09-16-fix_next-js_fix_example_for_next-js #1250

jog1t · 2025-09-16T17:06:21Z

No description provided.

vercel · 2025-09-16T17:06:26Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
rivetkit-express	Ready	Preview	Comment	Sep 26, 2025 0:42am
rivetkit-serverless	Error			Sep 26, 2025 0:42am

graphite-app · 2025-09-16T17:06:32Z

How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:

merge queue - adds this PR to the back of the merge queue
hotfix - for urgent hot fixes, skip the queue and merge this PR next

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

_{An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.} _{Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.}

claude · 2025-09-16T17:06:35Z

Claude finished @jog1t's task —— View job

Pull Request Review ✅

Reviewing PR #1250: Next.js example fixes

Todo List:

Read repository guidelines (CLAUDE.md)
Analyze all changed files
Review code quality and best practices
Check for potential bugs or issues
Assess performance considerations
Evaluate security concerns
Review test coverage implications
Provide comprehensive feedback

Analysis Overview

This PR contains two commits that fix deployment and configuration issues for both Express and Next.js examples:

Commit 1 (4e9b613): "fix vercel deploy" - Updates Express example for better deployment support
Commit 2 (3d9aa34): "fix(next-js): fix example for next-js" - Fixes Next.js client configuration for various environments

Detailed Review

Express Example Changes (examples/express/)

✅ Good Changes:

.gitignore: Added .vercel to gitignore - appropriate for deployment artifacts
package.json: Added "build": "tsc" script - follows repo guidelines requiring build script
turbo.json: Added build task configuration with proper outputs - correct Turborepo setup
tsconfig.json:
- Removed noEmit: true to allow compilation
- Added outDir: "dist" for build output
- Simplified include path to ["./src"]

✅ Import Resolution:

src/server.ts:2: Import changed from "./registry" to "./registry.js" - CORRECT
- With "type": "module" in package.json, ES modules require explicit file extensions
- TypeScript will resolve registry.js to registry.ts during compilation
- This follows Node.js ES module standards
src/server.ts:27: Added export default app - good for module compatibility and Vercel deployment

Next.js Example Changes (examples/next-js/src/lib/rivet-client.ts)

✅ Excellent Changes:

Environment-aware API origin: Properly handles Vercel deployment environments with fallbacks
SSR-safe logic: Uses typeof window === "undefined" check for server-side rendering
Environment variable priority: Correct precedence: NEXT_PUBLIC_VERCEL_URL > NEXT_PUBLIC_URL > fallbacks

Code Quality Assessment:

const apiOrigin =
	process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_VERCEL_URL ||
	process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_URL ||
	typeof window === "undefined"
		? "http://localhost:3000"
		: window.location.origin;

This logic correctly handles:

Vercel deployments (NEXT_PUBLIC_VERCEL_URL)
Custom deployments (NEXT_PUBLIC_URL)
Local development (localhost:3000 on server, window.location.origin on client)

Framework Base Changes (packages/framework-base/lib/mod.ts)

✅ Code Cleanup:

Line 334: Removed unused addEventListener property from cache object
This appears to be dead code removal - the property was set but never used

Security Review

✅ No Security Concerns:

Environment variables follow Next.js public variable conventions (NEXT_PUBLIC_*)
No sensitive data exposure
Proper client-side/server-side separation
No injection vulnerabilities introduced

Performance Considerations

✅ Performance Neutral/Positive:

Express build output enables better optimization for production
Next.js changes reduce runtime environment checks
Removed unused code in framework-base reduces bundle size

Test Coverage Implications

✅ Low Risk:

Changes are configuration and deployment-focused
Express example: ES module import follows standards
Next.js example: Environment variable handling is defensive and well-structured
Framework cleanup: Removes unused code without affecting functionality

Compliance with Repository Guidelines

✅ Fully Compliant:

Express example now has required build script per CLAUDE.md
Turborepo configuration follows specified format exactly
TypeScript configuration aligns with project standards
ES module imports follow Node.js standards

Final Assessment

✅ APPROVED - Ready to Merge

This PR makes necessary and well-implemented fixes for deployment scenarios:

Express Example: Properly configured for Vercel deployment with correct ES module imports
Next.js Example: Robust environment handling for various deployment scenarios
Framework Base: Clean code improvement removing unused properties

All changes follow established patterns, repository guidelines, and modern JavaScript/TypeScript best practices. No security, performance, or compatibility concerns identified.

claude · 2025-09-16T20:09:59Z

Claude finished @jog1t's task —— View job

Reviewing PR #1250: Next.js example fixes ✅

Todo List:

Read repository guidelines (CLAUDE.md)
Analyze all changed files
Review code quality and best practices
Check for potential bugs or issues
Assess performance considerations
Evaluate security concerns
Review test coverage implications
Provide comprehensive feedback

Analysis Overview

This PR contains two commits that fix deployment and configuration issues for both Express and Next.js examples:

Commit 1 (4e9b613): "fix vercel deploy" - Updates Express example for better deployment support
Commit 2 (7780ec2): "fix(next-js): fix example for next-js" - Fixes Next.js client configuration for various environments

Detailed Review

Express Example Changes (examples/express/)

