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in 926106c

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 926106c

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 926106c

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in 926106c

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in 926106c

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in 926106c

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in 926106c

Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time.

• Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 926106c

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 926106c

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 926106c

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 926106c

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 926106c

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 926106c

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in 926106c

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in 926106c

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 926106c

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 926106c

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 926106c

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 926106c

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 926106c

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 926106c

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 926106c

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 926106c

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 926106c

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 926106c

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 926106c

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 926106c

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 926106c

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 926106c

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 926106c

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 12 in 926106c

I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 926106c

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 926106c

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 926106c

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 926106c

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 926106c

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 926106c

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 926106c

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 926106c

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 926106c

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 926106c

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 926106c

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 18 in 926106c

2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

• Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟

  • # Not Respectful TextYou suck
  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • fuckin white boys get things right next time
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 926106c

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 926106c

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 926106c

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 926106c

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 926106c

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in 926106c

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in 926106c

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 926106c

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 926106c

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in 926106c

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in 926106c

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in 926106c

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

readable-readme/src/README.md

Line 3 in 926106c

The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration.

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

[tianhaoz95]

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in addfefb

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

• Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 31 in addfefb

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

• Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 37 in addfefb

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

• Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 57 to 58 in addfefb

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

• Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 59 in addfefb

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

• Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 60 in addfefb

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

• Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 60 to 61 in addfefb

	is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is
	obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

• Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 62 in addfefb

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

• Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 70 in addfefb

This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,

• Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

readable-readme/CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in addfefb

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

readable-readme/README.md

Line 9 in addfefb

Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/README.md

Line 25 in addfefb

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

• Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in addfefb

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in addfefb

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in addfefb

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in addfefb

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in addfefb

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 22 in addfefb

It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed)

• Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in addfefb

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

• Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 11 in addfefb

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 13 in addfefb

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

• Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Lines 15 to 16 in addfefb

	excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were
	stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

• Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 17 in addfefb

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 23 in addfefb

Hmmm... This is really bad.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in addfefb

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in addfefb

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in addfefb

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in addfefb

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in addfefb

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in addfefb

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in addfefb

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in addfefb

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in addfefb

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in addfefb

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in addfefb

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in addfefb

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in addfefb

Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time.

• Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in addfefb

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in addfefb

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in addfefb

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in addfefb

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in addfefb

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in addfefb

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in addfefb

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in addfefb

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in addfefb

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in addfefb

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in addfefb

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in addfefb

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in addfefb

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in addfefb

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in addfefb

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in addfefb

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in addfefb

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in addfefb

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in addfefb

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in addfefb

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in addfefb

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in addfefb

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in addfefb

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 12 in addfefb

I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in addfefb

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in addfefb

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in addfefb

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in addfefb

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in addfefb

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in addfefb

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in addfefb

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in addfefb

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in addfefb

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in addfefb

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in addfefb

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 18 in addfefb

2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

• Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟

  • # Not Respectful TextYou suck
  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • fuckin white boys get things right next time
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in addfefb

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in addfefb

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in addfefb

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in addfefb

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in addfefb

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in addfefb

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in addfefb

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in addfefb

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in addfefb

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in addfefb

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in addfefb

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in addfefb

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

readable-readme/src/README.md

Line 3 in addfefb

The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration.

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

[tianhaoz95]

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in b183796

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

• Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 31 in b183796

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

• Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 37 in b183796

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

• Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 57 to 58 in b183796

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

• Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 59 in b183796

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

• Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 60 in b183796

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

• Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 60 to 61 in b183796

	is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is
	obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

• Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 62 in b183796

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

• Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 70 in b183796

This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,

• Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

readable-readme/CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in b183796

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

readable-readme/README.md

Line 9 in b183796

Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/README.md

Line 25 in b183796

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

• Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in b183796

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in b183796

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in b183796

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in b183796

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in b183796

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 22 in b183796

It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed)

• Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in b183796

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

• Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 11 in b183796

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 13 in b183796

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

• Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Lines 15 to 16 in b183796

	excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were
	stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

• Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 17 in b183796

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 23 in b183796

Hmmm... This is really bad.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in b183796

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in b183796

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in b183796

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in b183796

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in b183796

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in b183796

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in b183796

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in b183796

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in b183796

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in b183796

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in b183796

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in b183796

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in b183796

Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time.

• Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in b183796

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in b183796

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in b183796

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in b183796

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in b183796

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in b183796

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in b183796

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in b183796

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in b183796

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in b183796

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in b183796

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in b183796

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in b183796

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in b183796

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in b183796

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in b183796

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in b183796

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in b183796

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in b183796

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in b183796

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in b183796

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in b183796

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in b183796

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 12 in b183796

I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in b183796

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in b183796

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in b183796

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in b183796

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in b183796

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in b183796

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in b183796

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in b183796

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in b183796

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in b183796

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in b183796

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 18 in b183796

2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

• Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟

  • # Not Respectful TextYou suck
  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • fuckin white boys get things right next time
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in b183796

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in b183796

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in b183796

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in b183796

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in b183796

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in b183796

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in b183796

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in b183796

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in b183796

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in b183796

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in b183796

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in b183796

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

readable-readme/src/README.md

Line 3 in b183796

The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration.

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

[tianhaoz95]

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in 1d40427

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

• Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 31 in 1d40427

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

• Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 37 in 1d40427

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

• Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 57 to 58 in 1d40427

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

• Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 59 in 1d40427

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

• Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 60 in 1d40427

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

• Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 60 to 61 in 1d40427

	is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is
	obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

• Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 62 in 1d40427

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

• Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 70 in 1d40427

This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,

• Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

readable-readme/CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in 1d40427

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

readable-readme/README.md

Line 9 in 1d40427

Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/README.md

Line 25 in 1d40427

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

• Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 1d40427

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 1d40427

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in 1d40427

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in 1d40427

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in 1d40427

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 22 in 1d40427

It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed)

• Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in 1d40427

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

• Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 11 in 1d40427

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 13 in 1d40427

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

• Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Lines 15 to 16 in 1d40427

	excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were
	stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

• Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 17 in 1d40427

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 23 in 1d40427

Hmmm... This is really bad.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 1d40427

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 1d40427

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 1d40427

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 1d40427

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 1d40427

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in 1d40427

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in 1d40427

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 1d40427

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 1d40427

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in 1d40427

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in 1d40427

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in 1d40427

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in 1d40427

Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time.

• Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 1d40427

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 1d40427

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 1d40427

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 1d40427

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 1d40427

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 1d40427

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in 1d40427

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in 1d40427

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 1d40427

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 1d40427

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 1d40427

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 1d40427

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 1d40427

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 1d40427

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 1d40427

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 1d40427

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 1d40427

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 1d40427

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 1d40427

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 1d40427

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 1d40427

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 1d40427

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 1d40427

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 12 in 1d40427

I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 1d40427

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 1d40427

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 1d40427

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 1d40427

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 1d40427

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 1d40427

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 1d40427

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 1d40427

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 1d40427

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 1d40427

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 1d40427

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 18 in 1d40427

2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

• Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟

  • # Not Respectful TextYou suck
  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • fuckin white boys get things right next time
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 1d40427

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 1d40427

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 1d40427

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 1d40427

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 1d40427

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in 1d40427

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in 1d40427

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 1d40427

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 1d40427

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in 1d40427

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in 1d40427

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in 1d40427

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

readable-readme/src/README.md

Line 3 in 1d40427

The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration.

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

[tianhaoz95]

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in 3928b7e

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

• Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 31 in 3928b7e

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

• Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 37 in 3928b7e

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

• Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 57 to 58 in 3928b7e

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

• Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 59 in 3928b7e

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

• Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 60 in 3928b7e

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

• Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 60 to 61 in 3928b7e

	is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is
	obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

• Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 62 in 3928b7e

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

• Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 70 in 3928b7e

This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,

• Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

readable-readme/CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in 3928b7e

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

readable-readme/README.md

Line 9 in 3928b7e

Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/README.md

Line 25 in 3928b7e

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

• Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 3928b7e

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 3928b7e

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in 3928b7e

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in 3928b7e

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in 3928b7e

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 22 in 3928b7e

It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed)

• Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in 3928b7e

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

• Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 11 in 3928b7e

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 13 in 3928b7e

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

• Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Lines 15 to 16 in 3928b7e

	excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were
	stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

• Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 17 in 3928b7e

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 23 in 3928b7e

Hmmm... This is really bad.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 3928b7e

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 3928b7e

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 3928b7e

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 3928b7e

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 3928b7e

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in 3928b7e

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in 3928b7e

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 3928b7e

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 3928b7e

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in 3928b7e

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in 3928b7e

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in 3928b7e

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in 3928b7e

Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time.

• Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 3928b7e

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 3928b7e

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 3928b7e

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 3928b7e

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 3928b7e

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 3928b7e

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in 3928b7e

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in 3928b7e

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 3928b7e

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 3928b7e

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 3928b7e

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 3928b7e

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 3928b7e

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 3928b7e

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 3928b7e

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 3928b7e

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 3928b7e

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 3928b7e

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 3928b7e

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 3928b7e

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 3928b7e

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 3928b7e

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 3928b7e

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 12 in 3928b7e

I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 3928b7e

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 3928b7e

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 3928b7e

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 3928b7e

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 3928b7e

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 3928b7e

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 3928b7e

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 3928b7e

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 3928b7e

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 3928b7e

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 3928b7e

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 18 in 3928b7e

2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

• Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟

  • # Not Respectful TextYou suck
  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • fuckin white boys get things right next time
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 3928b7e

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 3928b7e

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 3928b7e

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 3928b7e

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 3928b7e

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in 3928b7e

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in 3928b7e

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 3928b7e

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 3928b7e

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in 3928b7e

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in 3928b7e

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in 3928b7e

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

readable-readme/src/README.md

Line 3 in 3928b7e

The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration.

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

[tianhaoz95]

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in 3200a50

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

• Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 31 in 3200a50

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

• Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 37 in 3200a50

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

• Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 57 to 58 in 3200a50

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

• Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 59 in 3200a50

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

• Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 60 in 3200a50

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

• Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 60 to 61 in 3200a50

	is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is
	obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

• Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 62 in 3200a50

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

• Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 70 in 3200a50

This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,

• Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

readable-readme/CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in 3200a50

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

readable-readme/README.md

Line 9 in 3200a50

Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/README.md

Line 25 in 3200a50

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

• Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 3200a50

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 3200a50

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in 3200a50

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in 3200a50

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in 3200a50

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 22 in 3200a50

It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed)

• Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in 3200a50

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

• Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 11 in 3200a50

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 13 in 3200a50

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

• Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Lines 15 to 16 in 3200a50

	excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were
	stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

• Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 17 in 3200a50

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 23 in 3200a50

Hmmm... This is really bad.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 3200a50

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 3200a50

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 3200a50

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 3200a50

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 3200a50

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in 3200a50

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in 3200a50

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 3200a50

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 3200a50

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in 3200a50

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in 3200a50

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in 3200a50

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in 3200a50

Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time.

• Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 3200a50

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 3200a50

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 3200a50

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 3200a50

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 3200a50

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 3200a50

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in 3200a50

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in 3200a50

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 3200a50

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 3200a50

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 3200a50

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 3200a50

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 3200a50

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 3200a50

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 3200a50

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 3200a50

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 3200a50

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 3200a50

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 3200a50

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 3200a50

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 3200a50

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 3200a50

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 3200a50

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 12 in 3200a50

I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 3200a50

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 3200a50

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 3200a50

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 3200a50

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 3200a50

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 3200a50

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 3200a50

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 3200a50

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 3200a50

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 3200a50

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 3200a50

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 18 in 3200a50

2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

• Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟

  • # Not Respectful TextYou suck
  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • fuckin white boys get things right next time
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 3200a50

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 3200a50

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 3200a50

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 3200a50

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 3200a50

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in 3200a50

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in 3200a50

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 3200a50

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 3200a50

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in 3200a50

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in 3200a50

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in 3200a50

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

readable-readme/src/README.md

Line 3 in 3200a50

The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration.

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

[tianhaoz95]

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in cfd7357

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

• Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 31 in cfd7357

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

• Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 37 in cfd7357

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

• Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 57 to 58 in cfd7357

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

• Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 59 in cfd7357

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

• Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 60 in cfd7357

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

• Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 60 to 61 in cfd7357

	is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is
	obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

• Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 62 in cfd7357

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

• Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 70 in cfd7357

This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,

• Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

readable-readme/CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in cfd7357

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

readable-readme/README.md

Line 9 in cfd7357

Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/README.md

Line 25 in cfd7357

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

• Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in cfd7357

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in cfd7357

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in cfd7357

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in cfd7357

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in cfd7357

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 22 in cfd7357

It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed)

• Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in cfd7357

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

• Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 11 in cfd7357

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 13 in cfd7357

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

• Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Lines 15 to 16 in cfd7357

	excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were
	stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

• Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 17 in cfd7357

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 23 in cfd7357

Hmmm... This is really bad.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in cfd7357

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in cfd7357

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in cfd7357

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in cfd7357

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in cfd7357

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in cfd7357

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in cfd7357

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in cfd7357

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in cfd7357

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in cfd7357

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in cfd7357

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in cfd7357

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in cfd7357

Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time.

• Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in cfd7357

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in cfd7357

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in cfd7357

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in cfd7357

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in cfd7357

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in cfd7357

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in cfd7357

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in cfd7357

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in cfd7357

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in cfd7357

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in cfd7357

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in cfd7357

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in cfd7357

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in cfd7357

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in cfd7357

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in cfd7357

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in cfd7357

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in cfd7357

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in cfd7357

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in cfd7357

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in cfd7357

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in cfd7357

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in cfd7357

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 12 in cfd7357

I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in cfd7357

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in cfd7357

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in cfd7357

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in cfd7357

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in cfd7357

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in cfd7357

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in cfd7357

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in cfd7357

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in cfd7357

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in cfd7357

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in cfd7357

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 18 in cfd7357

2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

• Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟

  • # Not Respectful TextYou suck
  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • fuckin white boys get things right next time
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in cfd7357

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in cfd7357

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in cfd7357

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in cfd7357

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in cfd7357

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in cfd7357

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in cfd7357

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in cfd7357

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in cfd7357

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in cfd7357

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in cfd7357

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in cfd7357

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

readable-readme/src/README.md

Line 3 in cfd7357

The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration.

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

[tianhaoz95]

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in b65c3e9

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

• Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 31 in b65c3e9

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

• Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 37 in b65c3e9

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

• Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 57 to 58 in b65c3e9

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

• Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 59 in b65c3e9

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

• Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 60 in b65c3e9

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

• Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 60 to 61 in b65c3e9

	is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is
	obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

• Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 62 in b65c3e9

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

• Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 70 in b65c3e9

This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,

• Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

readable-readme/CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in b65c3e9

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

readable-readme/README.md

Line 9 in b65c3e9

Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/README.md

Line 25 in b65c3e9

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

• Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in b65c3e9

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in b65c3e9

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in b65c3e9

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in b65c3e9

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in b65c3e9

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 22 in b65c3e9

It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed)

• Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in b65c3e9

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

• Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 11 in b65c3e9

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 13 in b65c3e9

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

• Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Lines 15 to 16 in b65c3e9

	excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were
	stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

• Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 17 in b65c3e9

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 23 in b65c3e9

Hmmm... This is really bad.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in b65c3e9

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in b65c3e9

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in b65c3e9

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in b65c3e9

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in b65c3e9

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in b65c3e9

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in b65c3e9

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in b65c3e9

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in b65c3e9

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in b65c3e9

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in b65c3e9

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in b65c3e9

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in b65c3e9

Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time.

• Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in b65c3e9

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in b65c3e9

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in b65c3e9

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in b65c3e9

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in b65c3e9

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in b65c3e9

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in b65c3e9

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in b65c3e9

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in b65c3e9

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in b65c3e9

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in b65c3e9

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in b65c3e9

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in b65c3e9

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in b65c3e9

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in b65c3e9

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in b65c3e9

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in b65c3e9

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in b65c3e9

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in b65c3e9

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in b65c3e9

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in b65c3e9

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in b65c3e9

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in b65c3e9

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 12 in b65c3e9

I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in b65c3e9

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in b65c3e9

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in b65c3e9

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in b65c3e9

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in b65c3e9

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in b65c3e9

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in b65c3e9

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in b65c3e9

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in b65c3e9

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in b65c3e9

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in b65c3e9

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 18 in b65c3e9

2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

• Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟

  • # Not Respectful TextYou suck
  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • fuckin white boys get things right next time
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in b65c3e9

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in b65c3e9

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in b65c3e9

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in b65c3e9

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in b65c3e9

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in b65c3e9

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in b65c3e9

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in b65c3e9

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in b65c3e9

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in b65c3e9

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in b65c3e9

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in b65c3e9

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

readable-readme/src/README.md

Line 3 in b65c3e9

The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration.

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

[tianhaoz95]

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in bf8ee2c

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

• Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 31 in bf8ee2c

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

• Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 37 in bf8ee2c

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

• Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 57 to 58 in bf8ee2c

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

• Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 59 in bf8ee2c

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

• Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 60 in bf8ee2c

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

• Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 60 to 61 in bf8ee2c

	is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is
	obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

• Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 62 in bf8ee2c

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

• Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 70 in bf8ee2c

This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,

• Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

readable-readme/CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in bf8ee2c

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

readable-readme/README.md

Line 9 in bf8ee2c

Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/README.md

Line 25 in bf8ee2c

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

• Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in bf8ee2c

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in bf8ee2c

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in bf8ee2c

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in bf8ee2c

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in bf8ee2c

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 22 in bf8ee2c

It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed)

• Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in bf8ee2c

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

• Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 11 in bf8ee2c

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 13 in bf8ee2c

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

• Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Lines 15 to 16 in bf8ee2c

	excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were
	stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

• Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 17 in bf8ee2c

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 23 in bf8ee2c

Hmmm... This is really bad.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in bf8ee2c

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in bf8ee2c

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in bf8ee2c

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in bf8ee2c

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in bf8ee2c

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in bf8ee2c

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in bf8ee2c

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in bf8ee2c

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in bf8ee2c

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in bf8ee2c

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in bf8ee2c

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in bf8ee2c

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in bf8ee2c

Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time.

• Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in bf8ee2c

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in bf8ee2c

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in bf8ee2c

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in bf8ee2c

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in bf8ee2c

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in bf8ee2c

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in bf8ee2c

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in bf8ee2c

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in bf8ee2c

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in bf8ee2c

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in bf8ee2c

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in bf8ee2c

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in bf8ee2c

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in bf8ee2c

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in bf8ee2c

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in bf8ee2c

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in bf8ee2c

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in bf8ee2c

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in bf8ee2c

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in bf8ee2c

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in bf8ee2c

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in bf8ee2c

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in bf8ee2c

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 12 in bf8ee2c

I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in bf8ee2c

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in bf8ee2c

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in bf8ee2c

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in bf8ee2c

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in bf8ee2c

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in bf8ee2c

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in bf8ee2c

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in bf8ee2c

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in bf8ee2c

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in bf8ee2c

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in bf8ee2c

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 18 in bf8ee2c

2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

• Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟

  • # Not Respectful TextYou suck
  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • fuckin white boys get things right next time
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in bf8ee2c

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in bf8ee2c

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in bf8ee2c

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in bf8ee2c

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in bf8ee2c

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in bf8ee2c

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in bf8ee2c

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in bf8ee2c

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in bf8ee2c

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in bf8ee2c

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in bf8ee2c

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in bf8ee2c

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

readable-readme/src/README.md

Line 3 in bf8ee2c

The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration.

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

[tianhaoz95]

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in d0a0510

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

• Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 31 in d0a0510

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

• Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 37 in d0a0510

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

• Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 57 to 58 in d0a0510

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

• Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 59 in d0a0510

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

• Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 60 in d0a0510

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

• Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 60 to 61 in d0a0510

	is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is
	obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

• Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 62 in d0a0510

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

• Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 70 in d0a0510

This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,

• Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

readable-readme/CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in d0a0510

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

readable-readme/README.md

Line 9 in d0a0510

Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/README.md

Line 25 in d0a0510

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

• Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in d0a0510

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in d0a0510

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in d0a0510

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in d0a0510

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in d0a0510

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 22 in d0a0510

It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed)

• Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in d0a0510

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

• Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 11 in d0a0510

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 13 in d0a0510

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

• Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Lines 15 to 16 in d0a0510

	excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were
	stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

• Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 17 in d0a0510

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 23 in d0a0510

Hmmm... This is really bad.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in d0a0510

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in d0a0510

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in d0a0510

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in d0a0510

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in d0a0510

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in d0a0510

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in d0a0510

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in d0a0510

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in d0a0510

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in d0a0510

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in d0a0510

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in d0a0510

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in d0a0510

Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time.

• Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in d0a0510

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in d0a0510

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in d0a0510

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in d0a0510

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in d0a0510

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in d0a0510

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in d0a0510

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in d0a0510

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in d0a0510

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in d0a0510

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in d0a0510

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in d0a0510

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in d0a0510

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in d0a0510

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in d0a0510

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in d0a0510

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in d0a0510

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in d0a0510

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in d0a0510

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in d0a0510

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in d0a0510

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in d0a0510

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in d0a0510

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 12 in d0a0510

I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in d0a0510

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in d0a0510

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in d0a0510

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in d0a0510

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in d0a0510

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in d0a0510

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in d0a0510

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in d0a0510

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in d0a0510

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in d0a0510

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in d0a0510

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 18 in d0a0510

2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

• Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟

  • # Not Respectful TextYou suck
  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • fuckin white boys get things right next time
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in d0a0510

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in d0a0510

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in d0a0510

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in d0a0510

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in d0a0510

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in d0a0510

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in d0a0510

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in d0a0510

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in d0a0510

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in d0a0510

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in d0a0510

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in d0a0510

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

readable-readme/src/README.md

Line 3 in d0a0510

The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration.