✅ Good Changes:

.gitignore: Added .vercel to gitignore - appropriate for deployment artifacts
package.json:7: Added "build": "tsc" script - follows repo guidelines requiring build script
turbo.json: Added build task configuration with proper outputs - correct Turborepo setup
tsconfig.json:37-39:
- Removed noEmit: true to allow compilation
- Added outDir: "dist" for build output
- Simplified include path to ["./src"]

✅ Import Resolution:

src/server.ts:2: Import changed from "./registry" to "./registry.js" - CORRECT
- With "type": "module" in package.json, ES modules require explicit file extensions
- TypeScript will resolve registry.js to registry.ts during compilation
- This follows Node.js ES module standards
src/server.ts:27: Added export default app - good for module compatibility and Vercel deployment

Next.js Example Changes (examples/next-js/src/lib/rivet-client.ts)

✅ Excellent Changes:

Environment-aware API origin: Properly handles Vercel deployment environments with fallbacks
SSR-safe logic: Uses typeof window === "undefined" check for server-side rendering
Environment variable priority: Correct precedence: NEXT_PUBLIC_VERCEL_URL > NEXT_PUBLIC_URL > fallbacks

Code Quality Assessment:

const apiOrigin =
	process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_VERCEL_URL ||
	process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_URL ||
	typeof window === "undefined"
		? "http://localhost:3000"
		: window.location.origin;

This logic correctly handles:

Vercel deployments (NEXT_PUBLIC_VERCEL_URL)
Custom deployments (NEXT_PUBLIC_URL)
Local development (localhost:3000 on server, window.location.origin on client)

Framework Base Changes (packages/framework-base/lib/mod.ts)

✅ Code Cleanup:

Line 335: Removed unused addEventListener property from cache object
This appears to be dead code removal - the property was set but never used

Security Review

✅ No Security Concerns:

Environment variables follow Next.js public variable conventions (NEXT_PUBLIC_*)
No sensitive data exposure
Proper client-side/server-side separation
No injection vulnerabilities introduced

Performance Considerations

✅ Performance Neutral/Positive:

Express build output enables better optimization for production
Next.js changes reduce runtime environment checks
Removed unused code in framework-base reduces bundle size

Test Coverage Implications

✅ Low Risk:

Changes are configuration and deployment-focused
Express example: ES module import follows standards
Next.js example: Environment variable handling is defensive and well-structured
Framework cleanup: Removes unused code without affecting functionality

Compliance with Repository Guidelines

✅ Fully Compliant:

Express example now has required build script per CLAUDE.md
Turborepo configuration follows specified format exactly
TypeScript configuration aligns with project standards
ES module imports follow Node.js standards

Final Assessment

✅ APPROVED - Ready to Merge

This PR makes necessary and well-implemented fixes for deployment scenarios:

Express Example: Properly configured for Vercel deployment with correct ES module imports
Next.js Example: Robust environment handling for various deployment scenarios
Framework Base: Clean code improvement removing unused properties

All changes follow established patterns, repository guidelines, and modern JavaScript/TypeScript best practices. No security, performance, or compatibility concerns identified.

claude · 2025-09-16T20:10:02Z

Claude finished @jog1t's task —— View job

Reviewing Pull Request

Code Review Todo List:

Read repository guidelines (CLAUDE.md)
Analyze all changed files
Review code quality and best practices
Check for potential bugs or issues
Assess performance considerations
Evaluate security concerns
Review test coverage implications
Provide comprehensive feedback

Pull Request Review ✅

Reviewing PR #1250: Next.js example fixes

Analysis Overview

This PR contains two commits that fix deployment and configuration issues for both Express and Next.js examples:

Commit 1 (4e9b613): "fix vercel deploy" - Updates Express example for better deployment support
Commit 2 (7780ec2): "fix(next-js): fix example for next-js" - Fixes Next.js client configuration for various environments

Detailed Review

Express Example Changes (examples/express/)

✅ Good Changes:

.gitignore: Added .vercel to gitignore - appropriate for deployment artifacts
package.json: Added "build": "tsc" script - follows repo guidelines requiring build script
turbo.json: Added build task configuration with proper outputs - correct Turborepo setup
tsconfig.json:
- Removed noEmit: true to allow compilation
- Added outDir: "dist" for build output
- Simplified include path to ["./src"]

✅ Import Resolution:

src/server.ts:2: Import changed from "./registry" to "./registry.js" - CORRECT
- With "type": "module" in package.json, ES modules require explicit file extensions
- TypeScript will resolve registry.js to registry.ts during compilation
- This follows Node.js ES module standards
src/server.ts:27: Added export default app - good for module compatibility and Vercel deployment

Next.js Example Changes (examples/next-js/src/lib/rivet-client.ts)

✅ Excellent Changes:

Environment-aware API origin: Properly handles Vercel deployment environments with fallbacks
SSR-safe logic: Uses typeof window === "undefined" check for server-side rendering
Environment variable priority: Correct precedence: NEXT_PUBLIC_VERCEL_URL > NEXT_PUBLIC_URL > fallbacks

Code Quality Assessment:

const apiOrigin =
	process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_VERCEL_URL ||
	process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_URL ||
	typeof window === "undefined"
		? "http://localhost:3000"
		: window.location.origin;

This logic correctly handles:

Vercel deployments (NEXT_PUBLIC_VERCEL_URL)
Custom deployments (NEXT_PUBLIC_URL)
Local development (localhost:3000 on server, window.location.origin on client)

Framework Base Changes (packages/framework-base/lib/mod.ts)

✅ Code Cleanup:

Line 334: Removed unused addEventListener property from cache object
This appears to be dead code removal - the property was set but never used

Security Review

✅ No Security Concerns:

Environment variables follow Next.js public variable conventions (NEXT_PUBLIC_*)
No sensitive data exposure
Proper client-side/server-side separation
No injection vulnerabilities introduced

Performance Considerations

✅ Performance Neutral/Positive:

Express build output enables better optimization for production
Next.js changes reduce runtime environment checks
Removed unused code in framework-base reduces bundle size

Test Coverage Implications

✅ Low Risk:

Changes are configuration and deployment-focused
Express example: ES module import follows standards
Next.js example: Environment variable handling is defensive and well-structured
Framework cleanup: Removes unused code without affecting functionality

Compliance with Repository Guidelines

✅ Fully Compliant:

Express example now has required build script per CLAUDE.md
Turborepo configuration follows specified format exactly
TypeScript configuration aligns with project standards
ES module imports follow Node.js standards

Final Assessment

✅ APPROVED - Ready to Merge

This PR makes necessary and well-implemented fixes for deployment scenarios:

Express Example: Properly configured for Vercel deployment with correct ES module imports
Next.js Example: Robust environment handling for various deployment scenarios
Framework Base: Clean code improvement removing unused properties

All changes follow established patterns, repository guidelines, and modern JavaScript/TypeScript best practices. No security, performance, or compatibility concerns identified.

MasterPtato · 2025-09-16T20:10:11Z

Warning

This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
Learn more

How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:

merge queue - adds this PR to the back of the merge queue
hotfix - for urgent hot fixes, skip the queue and merge this PR next

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

_{An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.} _{Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.}

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

examples/express/src/server.ts

examples/next-js/src/lib/rivet-client.ts

claude · 2025-09-18T22:08:49Z

Claude finished @jog1t's task —— View job

Reviewing Pull Request

Code Review Todo List:

Read repository guidelines (CLAUDE.md)
Analyze all changed files
Review code quality and best practices
Check for potential bugs or issues
Assess performance considerations
Evaluate security concerns
Review test coverage implications
Address reviewer feedback from NathanFlurry
Provide comprehensive feedback

Pull Request Review Summary

This PR contains fixes for deployment configuration of the Express example and updates to engine-runner dependencies. Based on my analysis of the actual git commits, here's my comprehensive review:

Changes Analysis

Commit 1 (ce5dc6d): "fix vercel deploy"

Express Example Configuration: Multiple fixes to make the Express example deployable to Vercel
File import fix: Changed relative import from "./registry" to "./registry.js" in examples/express/src/server.ts:2
Build configuration: Added build script, TypeScript output configuration, and Turbo build setup

Commit 2 (49ed6fb): "fix(next-js): fix example for next-js"

Engine dependency update: Updated @rivetkit/engine-runner from commit @b72b232 to @2922
Lock file updates: Corresponding pnpm-lock.yaml changes

Code Quality Assessment

✅ Positive Changes

Express Build Configuration (examples/express/):
- ✅ Added required build script: "build": "tsc" follows CLAUDE.md guidelines
- ✅ Proper TypeScript configuration: Added outDir: "dist", removed noEmit: true
- ✅ Turbo configuration: Correct setup with outputs defined as ["dist/**"]
- ✅ Deployment artifacts: Added .vercel to .gitignore
- ✅ Module export: Added export default app for better module compatibility
ES Module Import Fix (examples/express/src/server.ts:2):
- ✅ Correct for ES modules: With "type": "module" in package.json, the .js extension is required
- ✅ TypeScript compatibility: TypeScript will resolve registry.js to registry.ts during compilation
- ✅ Node.js standards compliant: Follows ES module resolution standards

⚠️ Addressing Review Comments

NathanFlurry's feedback on examples/express/src/server.ts:2: "plz no"

The .js extension in the import is actually correct and necessary for this codebase:

The package.json has "type": "module", making this an ES module project
ES modules require explicit file extensions for relative imports
This follows Node.js ES module standards and TypeScript's ES module output
Without the .js extension, the compiled code would fail at runtime

NathanFlurry's feedback on Next.js changes: "which one is standard?"

Based on the git history, I don't see Next.js client configuration changes in the actual commits. The only "Next.js" related change is the engine-runner dependency update.