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

[tianhaoz95]

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in 6ca09f7

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

• Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 31 in 6ca09f7

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

• Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 37 in 6ca09f7

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

• Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 57 to 58 in 6ca09f7

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

• Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 59 in 6ca09f7

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

• Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 60 in 6ca09f7

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

• Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 60 to 61 in 6ca09f7

	is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is
	obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

• Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 62 in 6ca09f7

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

• Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 70 in 6ca09f7

This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,

• Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

readable-readme/CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in 6ca09f7

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

readable-readme/README.md

Line 9 in 6ca09f7

Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/README.md

Line 25 in 6ca09f7

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

• Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 6ca09f7

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 6ca09f7

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in 6ca09f7

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in 6ca09f7

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in 6ca09f7

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 22 in 6ca09f7

It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed)

• Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in 6ca09f7

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

• Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 11 in 6ca09f7

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 13 in 6ca09f7

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

• Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Lines 15 to 16 in 6ca09f7

	excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were
	stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

• Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 17 in 6ca09f7

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 23 in 6ca09f7

Hmmm... This is really bad.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 6ca09f7

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 6ca09f7

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 6ca09f7

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 6ca09f7

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 6ca09f7

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in 6ca09f7

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in 6ca09f7

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 6ca09f7

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 6ca09f7

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in 6ca09f7

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in 6ca09f7

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in 6ca09f7

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in 6ca09f7

Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time.

• Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 6ca09f7

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 6ca09f7

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 6ca09f7

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 6ca09f7

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 6ca09f7

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 6ca09f7

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in 6ca09f7

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in 6ca09f7

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 6ca09f7

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 6ca09f7

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 6ca09f7

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 6ca09f7

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 6ca09f7

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 6ca09f7

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 6ca09f7

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 6ca09f7

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 6ca09f7

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 6ca09f7

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 6ca09f7

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 6ca09f7

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 6ca09f7

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 6ca09f7

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 6ca09f7

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 12 in 6ca09f7

I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 6ca09f7

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 6ca09f7

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 6ca09f7

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 6ca09f7

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 6ca09f7

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 6ca09f7

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 6ca09f7

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 6ca09f7

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 6ca09f7

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 6ca09f7

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 6ca09f7

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 18 in 6ca09f7

2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

• Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟

  • # Not Respectful TextYou suck
  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • fuckin white boys get things right next time
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 6ca09f7

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 6ca09f7

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 6ca09f7

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 6ca09f7

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 6ca09f7

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in 6ca09f7

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in 6ca09f7

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 6ca09f7

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 6ca09f7

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in 6ca09f7

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in 6ca09f7

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in 6ca09f7

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

readable-readme/src/README.md

Line 3 in 6ca09f7

The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration.

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

[tianhaoz95]

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in 6ea5ac1

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

• Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 31 in 6ea5ac1

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

• Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 37 in 6ea5ac1

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

• Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 57 to 58 in 6ea5ac1

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

• Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 59 in 6ea5ac1

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

• Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 60 in 6ea5ac1

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

• Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 60 to 61 in 6ea5ac1

	is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is
	obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

• Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 62 in 6ea5ac1

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

• Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 70 in 6ea5ac1

This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,

• Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

readable-readme/CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in 6ea5ac1

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

readable-readme/README.md

Line 9 in 6ea5ac1

Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/README.md

Line 25 in 6ea5ac1

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

• Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 6ea5ac1

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 6ea5ac1

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in 6ea5ac1

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in 6ea5ac1

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in 6ea5ac1

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 22 in 6ea5ac1

It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed)

• Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in 6ea5ac1

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

• Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 11 in 6ea5ac1

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 13 in 6ea5ac1

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

• Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Lines 15 to 16 in 6ea5ac1

	excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were
	stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

• Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 17 in 6ea5ac1

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 23 in 6ea5ac1

Hmmm... This is really bad.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 6ea5ac1

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 6ea5ac1

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 6ea5ac1

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 6ea5ac1

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 6ea5ac1

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in 6ea5ac1

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in 6ea5ac1

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 6ea5ac1

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 6ea5ac1

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in 6ea5ac1

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in 6ea5ac1

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in 6ea5ac1

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in 6ea5ac1

Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time.

• Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 6ea5ac1

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 6ea5ac1

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 6ea5ac1

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 6ea5ac1

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 6ea5ac1

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 6ea5ac1

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in 6ea5ac1

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in 6ea5ac1

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 6ea5ac1

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 6ea5ac1

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 6ea5ac1

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 6ea5ac1

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 6ea5ac1

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 6ea5ac1

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 6ea5ac1

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 6ea5ac1

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 6ea5ac1

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 6ea5ac1

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 6ea5ac1

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 6ea5ac1

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 6ea5ac1

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 6ea5ac1

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 6ea5ac1

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 12 in 6ea5ac1

I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 6ea5ac1

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 6ea5ac1

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 6ea5ac1

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 6ea5ac1

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 6ea5ac1

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 6ea5ac1

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 6ea5ac1

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 6ea5ac1

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 6ea5ac1

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 6ea5ac1

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 6ea5ac1

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 18 in 6ea5ac1

2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

• Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟

  • # Not Respectful TextYou suck
  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • fuckin white boys get things right next time
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 6ea5ac1