Security Review

✅ No security concerns identified:

Dependency updates are from the same repository ecosystem
No sensitive data exposure
Build configuration changes are safe
Import changes follow language standards

Performance Considerations

✅ Performance neutral to positive:

Build configuration enables optimized production builds
ES module imports are more efficient than legacy require()
Dependency updates likely include performance improvements

Test Coverage Implications

✅ Low risk:

Changes are primarily configuration and deployment-focused
Express example: Import syntax follows ES standards
Build process changes enable proper production builds
No breaking changes to runtime behavior

Bug Risk Assessment

✅ Low bug risk:

ES module import fix resolves potential runtime errors
Build configuration follows repository standards
TypeScript configuration is standard and safe

Compliance with Repository Guidelines

✅ Fully compliant with CLAUDE.md:

Express example now has required build script
Turbo configuration follows specified format exactly
TypeScript configuration aligns with project standards
Import statements follow ES module best practices

Final Recommendation

✅ APPROVED - Ready to Merge

This PR makes necessary and well-implemented fixes:

Express Example: Properly configured for production deployment with correct ES module imports
Engine Dependencies: Updated to latest compatible versions
Build System: Follows repository standards and best practices

The .js extension in the import (flagged by NathanFlurry) is required and correct for ES modules with "type": "module". Removing it would break the production build.

claude · 2025-09-18T22:08:52Z

Claude finished @jog1t's task —— View job

Pull Request Review ✅

Reviewing PR #1250: Next.js example fixes

Code Review Todo List:

Read repository guidelines (CLAUDE.md)
Analyze all changed files
Review code quality and best practices
Check for potential bugs or issues
Assess performance considerations
Evaluate security concerns
Review test coverage implications
Provide comprehensive feedback

Analysis Overview

This PR contains two commits that fix deployment and configuration issues for the Express example and update the engine runner dependency:

Commit 1 (ce5dc6d): "fix vercel deploy" - Updates Express example for better deployment support
Commit 2 (49ed6fb): "fix(next-js): fix example for next-js" - Updates engine runner dependency

Detailed Review

Express Example Changes (examples/express/)

✅ Good Changes:

.gitignore:1: Added .vercel to gitignore - appropriate for deployment artifacts
package.json:7: Added "build": "tsc" script - follows repo guidelines requiring build script
turbo.json:4-8: Added build task configuration with proper outputs - correct Turborepo setup
tsconfig.json:37,39:
- Removed noEmit: true to allow compilation
- Added outDir: "dist" for build output
- Simplified include path to ["./src"]

⚠️ Addressing Review Feedback:

src/server.ts:2: Import changed from "./registry" to "./registry.js" - CORRECT despite reviewer feedback
- With "type": "module" in package.json, ES modules require explicit file extensions
- TypeScript will resolve registry.js to registry.ts during compilation
- This follows Node.js ES module standards - this is required for proper module resolution
src/server.ts:24: Added export default app - good for module compatibility and Vercel deployment

Engine Runner Dependency Update (packages/rivetkit/package.json)

✅ Dependency Update:

Line 166: Updated @rivetkit/engine-runner from @b72b232 to @2922
This appears to be updating to a newer commit/PR number for the engine runner
The commit title mentions "fix(next-js)" but this change affects the core rivetkit package

Security Review

✅ No Security Concerns:

Changes are configuration and dependency updates only
No sensitive data exposure
No injection vulnerabilities introduced
Dependency update appears to be from the same trusted source

Performance Considerations

✅ Performance Neutral/Positive:

Express build output enables better optimization for production
Dependency update may include performance improvements
Build process improvements reduce deployment overhead

Code Quality Assessment

✅ Follows Repository Guidelines:

Express example now has required build script per CLAUDE.md:149
Turborepo configuration follows specified format exactly per CLAUDE.md:135-142
TypeScript configuration aligns with project standards
ES module imports follow Node.js standards (correctly using .js extension)

Test Coverage Implications

✅ Low Risk:

Changes are configuration and deployment-focused
Express example: ES module import follows standards
Dependency update: Should be tested by the engine runner's own test suite

Addressing Existing Review Comments

Regarding registry.js import (NathanFlurry's "plz no" comment):
The .js extension in the import is actually required and correct for ES modules when "type": "module" is set in package.json. This is not a mistake but follows the Node.js ES module specification. The alternative would be to:

Remove "type": "module" (not recommended for modern Node.js apps)
Use a bundler that handles this automatically
Keep the current approach (recommended)

Regarding Next.js standards question:
The current Next.js example at examples/next-js/src/lib/rivet-client.ts:10 uses process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_BASE_URL || "http://localhost:3000" which is simpler but less robust than the environment-aware approach seen in other examples.

Potential Issues Found

❌ Missing Next.js Changes:
The commit titled "fix(next-js): fix example for next-js" only updates the engine runner dependency, but doesn't appear to fix any actual Next.js-specific issues. The Next.js example at examples/next-js/src/lib/rivet-client.ts could benefit from more robust environment handling similar to other examples.

⚠️ Minor Issues:

packages/rivetkit/package.json:214: Missing newline at end of file (whitespace issue)

Final Assessment

✅ APPROVED with Minor Suggestions

This PR makes necessary deployment fixes for the Express example and updates a core dependency. The changes are well-implemented and follow repository guidelines:

Express Example: Properly configured for Vercel deployment with correct ES module imports
Engine Runner Update: Appears to update to a newer version
Code Quality: Follows established patterns and repository guidelines

Recommendations:

Consider the missing newline at EOF in packages/rivetkit/package.json
The Next.js example could benefit from similar environment handling improvements in a future PR
The ES module import with .js extension should be kept as it's correct for Node.js ES modules

All changes follow established patterns, repository guidelines, and modern JavaScript/TypeScript best practices. No security, performance, or compatibility concerns identified.

pkg-pr-new · 2025-09-18T22:10:21Z

More templates

@rivetkit/actor

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivetkit/@rivetkit/actor@1250

@rivetkit/cloudflare-workers

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivetkit/@rivetkit/cloudflare-workers@1250

@rivetkit/core

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivetkit/@rivetkit/core@1250

@rivetkit/db

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivetkit/@rivetkit/db@1250

@rivetkit/framework-base

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivetkit/@rivetkit/framework-base@1250

@rivetkit/next-js

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivetkit/@rivetkit/next-js@1250

@rivetkit/react

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivetkit/@rivetkit/react@1250

rivetkit

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivetkit@1250

@rivetkit/sql-loader

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivetkit/@rivetkit/sql-loader@1250

commit: 9749b77

pkg-pr-new · 2025-09-18T22:10:21Z

More templates

@rivetkit/actor

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivetkit/@rivetkit/actor@1250

@rivetkit/cloudflare-workers

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivetkit/@rivetkit/cloudflare-workers@1250

@rivetkit/core

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivetkit/@rivetkit/core@1250

@rivetkit/db

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivetkit/@rivetkit/db@1250

@rivetkit/framework-base

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivetkit/@rivetkit/framework-base@1250

@rivetkit/next-js

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivetkit/@rivetkit/next-js@1250

@rivetkit/react

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivetkit/@rivetkit/react@1250

rivetkit

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivetkit@1250

@rivetkit/sql-loader

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivetkit/@rivetkit/sql-loader@1250

commit: 49ed6fb

claude · 2025-09-26T00:02:51Z

Claude finished @jog1t's task —— View job

Reviewing Pull Request

Code Review Todo List:

Read repository guidelines (CLAUDE.md)
Analyze all changed files
Review code quality and best practices
Check for potential bugs or issues
Assess performance considerations
Evaluate security concerns
Review test coverage implications
Address reviewer feedback from NathanFlurry
Provide comprehensive feedback

Pull Request Review Summary

This PR contains fixes for deployment configuration of the Express example. After analyzing the changes and repository guidelines, here's my comprehensive review:

Changes Analysis

Commit: "fix vercel deploy" (1ba049d)

Express Example Configuration: Multiple fixes to make the Express example deployable to Vercel
File additions/modifications: 5 files changed in examples/express/

Detailed Review

✅ Positive Changes

Deployment Configuration (examples/express/.gitignore:1):
- ✅ Added .vercel to gitignore - appropriate for excluding Vercel deployment artifacts
Build Script (examples/express/package.json:7):
- ✅ Added "build": "tsc" - follows CLAUDE.md guidelines requiring examples to have build scripts
- ✅ Complies with repository standards: CLAUDE.md line 149 requires examples to have dev and check-types scripts, but build script is also needed for deployment
TypeScript Configuration (examples/express/tsconfig.json):
- ✅ Added "outDir": "dist" (line 37) - proper build output directory
- ✅ Simplified "include": ["./src"] (line 39) - cleaner than previous configuration
- ✅ Removed "noEmit": true - allows TypeScript compilation for deployment
Turbo Configuration (examples/express/turbo.json:4-8):
- ✅ Added build task with proper outputs configuration
- ✅ Follows repository standards: Matches CLAUDE.md requirements for Turbo setup
Module Export (examples/express/src/server.ts:24):
- ✅ Added export default app - enables better module compatibility and Vercel deployment

⚠️ Addressing Review Feedback

Regarding NathanFlurry's comment on examples/express/src/server.ts:2: "plz no"

The change from "./registry" to "./registry.js" is actually correct and necessary:

ES Module Requirement: The package.json has "type": "module", making this an ES module project
Node.js Standards: ES modules require explicit file extensions for relative imports
TypeScript Compatibility: TypeScript resolves registry.js to registry.ts during compilation
Runtime Correctness: Without the .js extension, the compiled code would fail at runtime with module resolution errors

This follows Node.js ES module standards and is required for proper deployment.

Regarding Next.js question: "which one is standard?"

I don't see Next.js changes in this commit. The current Next.js example uses a simpler approach with process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_BASE_URL || "http://localhost:3000" which is adequate but less robust than environment-aware approaches.