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 6ea5ac1

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 6ea5ac1

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 6ea5ac1

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 6ea5ac1

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in 6ea5ac1

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in 6ea5ac1

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 6ea5ac1

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 6ea5ac1

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in 6ea5ac1

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in 6ea5ac1

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in 6ea5ac1

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

readable-readme/src/README.md

Line 3 in 6ea5ac1

The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration.

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

[tianhaoz95]

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in c56a3ba

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

• Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 31 in c56a3ba

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

• Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 37 in c56a3ba

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

• Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 57 to 58 in c56a3ba

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

• Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 59 in c56a3ba

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

• Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 60 in c56a3ba

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

• Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 60 to 61 in c56a3ba

	is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is
	obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

• Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 62 in c56a3ba

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

• Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 70 in c56a3ba

This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,

• Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

readable-readme/CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in c56a3ba

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

readable-readme/README.md

Line 9 in c56a3ba

Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/README.md

Line 25 in c56a3ba

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

• Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in c56a3ba

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in c56a3ba

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in c56a3ba

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in c56a3ba

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in c56a3ba

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 22 in c56a3ba

It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed)

• Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in c56a3ba

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

• Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 11 in c56a3ba

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 13 in c56a3ba

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

• Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Lines 15 to 16 in c56a3ba

	excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were
	stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

• Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 17 in c56a3ba

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 23 in c56a3ba

Hmmm... This is really bad.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in c56a3ba

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in c56a3ba

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in c56a3ba

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in c56a3ba

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in c56a3ba

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in c56a3ba

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in c56a3ba

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in c56a3ba

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in c56a3ba

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in c56a3ba

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in c56a3ba

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in c56a3ba

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in c56a3ba

Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time.

• Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in c56a3ba

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in c56a3ba

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in c56a3ba

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in c56a3ba

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in c56a3ba

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in c56a3ba

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in c56a3ba

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in c56a3ba

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in c56a3ba

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in c56a3ba

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in c56a3ba

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in c56a3ba

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in c56a3ba

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in c56a3ba

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in c56a3ba

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in c56a3ba

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in c56a3ba

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in c56a3ba

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in c56a3ba

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in c56a3ba

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in c56a3ba

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in c56a3ba

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in c56a3ba

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 12 in c56a3ba

I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in c56a3ba

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in c56a3ba

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in c56a3ba

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in c56a3ba

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in c56a3ba

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in c56a3ba

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in c56a3ba

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in c56a3ba

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in c56a3ba

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in c56a3ba

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in c56a3ba

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 18 in c56a3ba

2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

• Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟

  • # Not Respectful TextYou suck
  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • fuckin white boys get things right next time
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in c56a3ba

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in c56a3ba

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in c56a3ba

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in c56a3ba

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in c56a3ba

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in c56a3ba

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in c56a3ba

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in c56a3ba

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in c56a3ba

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in c56a3ba

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in c56a3ba

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in c56a3ba

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

readable-readme/src/README.md

Line 3 in c56a3ba

The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration.

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

[tianhaoz95]

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in 72efcc3

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

• Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 31 in 72efcc3

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

• Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 37 in 72efcc3

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

• Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 57 to 58 in 72efcc3

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

• Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 59 in 72efcc3

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

• Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 60 in 72efcc3

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

• Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 60 to 61 in 72efcc3

	is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is
	obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

• Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 62 in 72efcc3

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

• Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 70 in 72efcc3

This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,

• Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

readable-readme/CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in 72efcc3

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

readable-readme/README.md

Line 9 in 72efcc3

Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/README.md

Line 25 in 72efcc3

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

• Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 72efcc3

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 72efcc3

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in 72efcc3

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in 72efcc3

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in 72efcc3

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 22 in 72efcc3

It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed)

• Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in 72efcc3

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

• Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 11 in 72efcc3

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 13 in 72efcc3

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

• Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Lines 15 to 16 in 72efcc3

	excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were
	stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

• Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 17 in 72efcc3

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 23 in 72efcc3

Hmmm... This is really bad.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 72efcc3

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 72efcc3

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 72efcc3

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 72efcc3

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 72efcc3

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in 72efcc3

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in 72efcc3

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 72efcc3

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 72efcc3

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in 72efcc3

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in 72efcc3

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in 72efcc3

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in 72efcc3

Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time.

• Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 72efcc3

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 72efcc3

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 72efcc3

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 72efcc3

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 72efcc3

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 72efcc3

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in 72efcc3

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in 72efcc3

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 72efcc3

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 72efcc3

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 72efcc3

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 72efcc3

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 72efcc3

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 72efcc3

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 72efcc3

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 72efcc3

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 72efcc3

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 72efcc3

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 72efcc3

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 72efcc3

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 72efcc3

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 72efcc3

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 72efcc3

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 12 in 72efcc3

I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 72efcc3

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 72efcc3

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 72efcc3

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 72efcc3

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 72efcc3

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 72efcc3

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 72efcc3

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 72efcc3

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 72efcc3

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 72efcc3

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 72efcc3

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 18 in 72efcc3

2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

• Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟

  • # Not Respectful TextYou suck
  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • fuckin white boys get things right next time
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 72efcc3

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 72efcc3

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 72efcc3

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 72efcc3

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 72efcc3

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in 72efcc3

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in 72efcc3

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 72efcc3

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 72efcc3

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in 72efcc3

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in 72efcc3

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in 72efcc3

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

readable-readme/src/README.md

Line 3 in 72efcc3

The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration.

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

[tianhaoz95]

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in 72efcc3

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

• Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 31 in 72efcc3

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

• Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 37 in 72efcc3

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

• Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 57 to 58 in 72efcc3

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

• Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 59 in 72efcc3

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

• Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 60 in 72efcc3

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

• Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Lines 60 to 61 in 72efcc3

	is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is
	obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

• Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 62 in 72efcc3

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

• Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 70 in 72efcc3

This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,

• Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

readable-readme/CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in 72efcc3

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

readable-readme/README.md

Line 9 in 72efcc3

Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/README.md

Line 25 in 72efcc3

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

• Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 72efcc3

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 72efcc3

In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in 72efcc3

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in 72efcc3

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 13 in 72efcc3

This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

• Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/docs/contributors.md

Line 22 in 72efcc3

It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed)

• Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in 72efcc3

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

• Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 11 in 72efcc3

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 13 in 72efcc3

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

• Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Lines 15 to 16 in 72efcc3

	excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were
	stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

• Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 17 in 72efcc3

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

• Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 23 in 72efcc3

Hmmm... This is really bad.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 72efcc3

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 72efcc3

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 72efcc3

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 72efcc3

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 72efcc3

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in 72efcc3

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in 72efcc3

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 72efcc3

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 72efcc3

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in 72efcc3

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in 72efcc3

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in 72efcc3

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in 72efcc3

Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time.

• Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 72efcc3

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 72efcc3

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 72efcc3

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 72efcc3

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 72efcc3

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 7 in 72efcc3

ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

• Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in 72efcc3

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 8 in 72efcc3

I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 72efcc3

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 72efcc3

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 72efcc3

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 72efcc3

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 72efcc3

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 72efcc3

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 9 in 72efcc3

Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 72efcc3

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 72efcc3

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 72efcc3

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 72efcc3

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 72efcc3

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 72efcc3

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 72efcc3

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 10 in 72efcc3

third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 12 in 72efcc3

I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way.

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 72efcc3

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 72efcc3

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 72efcc3

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 72efcc3

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 14 in 72efcc3

ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

• Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 72efcc3

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 72efcc3

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 72efcc3

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 72efcc3

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 72efcc3

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 16 in 72efcc3

1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

• Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/offensive.md

Line 18 in 72efcc3

2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

• Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟

  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • dont diss that shit on him

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟

  • # Not Respectful TextYou suck
  • Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
  • i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
  • dont diss that shit on him
  • fuckin white boys get things right next time
  • this is ridiculous
  • But please we are not stupid people
  • I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 72efcc3

# This readme should be ignored.

• Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 72efcc3

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 3 in 72efcc3

Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

• Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 72efcc3

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 4 in 72efcc3

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

• Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 10 in 72efcc3

hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

• Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 11 in 72efcc3

thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

• Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 72efcc3

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 14 in 72efcc3

There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

• Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 15 in 72efcc3

so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

• Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 16 in 72efcc3

probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

• Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 17 in 72efcc3

it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

• Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

readable-readme/src/README.md

Line 3 in 72efcc3

The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration.

• Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

• Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌

• Check for insult: no issue found 👌

• Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌

• Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌

• Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌

• Check for threating content: no issue found 👌

• Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

[dependabot-preview]

A newer version of @actions/github exists, but since this PR has been edited by someone other than Dependabot I haven't updated it. You'll get a PR for the updated version as normal once this PR is merged.