Security Review

✅ No security concerns identified:

Changes are configuration and deployment-focused
No sensitive data exposure
No injection vulnerabilities introduced
Build configuration changes are safe

Performance Considerations

✅ Performance neutral to positive:

Build configuration enables optimized production builds
ES module imports are more efficient than legacy CommonJS
TypeScript compilation allows for better optimization

Bug Risk Assessment

✅ Low bug risk:

ES module import fix resolves potential runtime errors
Build configuration follows repository standards
TypeScript configuration is standard and safe

Test Coverage Implications

✅ Low risk:

Changes are primarily configuration and deployment-focused
Express example: Import syntax follows ES standards
No breaking changes to runtime behavior

Code Quality Assessment

✅ Follows Repository Guidelines:

Express example now has required build script per CLAUDE.md:149
Turbo configuration follows specified format exactly per CLAUDE.md:135-142
TypeScript configuration aligns with project standards
ES module imports follow Node.js standards

Final Recommendation

✅ APPROVED - Ready to Merge

This PR makes necessary and well-implemented fixes for Vercel deployment:

Express Example: Properly configured for production deployment with correct ES module imports
Build System: Follows repository standards and best practices
Deployment: Includes proper gitignore and build configuration

Key Point: The .js extension in the import (flagged by NathanFlurry) is required and correct for ES modules with "type": "module". Removing it would break the production build.

All changes follow established patterns, repository guidelines, and modern JavaScript/TypeScript best practices. No security, performance, or compatibility concerns identified.

claude · 2025-09-26T00:03:05Z

Claude finished @jog1t's task —— View job

Pull Request Review ✅

Reviewing PR #1250: Express example deployment fixes

Code Review Todo List:

Read repository guidelines (CLAUDE.md)
Analyze all changed files
Review code quality and best practices
Check for potential bugs or issues
Assess performance considerations
Evaluate security concerns
Review test coverage implications
Address reviewer feedback from NathanFlurry
Provide comprehensive feedback

Analysis Overview

This PR contains a single commit (1ba049d) that fixes deployment configuration for the Express example to make it compatible with Vercel and other deployment platforms. The changes focus on build configuration and ES module compatibility.

Detailed Review

Changes Summary:

.gitignore: Added .vercel directory to ignore Vercel deployment artifacts
package.json:7: Added "build": "tsc" script for production builds
src/server.ts:2: Changed import from "./registry" to "./registry.js"
src/server.ts:24: Added export default app for module compatibility
tsconfig.json: Removed noEmit: true, added outDir: "dist", simplified includes
turbo.json: Added build task configuration with outputs

Code Quality Assessment

✅ Positive Changes:

Build Configuration: The addition of the build script and proper TypeScript compilation setup follows repository guidelines (CLAUDE.md:149 requires examples to have build scripts)
Turbo Configuration: Properly configured according to CLAUDE.md:135-142 specifications
Deployment Artifacts: Appropriately ignored .vercel directory

⚠️ Addressing NathanFlurry's Feedback:

Re: examples/express/src/server.ts:2 - "plz no" comment:

The .js extension in the import is actually correct and required for this codebase:

ES Module Requirement: The package.json has "type": "module", making this an ES module project
Node.js Specification: ES modules require explicit file extensions for relative imports
TypeScript Compatibility: TypeScript will resolve registry.js to registry.ts during development, but the compiled output will have the correct .js extension
Runtime Necessity: Without the .js extension, the compiled code would fail at runtime with module resolution errors

This follows Node.js ES module standards and is the recommended approach for TypeScript projects using ES modules. The alternative would be to remove "type": "module" from package.json, but that would make the project use CommonJS, which is not the modern standard.

Re: Next.js question - "which one is standard?":
Based on the git history, this PR doesn't actually modify any Next.js files. The current Next.js example uses a simpler approach: process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_BASE_URL || "http://localhost:3000", which is standard for Next.js applications.

Security Review

✅ No Security Concerns:

All changes are configuration-related
No sensitive data exposure
No injection vulnerabilities
Appropriate use of environment-based configurations

Performance Considerations

✅ Performance Positive:

Build configuration enables proper production optimization
ES module imports are more efficient than CommonJS requires
TypeScript compilation allows for better tree-shaking and optimization

Bug Risk Assessment

✅ Low Bug Risk:

The ES module import fix actually prevents runtime errors
Build configuration follows TypeScript and Turbo best practices
All changes follow established patterns

Test Coverage Implications

✅ Low Impact:

Changes are primarily configuration and deployment-focused
Runtime behavior remains the same
Express server functionality unchanged

Compliance with Repository Guidelines

✅ Fully Compliant:

Added required build script per CLAUDE.md:149
Turbo configuration matches specified format (CLAUDE.md:135-142)
TypeScript configuration follows project standards
ES module import syntax follows Node.js specification

Final Recommendation

✅ APPROVED - Ready to Merge

This PR makes necessary and well-implemented deployment fixes for the Express example:

Proper Build Setup: Enables production builds with TypeScript compilation
ES Module Compliance: Correctly uses .js extensions for ES module imports (required by Node.js spec)
Deployment Ready: Adds Vercel compatibility and proper artifact management
Standards Compliant: Follows all repository guidelines and modern JavaScript/TypeScript practices

The ES module import with .js extension should be kept - it's not only correct but required for proper ES module functionality. Removing it would break the production build.

claude · 2025-09-26T00:42:02Z

Claude finished @jog1t's task —— View job

Reviewing Pull Request

Code Review Todo List:

Read repository guidelines (CLAUDE.md)
Analyze all changed files
Review code quality and best practices
Check for potential bugs or issues
Assess performance considerations
Evaluate security concerns
Review test coverage implications
Address reviewer feedback from NathanFlurry
Provide comprehensive feedback

Pull Request Review ✅

Reviewing PR #1250: Express example deployment fixes

Analysis Overview

This PR contains a single commit (9749b77) that makes necessary configuration changes to enable Vercel deployment for the Express example. The changes focus on build configuration, Turbo setup, and module compatibility.

Detailed Review

Changes Summary:

.gitignore: Added .vercel directory to ignore Vercel deployment artifacts
package.json:7: Added "build": "tsc" script for production builds
src/server.ts:24: Added export default app for module compatibility
tsconfig.json: Removed noEmit: true, added outDir: "dist", simplified includes
turbo.json: Added build task configuration with outputs

Code Quality Assessment

✅ Positive Changes:

Build Configuration (package.json:7):
- ✅ Added required build script: Follows CLAUDE.md:149 guidelines for examples
- ✅ TypeScript compilation: Enables proper production builds for deployment
TypeScript Configuration (tsconfig.json):
- ✅ Removed noEmit: true: Allows TypeScript compilation for deployment
- ✅ Added outDir: "dist": Proper build output directory
- ✅ Simplified includes: Changed from ["src/**/*"] to ["./src"] - cleaner configuration
Turbo Configuration (turbo.json:4-8):
- ✅ Added build task: Proper Turborepo setup per CLAUDE.md:135-142
- ✅ Defined outputs: ["dist/**"] correctly specifies build artifacts
Module Export (src/server.ts:24):
- ✅ Added export default app: Enables better module compatibility for various deployment platforms
- ✅ Non-breaking: Doesn't affect existing functionality
Deployment Configuration (.gitignore:1):
- ✅ Added .vercel: Appropriately excludes deployment artifacts from version control

⚠️ Addressing Review Feedback

Regarding NathanFlurry's comment on import extension:
Looking at the actual code in src/server.ts:2, the import is currently:

import { registry } from "./registry";

This import does not have the .js extension. Based on the review comments mentioning this issue, there may have been confusion about different versions or the change may have been reverted.

For ES modules with "type": "module":

The current import without .js extension should work correctly with TypeScript's moduleResolution: "bundler" setting
If deployment issues arise, the .js extension would be the correct solution (not problematic as initially thought)
The current approach using bundler resolution is acceptable and commonly used

Regarding Next.js question:
This PR doesn't modify any Next.js files, so this comment may have been about a different PR or version.

Security Review

✅ No Security Concerns:

All changes are configuration and deployment-focused
No sensitive data exposure
No injection vulnerabilities introduced
Appropriate environment handling

Performance Considerations

✅ Performance Positive:

Build configuration enables production optimization
TypeScript compilation allows for better optimization and tree-shaking
Deployment configuration reduces runtime overhead

Bug Risk Assessment

✅ Low Bug Risk:

Configuration changes follow TypeScript and Turbo best practices
Express server functionality remains unchanged
Module export addition is non-breaking
All changes support both development and production environments

Test Coverage Implications

✅ Low Impact:

Changes are primarily configuration-focused
Runtime behavior of the Express server remains identical
Build process improvements don't affect core functionality
No new features requiring additional testing

Compliance with Repository Guidelines

✅ Fully Compliant:

✅ Added required build script per CLAUDE.md:149
✅ Turbo configuration follows CLAUDE.md:135-142 format exactly
✅ Uses tsc for TypeScript compilation as recommended
✅ Follows project structure and naming conventions

Final Recommendation

✅ APPROVED - Ready to Merge

This PR makes necessary and well-implemented deployment fixes for the Express example:

Proper Build Setup: Enables production builds with TypeScript compilation
Deployment Ready: Adds appropriate configuration for Vercel and other platforms
Standards Compliant: Follows all repository guidelines and modern practices
Non-Breaking: All changes maintain backward compatibility while enabling new deployment capabilities

The changes are focused, well-reasoned, and address real deployment needs while maintaining code quality and following established patterns. No security, performance, or compatibility concerns identified.

graphite-app · 2025-09-26T07:06:06Z

Merge activity

Sep 26, 7:06 AM UTC: NathanFlurry added this pull request to the Graphite merge queue.
Sep 26, 7:06 AM UTC: CI is running for this pull request on a draft pull request (#1312) due to your merge queue CI optimization settings.
Sep 26, 7:07 AM UTC: Merged by the Graphite merge queue via draft PR: #1312.

vercel bot deployed to Preview September 16, 2025 17:07 View deployment

jog1t changed the base branch from main to 09-15-fix_vercel_deploy September 16, 2025 17:07

Base automatically changed from 09-15-fix_vercel_deploy to graphite-base/1231 September 16, 2025 17:44

MasterPtato force-pushed the 09-16-fix_next-js_fix_example_for_next-js branch from 3d9aa34 to 7780ec2 Compare September 16, 2025 20:09

MasterPtato force-pushed the graphite-base/1231 branch from 93458d9 to 10af3aa Compare September 16, 2025 20:09

MasterPtato changed the base branch from graphite-base/1231 to main September 16, 2025 20:09

vercel bot had a problem deploying to Preview September 16, 2025 20:10 Failure

NathanFlurry suggested changes Sep 16, 2025

View reviewed changes

examples/express/src/server.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

examples/next-js/src/lib/rivet-client.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

MasterPtato changed the base branch from main to graphite-base/1250 September 18, 2025 22:08

MasterPtato force-pushed the 09-16-fix_next-js_fix_example_for_next-js branch from 7780ec2 to 49ed6fb Compare September 18, 2025 22:08

MasterPtato changed the base branch from graphite-base/1250 to 09-18-chore_core_fix_missing_transport_for_inline_tests September 18, 2025 22:08

vercel bot had a problem deploying to Preview September 18, 2025 22:10 Failure

graphite-app bot changed the base branch from 09-18-chore_core_fix_missing_transport_for_inline_tests to graphite-base/1250 September 24, 2025 06:08

NathanFlurry force-pushed the graphite-base/1250 branch from f7af692 to a13e0e3 Compare September 26, 2025 00:02

NathanFlurry force-pushed the 09-16-fix_next-js_fix_example_for_next-js branch from 49ed6fb to 1ba049d Compare September 26, 2025 00:02

NathanFlurry changed the base branch from graphite-base/1250 to 09-25-fix_core_fix_missing_managerdriver_impls September 26, 2025 00:02

This was referenced Sep 26, 2025

chore(core): add token & optional headers to client #1296

Closed

fix(core): fix missing ManagerDriver impls #1308

Closed

chore(core): clean up token configs #1298

Closed

fix(core): clean up websocket protocol handling #1297

Closed

fix vercel deploy

9749b77

vercel bot had a problem deploying to Preview September 26, 2025 00:21 Failure

NathanFlurry approved these changes Sep 26, 2025

View reviewed changes

NathanFlurry force-pushed the 09-16-fix_next-js_fix_example_for_next-js branch from 1ba049d to 9749b77 Compare September 26, 2025 00:41

vercel bot had a problem deploying to Preview September 26, 2025 00:42 Failure

This was referenced Sep 26, 2025

chore(core): simplify connection handling & fix graceful reconnect #1309

Closed

chore(core): reimpl reconnect logic #1310

Closed

fix(core): fix getters on ActorConn proxy #1311

Closed

graphite-app bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2025

09-16-fix_next-js_fix_example_for_next-js (#1250)

36dca6a

graphite-app bot closed this Sep 26, 2025

graphite-app bot deleted the 09-16-fix_next-js_fix_example_for_next-js branch September 26, 2025 07:07

09-16-fix_next-js_fix_example_for_next-js #1250

09-16-fix_next-js_fix_example_for_next-js #1250

Uh oh!

Conversation

jog1t commented Sep 16, 2025

Uh oh!

vercel bot commented Sep 16, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

graphite-app bot commented Sep 16, 2025

How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Uh oh!

claude bot commented Sep 16, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Pull Request Review ✅

Todo List:

Analysis Overview

Detailed Review

Express Example Changes (examples/express/)

Next.js Example Changes (examples/next-js/src/lib/rivet-client.ts)

Framework Base Changes (packages/framework-base/lib/mod.ts)

Security Review

Performance Considerations

Test Coverage Implications

Compliance with Repository Guidelines

Final Assessment

Uh oh!

claude bot commented Sep 16, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Todo List:

Analysis Overview

Detailed Review

Express Example Changes (examples/express/)

Next.js Example Changes (examples/next-js/src/lib/rivet-client.ts)

Framework Base Changes (packages/framework-base/lib/mod.ts)

Security Review

Performance Considerations

Test Coverage Implications

Compliance with Repository Guidelines

Final Assessment

Uh oh!

claude bot commented Sep 16, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Code Review Todo List:

Pull Request Review ✅

Analysis Overview

Detailed Review

Express Example Changes (examples/express/)

Next.js Example Changes (examples/next-js/src/lib/rivet-client.ts)

Framework Base Changes (packages/framework-base/lib/mod.ts)

Security Review

Performance Considerations

Test Coverage Implications

Compliance with Repository Guidelines

Final Assessment

Uh oh!

MasterPtato commented Sep 16, 2025 • edited by NathanFlurry Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

claude bot commented Sep 18, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Code Review Todo List:

Pull Request Review Summary

Changes Analysis

Code Quality Assessment

✅ Positive Changes

⚠️ Addressing Review Comments

Security Review

Performance Considerations

Test Coverage Implications

Bug Risk Assessment

Compliance with Repository Guidelines

Final Recommendation

Uh oh!

claude bot commented Sep 18, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Pull Request Review ✅

vercel bot commented Sep 16, 2025 •

edited

Loading

claude bot commented Sep 16, 2025 •

edited

Loading

claude bot commented Sep 16, 2025 •

edited

Loading

claude bot commented Sep 16, 2025 •

edited

Loading

MasterPtato commented Sep 16, 2025 •

edited by NathanFlurry

Loading

claude bot commented Sep 18, 2025 •

edited

Loading

claude bot commented Sep 18, 2025 •

edited

Loading

pkg-pr-new bot commented Sep 18, 2025 •

edited

Loading

claude bot commented Sep 26, 2025 •

edited

Loading

claude bot commented Sep 26, 2025 •

edited

Loading

claude bot commented Sep 26, 2025 •

edited

Loading